They were mainly talking GPU and CPU. ps4 came out when 4k did not exist so it never got a output to display 4k.Could the base PS4 do 4k60hdr?
They were mainly talking GPU and CPU. ps4 came out when 4k did not exist so it never got a output to display 4k.
So this is exactly what normal gamers needit's a base PS4 with dlss and SSD.
Right, I'll gladly accept that the specs are similar with the caveat that DLSS is a gamechanger and the base PS4 can only do 1080p(I think).They were mainly talking GPU and CPU. ps4 came out when 4k did not exist so it never got a output to display 4k.
dlss was game changed for cyberpunk imo vas base ps4 . every other port with dlss lite not really. sometimes dlss will push switch 2 into pro level but its been very few games so far.Right, I'll gladly accept that the specs are similar with the caveat that DLSS is a gamechanger and the base PS4 can only do 1080p(I think).
I remember the base PS4. It was great but the PS4 Pro was a gamechanger on my LG OLED set. I could never go back to base PS4 but Switch 2 is actually great docked.
It was a retarded opinion then, and it's still one now. The Jaguar architecture of the PS4 was shit, Ampere is generations ahead.
It really doesn't matter because we are in diminishing returns. PS5 is several times more powerful then ps4 but the jump is not that big graphically, no where near ps3 vs ps4. with switch 2 the jump is not big enough to give you a a much better experience in most games.It was a retarded opinion then, and it's still one now. The Jaguar architecture of the PS4 was shit, Ampere is generations ahead.
Portability always added hefty tax compared to stationary consoles for same specs, hell even now if u get pc vs lappy with same specs(not names, actual performance) u likely gotta forkup at least double(and obviously u cant match anything above mid-end).Yeah, but a PS4 now costs 100 bucks, not 500
Dude, Jaguar is a CPU architecture and Ampere is a GPU architecture.
Fixed that for you.To this day I have no idea why this triggers people. PS4 level raw performance plus modern features is excellent for a Nintendo Plattform.
Base PS4 with DLSS is very good BTW, really don't get the PS4 hate.
It's more than a PS4 with DLSS.
It also has a better CPU. It has full support for DX12_2. Can do a bit of RT. Has delta color compression. Shader Model 6.8.
Still have some 'ARM' limitations, not to mention Jaguar have more cores. Most of the lift are from the GPU.
Still for me a PS4 with DLSS, maybe a better PS4, but still the release games match each some and others.
Imo they nailed it. it's a base PS4 with dlss and SSD. You can see in rich's face just wanting to say it was a damn ps4 but he doesn't wanna lose views, understandable.
The A78 on the Switch 2 also has 8 cores for 8 threads. But it has a more advanced front end. And it has 4MB of L3 cache.
imo its a ps4 pro because of the 4k
Numbers pushed back by the energy consumption. As I said, there are games running better on NS2 than PS4, but also games running as same or worse on NS2.
So this is exactly what normal gamers need
A base ps4 in the year 2026 for 500 dollars with ps4 looking games for 80 dollars a pop. Great value here folks.
then it's just a PS4 that can do 4K thenby that logic the Xbox One S is an Xbox One X because of the 4k...
like, what?