• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

DLSS 5 - Yes or No?

Do you think DLSS 5 is the future?

  • Yes and I like it

  • Yes but I don't like it

  • No, it's ugly and we'll forget about it

  • No opinion/other

  • No, we need less AI not more


Results are only viewable after voting.
I think the bottom line is that the average person has seen one too many AI Faces, and therefore they can't unsee the AI Face in the DLSS 5 versions of these character models. It's uncanny and it's off putting to a lot of people. You're not going to gaslight them into thinking it's better.

Furthermore this is ultimately one more big step towards an industry where major publishers will be firing thousands of hard working and talented artists and developers, in favor of cost saving with Generative AI. You're fooling yourself if you think publishers aren't salivating at the idea. Some of the tech might be impressive, but it's implications for the industry paint a dark future.

Some of the greatest stories and games ever made came from the passion, discipline, and imagination of talented creators working within constraints. They didn't have limitless tools or automation to fall back on, so they had to push what was available as far as it could go to realize their vision. That pressure is what led to distinctive styles and memorable design choices. Limitation breeds creativity. When technology starts filling in the gaps with minimal human effort, that creative edge risks getting dulled.
 
Just catching up on the DF post regarding DLSS 5 -
"it doesn't have access to original game assets, geometry, depth or per-material metadata,".
Surely they should work on integrating this and it would solve a lot of the potential issues.
 


The comment in that tweet is needlessly antagonistic, but the gif seems self-evident that it's the same model with lighting and color/"makeup" changes.

DLSS 5.0 doesn't have any concept of a model though. It only has access to the rendered frame + depth buffers + motion vectors. If DLSS 5 was a system that developers fed their lighting data into, and it produced corresponding light values for the scene, I think there would be zero issues.
 
I see it as the corporate answer to those fan reshades for games...some people will like it and use it, but no universal adoption as long as it's this intrusive and hardware expensive
 
Its awesome . Cant wait to see some real next gen graphics with this DLSS 5, hopefully when PS6/Xbox next releases .. might finally get a reason to upgrade my old rtx 3060ti
 
I'm glad to see that most people like it.
I guess the amount of genz/alpha furry artist on GAF is low.
For those who don't like it there's a OFF option so you won't have to use it.
Never understood the outrage around this, probably has to do with being Nvidia and AI than the feature itself.
 
I'm glad to see that most people like it.
I guess the amount of genz/alpha furry artist on GAF is low.
For those who don't like it there's a OFF option so you won't have to use it.
Never understood the outrage around this, probably has to do with being Nvidia and AI than the feature itself.
...Uh, most 41% is not most people. The other options are negative or neutral. And suggesting that only gen Z'ers hate AI sameface is quite the assumption.
 
...Uh, most 41% is not most people. The other options are negative or neutral. And suggesting that only gen Z'ers hate AI sameface is quite the assumption.
I was including neutral but you're right I should have phrase it "the majority are not haters". And considering how outraged and feisty DLSS5 haters are on social media, it really came to a surprise.
No one suggesting that "only gen Z" but ratter a strong demographic tendency.
 
Last edited:
I like options. So yeah I like it from that point of view. I was playing RoboCop Rogue City earlier and thought the faces could really do with a DLSS5 makeover lol. It would be cool if we could force it on older games. Sometimes it'll work sometimes it won't, but it'll be fun messing about with it and in the end, it's simply an option in the graphics settings.
 
I still don't get why it has to be so black and white. We can shit on and bitch about AI rightfully but pretending that this is not some mindblowingly amazing tech and (at a minimum) a generational leap in visuals over what we have is just plain insanity. No one thought such jumps are possible anymore and here we are. And I'm saying this as a console exclusive player. If ps6 will not do anything like this I will definitely go to pc if my wallet allows it.
 
Just catching up on the DF post regarding DLSS 5 -
"it doesn't have access to original game assets, geometry, depth or per-material metadata,".
Surely they should work on integrating this and it would solve a lot of the potential issues.
This is just the beginning, it has to start somewhere and can only imagine what will be possible as we move to DLSS6 and beyond, it's inevitable it'll start incorporating all those elements.
 
I still don't get why it has to be so black and white. We can shit on and bitch about AI rightfully but pretending that this is not some mindblowingly amazing tech and (at a minimum) a generational leap in visuals over what we have is just plain insanity. No one thought such jumps are possible anymore and here we are. And I'm saying this as a console exclusive player. If ps6 will not do anything like this I will definitely go to pc if my wallet allows it.
It's the AI boogeyman. You can't have an honest discussion about this, because there are a ton of people who screech about AI all the time and it doesn't matter if DLSS5 looks good, or great, or terrible, they're never going to get past their "AI slop" stance that they shit out whenever the topic comes up. And even that would be fine if they weren't so dishonest about why they hate the tech.

I've said this a thousand times about AI and it's always true. The version you are seeing today is the worst it will ever look. What you see today is not what you will see in six months, it will improve, and based on the AI improvement in general, it will improve rapidly.
 
Looks like a winner to me

TYDzI7sP50Uplkos.jpg
Bro are you sure you don't see things?
 
Playing kingdom come deliverance 2, and I recon it would be an excellent use case for this tech, bet it would look stunning.
 
It's the AI boogeyman. You can't have an honest discussion about this, because there are a ton of people who screech about AI all the time and it doesn't matter if DLSS5 looks good, or great, or terrible, they're never going to get past their "AI slop" stance that they shit out whenever the topic comes up. And even that would be fine if they weren't so dishonest about why they hate the tech.

I've said this a thousand times about AI and it's always true. The version you are seeing today is the worst it will ever look. What you see today is not what you will see in six months, it will improve, and based on the AI improvement in general, it will improve rapidly.
It's a shame that nowadays the "discussion" is like this about everything. I absolutely get the hate about AI and it's an existential threat in my opinion as well. But the tech is absolutely amazing. But for the people you talk about I guess I would constitute as a "traitor" just because I admit that it's mindblowing.
 
Last edited:
No, it looks completely different, not better.

As Digital Foundry now clarifies in their update, they think the models no longer look the same, the models lose fidelity with the original model, it loses the original intention, and it looks like a slop filter. It was even characterized as a "technical failure," how it changes the models.
I can't even tell if you really think that or if you're gaslighting me. Maybe I'm just a normie because all the DLSS 5 screens look better to me.
 
Maybe by the time this is runnable at acceptable framerates on midrange cards (that's gonna take awhile) it will be a lot more refined. But this is still messing with other peoples art.
 
I can't even tell if you really think that or if you're gaslighting me. Maybe I'm just a normie because all the DLSS 5 screens look better to me.
I am 100% serious. I think DLSS5 looks like shit, like the majority of people. You like it, fine, but it's the same as some people who love motion smoothing and vivid picture settings on TV; some people's taste is questionable at best.
 
DLSS 5 will be just like plastic surgery. Used judiciously it will make things look great and you will not notice a difference. Amateurs will look like clowns
 
Why don't they run their game through DLSS5 before shipping it, then send me that.

I gotta config this stuff to get told that it's my fault their game is shit?
 
I'm all aboard because of the upgrades seen in Starfield and Oblivion.

RE Requiem already looks fantastic so the tech is less interesting for that game considering the performance cost.
 
I am 100% serious. I think DLSS5 looks like shit, like the majority of people. You like it, fine, but it's the same as some people who love motion smoothing and vivid picture settings on TV; some people's taste is questionable at best.
That's fine, but you need to stop making declarative statements like, "I think DLSS5 looks like shit, like the majority of people." Even based on the results of the poll in this thread, that isn't true. DLSS AI upscaling got shit on by some people very loudly, to the point that many thought it would be a flop, it didn't and AI upscaling has become standard, and it became so popular AMD is constantly trying to play catch-up with it. Visuals are all subjective, you just come across as snob by questioning what other people thinks looks good. The market will determine if people actually like this and Nvidia hasn't missed yet.
 
Last edited:
It's terrifying that they're going to turn the characters from my beloved hobby into the same kind of trash that's being peddled on social media these days, full of fake, strangely perfect, and generic characters.

Nvidia has just released a trailer for the episode dedicated to video games in BLACK MIRROR....

black mirror GIF by Product Hunt
 
Last edited:
I'm gonna guess that most people moaning about this tech have used re-shades or mods at some point in their gaming life without worrying about ruining artistic intention.
 
I guess I just don't get the big fuss. I think it looks interesting.

Is it just that "anti-Ai" hate boner some have?
I like DLSS quite a bit in general but this looks terrible. Technology wise it's impressive but it looks absolutely terrible and literally looks like a shitty instagram AI filter.
 
That's fine, but you need to stop making declarative statements like, "I think DLSS5 looks like shit, like the majority of people." Even based on the results of the poll in this thread, that isn't true. DLSS AI upscaling got shit on by some people very loudly, to the point that many thought it would be a flop, it didn't and AI upscaling has become standard, and it became so popular AMD is constantly trying to play catch-up with it. Visuals are all subjective, you just come across as snob by questioning what other people thinks looks good. The market will determine if people actually like this and Nvidia hasn't missed yet.
You live in an alternative dimension if you think that most people don't hate DLSS 5.
Also, the negative AI options in this poll are spread across many choices, and the only "I like it" option is just one.
 
Last edited:
It's terrifying that they're going to turn the characters from my beloved hobby into the same kind of trash that's being peddled on social media these days, full of fake, strangely perfect, and generic characters.

Nvidia has just released a trailer for the episode dedicated to video games in BLACK MIRROR....

black mirror GIF by Product Hunt
They are not doing anything to your beloved hobby.
The gamer do by taking the fully conscious decision to turn it ON like any other custom mod, texture pack, shaders, filters.
For others like you there will be no difference from before.
A big nothingburger for something that is ultimately just hate toward Ai and Nvidia.
 
Last edited:
They are not doing anything to your beloved hobby.
The gamer do by taking the fully conscious decision to turn it ON like any other custom mod, texture pack, shaders, filters.
For others like you there will be no difference from before.
A big nothingburger for something that is ultimately just hate toward Ai and Nvidia.
That's what you think. That this is just like enabling an effect. It'll be like that at first, as they're innocently showing, but this is designed with the goal of creating video games with less effort, and every company is going to adopt it, not just NVIDIA PC graphics cards. When this comes to consoles, which it will in the next generation, there simply won't be a choice; games will be designed with the assumption that the console's AI will do "its part of the work."

I'm not saying the result is bad, it's surely spectacular, but after watching NVIDIA's video, it confirms to me that what's considered spectacular today is totally generic, fake, and simplistic.
 
That's what you think. That this is just like enabling an effect. It'll be like that at first, as they're innocently showing, but this is designed with the goal of creating video games with less effort, and every company is going to adopt it, not just NVIDIA PC graphics cards. When this comes to consoles, which it will in the next generation, there simply won't be a choice; games will be designed with the assumption that the console's AI will do "its part of the work."

I'm not saying the result is bad, it's surely spectacular, but after watching NVIDIA's video, it confirms to me that what's considered spectacular today is totally generic, fake, and simplistic.
This is a completely theoretical scenario with assumptions and a lack of knowledge where the tech will be in the future.
We can make doomsday scenario all day, the truth is we don't know.
For now the only certainty is that it can be turned off at will.
 
That's fine, but you need to stop making declarative statements like, "I think DLSS5 looks like shit, like the majority of people." Even based on the results of the poll in this thread, that isn't true. DLSS AI upscaling got shit on by some people very loudly, to the point that many thought it would be a flop, it didn't and AI upscaling has become standard, and it became so popular AMD is constantly trying to play catch-up with it. Visuals are all subjective, you just come across as snob by questioning what other people thinks looks good. The market will determine if people actually like this and Nvidia hasn't missed yet.
It was a terrible poll and if you actually look at the numbers, people really don't like it.
This is different than upscaling. It's a shit filter.
 
Last edited:
You live in an alternative dimension if you think that most people don't hate DLSS 5.
Also, the negative AI options in this poll are spread across many choices, and the only "I like it" option is just one.
Most people don't even know what DLSS 5 is. You live in an alterative reality if you think immediate outrage on the internet is reflective of how most people will feel about a product. I rather be right than first when casting judgment on a product I haven't even used. If you had gone off of YouTube comments and dislikes you would have thought no one would have purchased a PS5 pro as well. You really need to take your personal feelings about AI out of this and look at it objectively.
 
Last edited:
Most people don't even know what DLSS 5 is. You live in an alterative reality if you think immediate outrage on the internet is reflective of how most people will feel about a product. I rather be right than first when casting judgment on a product I haven't even used. If you had gone off of YouTube comments and dislikes you would have thought no one would have purchased a PS5 pro as well.

Or internet's loudness would make you believe that AMD dominates GPU sales going by any reddit PC subreddits or youtube. Loud is putting it lightly.

Same for DLSS 5

If you polled peoples in the street, they would pick AI grace almost all the time between both of them. Especially if you downgrade Grace to base console's inflatable doll look.
 
It's the logical next step. These ML based algorithms will allow real time rendering to punch above its weight. Can't rely on brute force forever, wasteful and expensive. No different to ml based upscaling or frame gem.

Things just need to find their place, but there is no getting away from it.
 
Wow at 40% yes. Nvidia's investment into OpenAI is one of few things keeping this crap alive. If you want affordable hardware in the future, keep bashing them.
 
Top Bottom