Riiiiight.Speevy said:If/when Sony manages to overtake it in sales, people are going to be madder than when the Dreamcast died.
The DS is Nintendo's Dreamcast. heh.
My wife could give 2 shits about nintendo, but she flips over mario kart and ouendan. It doesn't always have to be about brand loyalty.Prine said:no...
unless you're a nintendo fan
All you post about is football games. Why are you even in a nintendo thread?Prine said:Theres not one game that excites me on DS
Tritroid said:SNES was the pinnacle of gaming. The 'golden era'. So DS has a lot to do before it even comes close to SNES calibur.
...No.
Nope. That'd be the mighty NES. I'd also put N64, GB/GBC, SNES and GBA ahead of DS so far, but it's only been a year and the thing already has 300+ games confirmed.Prine said:It means DS is probably the best system ever for Nintendo fans.
Naked Snake said:I'm really puzzled by all the love the DS gets on this forum... I must be missing something, or is all that love just based on Japanese releases and future titles?
Himuro said:FINALLY SOMEONE ELSE AGREES (well, I think SNES is inferior to ps2 but not xbox and gamecube. I'm talking about the quality and NUMBER of quality games.)
Jesus, this is so screwed up on so many levels. At the very least:Prine said:It means DS is probably the best system ever for Nintendo fans.
surume said:All you post about is football games. Why are you even in a nintendo thread?
Mihail said:Jesus, this is so screwed up on so many levels. At the very least:
1. Most of the games people are getting excited about are not developed by Nintendo, so I don't see how being a Nintendo fan is related.
2. You're implying that people like the system and its games because they're Nintendo fans, which makes no sense. People become fans of a company because they like the company's games, not the other way around.
But, hey, if it makes you feel superior to isolate this "Nintendo fans" group, go for it.
SNES wasn't the best system ever for "all gamers".Prine said:He claimed it to be the best system ever since SNES, he's calling on all gamers.
Well now you could apply that same idea to PSX. :lolZer0 said:the pinnacle of gaming? snes time were awesome but the psx cataog is much better,nostalgia is a bad ally
I think SNES, GBA and Saturn all had better 1st years. It's 2nd year where DS is really looking to shine (like PS1/PS2).Himuro said:Best first year line up for any system ever.
But SFC RPGs > PSX RPGs...Himuro said:rpgs (psx covers that, psx rpgs > snes rpgs)
drohne said:notwithstanding buddyc's platitudinous waffling, we usually can reach something like consensus on the merits of a game console: i mean, not even a nintendo fan will nowadays claim that the gamecube was much good. so why this total schism of opinion on the ds? from where i'm sitting, there are like two ds games worth any money. and even allowing for tastes less fastidious than mine, ds software is in no way extraordinary. i fear that the overzealous ds bashing of months past has produced an equal and opposite reaction. and i fear that i may in my way have contributed to all of this. i think this thread would be an excellent place to start the healing. you can start by dropping this pretense that the ds library is anything better than adequate.
I'm a fan of clear writing. But a clearly written statement doesn't make it any more acceptable to call your subjective opinion an objective fact.drohne said:notwithstanding buddyc's platitudinous waffling, we usually can reach something like consensus on the merits of a game console: i mean, not even a nintendo fan will nowadays claim that the gamecube was much good. so why this total schism of opinion on the ds? from where i'm sitting, there are like two ds games worth any money. and even allowing for tastes less fastidious than mine, ds software is in no way extraordinary. i fear that the overzealous ds bashing of months past has produced an equal and opposite reaction. and i fear that i may in my way have contributed to all of this. i think this thread would be an excellent place to start the healing. you can start by dropping this pretense that the ds library is anything better than adequate.
drohne said:notwithstanding buddyc's platitudinous waffling, we usually can reach something like consensus on the merits of a game console: i mean, not even a nintendo fan will nowadays claim that the gamecube was much good. so why this total schism of opinion on the ds? from where i'm sitting, there are like two ds games worth any money. and even allowing for tastes less fastidious than mine, ds software is in no way extraordinary. i fear that the overzealous ds bashing of months past has produced an equal and opposite reaction. and i fear that i may in my way have contributed to all of this. i think this thread would be an excellent place to start the healing. you can start by dropping this pretense that the ds library is anything better than adequate.
Instigator said:Perfectly readable to me.
Drohne is still one of the best posters in the gaming forum. I always like how he cuts through the BS like a knife through warm butter.
Himuro said:Your opinion != fact
drohne said:i should know better than to humor matlock, but, uh...which word in that post struck you as "archaic?" "waffle," maybe? it's a popular breakfast food!
drohne said:notwithstanding buddyc's platitudinous waffling, we usually can reach something like consensus on the merits of a game console: i mean, not even a nintendo fan will nowadays claim that the gamecube was much good. so why this total schism of opinion on the ds? from where i'm sitting, there are like two ds games worth any money. and even allowing for tastes less fastidious than mine, ds software is in no way extraordinary. i fear that the overzealous ds bashing of months past has produced an equal and opposite reaction. and i fear that i may in my way have contributed to all of this. i think this thread would be an excellent place to start the healing. you can start by dropping this pretense that the ds library is anything better than adequate.
Drinky Crow said:Well, it took the DS a whole year to finally get a game I want -- Castlevania DoS, which I'll love *in spite* of all the stylus crap inadequately shoehorned into it.
Still, once again, I hafta laugh given that most of the excitement for the new DS content doesn't revolve around stylus-based "innovation" but the promise of sequels, remakes, franchise characters, and traditional content. Do you smacktards REALLY want a Revolution after all?
Drinky Crow said:Still, once again, I hafta laugh given that most of the excitement for the new DS content doesn't revolve around stylus-based "innovation" but the promise of sequels, remakes, franchise characters, and traditional content. Do you smacktards REALLY want a Revolution after all?
Matlock said:!
You're like a cut-rate Drinky with twice the vocabulary and half the literacy.
Matlock said:!
You're like a cut-rate Drinky with twice the vocabulary and half the literacy.
Prine said:It means DS is probably the best system ever for Nintendo fans.
drohne said:matlock, i'm sure i am borderline unreadable, but the problem here is that you're borderline illiterate. go to, wretch.
Cheebs said:After all this news today I am fairly confident it is. Hell, it might even surpass SNES. Anyone else feel the system looks just THAT good with the lineup coming out?
Get off your high horse. Your opinion is not worth more than someone else's, no matter how many people agree with you.krypt0nian said:This......is why people laugh at extreme Nintendo boys and girls.
TheJollyCorner said:Just a few of the games SNES had in its first year (US release): Super Mario World, F-Zero, Pilotwings, SimCity, Final Fight, Populous, Final Fantasy II (IV), ActRaiser, Super Castlevania IV, Contra III, Super Ghouls and Ghosts, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Gradius III, Super Mario Kart... just to name a few.
Does DS's first year objectively match that as far as new products go? It's also worth mentioning that most of these titles were 'the best anyone had ever seen' at the time.
I'd say no.