GamingOblivion
Banned
I can't see why he'd get hit with a ban. He didn't say anything too harsh.
I can't see why he'd get hit with a ban. He didn't say anything too harsh.
I love Huber, but his opinion on the DMC franchise kills me inside. DmC is so fucking bad, and it's easily the most disappointing misstep of all time among my favorite franchises. If I could erase the existence of any one game from history, it would be that one. Thankfully, unlike Huber I'm not actually in the minority in regards to whether people would rather see DmC2 or DMC5 get developed, so for the greater good a bit of disappointment has to go his way. Hopefully they'll announce DMC5 within the near future, so we can forget the "remake" ever happened.
He was right about EDF5 deserving the top spot on their podcast list though. When Jones wheeled out the "there'll always be another one in the future" argument against EDF, arguing for a musou game in its place, I almost did a spit-take.
WTF. What did Hasney do to get banned?
Aren't they perma when the avatar has gone?
Wish Huber could stream Dragon Quest 7. This game is pure jolly and although technically a prequel to 8, it feels like the follow-up that 9 and 10 never were.
Don't think it's possible though, Ben's Pokemon stream didn't go too well.
Nope. Mine always disappears, even when it's just a few days ban.
First of all, DmC is fuckin awesome. And may I remind you of DMC2?
Secondly, DMC5 wouldn't have happened yet anyway even if DmC never existed. That team was neck deep in Dragon's Dogma.
DMC2 being a bad game doesn't make DmC any less trash. DMC2 even gets some things right that DmC doesn't. And it's not like they released the reboot after the worst game in the main series anyway (so the DMC2 point doesn't really mean anything). I know DmC didn't delay DMC5, but a timeline where nothing came out between DMC4 and 5 (other than the rereleases) would still be preferable, regardless of how many years Dragon's Dogma delayed it (and the long wait would be worth it since Dragon's Dogma is a fantastic game in its own right). That's my entire point, the abomination should simply never have existed.
It's nice that there are people like you and Huber who like it, but I still think it was a gigantic mistake to split your fanbase like that (or rather create two seperate fanbases within an overarching franchise). They should just have had Ninja Theory do their own thing entirely, without associating it with the DMC name. The vast majority of the people who like DmC would probably have liked it anyway without the name and connection. I'm sure Huber would.
DMC2 being a bad game doesn't make DmC any less trash. DMC2 even gets some things right that DmC doesn't. And it's not like they released the reboot after the worst game in the main series anyway (so the DMC2 point doesn't really mean anything). I know DmC didn't delay DMC5, but a timeline where nothing came out between DMC4 and 5 (other than the rereleases) would still be preferable, regardless of how many years Dragon's Dogma delayed it (and the long wait would be worth it since Dragon's Dogma is a fantastic game in its own right). That's my entire point, the abomination should simply never have existed.
It's nice that there are people like you and Huber who like it, but I still think it was a gigantic mistake to split your fanbase like that (or rather create two seperate fanbases within an overarching franchise). They should just have had Ninja Theory do their own thing entirely, without associating it with the DMC name. The vast majority of the people who like DmC would probably have liked it anyway without the name and connection. I'm sure Huber would.
Problem there is who knows if I for example as a DMC fan would have ever played the game if it wasn't part of the franchise. Name sells.
And just the fact that DmC created a ''new fanbase'' already speaks that many see the game as a quality product. And these types of splits happen in almost every long running series reboots or no.
I don't see why you can't just ignore DmC if you don't mind having a long wait between 4 and 5 anyway. In fact if DmC never existed I can just imagine the amount of ''DMC is dead'' considering 4 came out almost a decade ago.
Mostly I don't understand the hate for the game from the core fans. Looking at other fanbases that get actual garbage games like Umbrella Corp. or whatever they just snicker for a while and forget about it. Of course it's fine to hate it and all but I don't see what the negative impact from it is when it didn't affect the development of 5 in any way.
DmC has a higher meatcritic than DMC4, calling it trash is hyperbole.
What happened to the ReCore video on YouTube? It has a time stamp of 16:15 and it just cuts off at that point.
Just remembered Bosman v. Wozniak starts an hour early tonight. HYPE.
Hmm. It was working just fine yesterday on my PS4, but not today (still PS4). I'm pulling it up right now on my iPhone's YouTube app and it's still giving me the same thing with the same 16:15 video length.I dunno, youtube randomly screws up the metadata somehow. It's playing fine on my PC, but I've seen it happen before. Check on another device?
It's nice that there are people like you and Huber who like it, but I still think it was a gigantic mistake to split your fanbase like that (or rather create two seperate fanbases within an overarching franchise). They should just have had Ninja Theory do their own thing entirely, without associating it with the DMC name. The vast majority of the people who like DmC would probably have liked it anyway without the name and connection. I'm sure Huber would.
The fanbase is only split because so many people formed an irrational opinion about the game before it ever came out. It's a game that looks great, has really inventive levels and a fun, irreverent story and, most of all, plays fantastically well. It's just too bad some turned their nose up at it because Dante is only allowed to look douchy in the original way, and not a new way.
The fanbase is only split because so many people formed an irrational opinion about the game before it ever came out. It's a game that looks great, has really inventive levels and a fun, irreverent story and, most of all, plays fantastically well. It's just too bad some turned their nose up at it because Dante is only allowed to look douchy in the original way, and not a new way.
You're wrong, because that assumes that it's a factually and objectively incorrect opinion to like the original DMC games and hate the reboot for what it is.
It is objectively impossible to pass judgement on the quality of a game 18 months before anyone has ever had a chance to play it and that's exactly what many Devil May Cry fans did.
I remember saying "sounds like bullshit" when some MS exec said something.
I got banned for 2 weeks for that.
2 weeks.
Tuesday
6 Month Celebration
4am - 2pm
Group Stream Party
Was this posted/known yet in detail? Awesome, though!
Oh I am in Korea, so times are all fucked up, sorry haha. Found it on their homepage shedule (easyallies.com on the right)Where did you see this and why does it start at 4am lol
DmC has a higher meatcritic than DMC4, calling it trash is hyperbole.
You think major publications are giving fake scores for the sole purpose of upsetting you in particular?Right and how much of that is because of trolling?
400k is a physical barrier, as impenetrable as the speed of light. Tetris' resistance grows exponentially the closer Kyle gets to that mythical score. He will never break it. It is futile.
The fanbase is only split because so many people formed an irrational opinion about the game before it ever came out. It's a game that looks great, has really inventive levels and a fun, irreverent story and, most of all, plays fantastically well. It's just too bad some turned their nose up at it because Dante is only allowed to look douchy in the original way, and not a new way.
I hope that 10 hour steam isn't "lets play videogames for 10 hours straight".
DmC has a higher meatcritic than DMC4, calling it trash is hyperbole.
It's weird, I was never a fan of their Just Played-series and always prefered their produced videos, but with their recent Mafia 3-preview...
While it was entertaining, I instantly distrusted everything said there. Huber(?) explaining it himself would have given it a certainly trustworthy-ness, that just not there with Jones reading what is half light-criticism of "could be bad/could be good" and half PR-gibberish. Mhhh. But since the content, or what is being said, would probably be the same, it might just be me. Still...
On Mafia 3 in general: I know I would probably like, be it a 7 or 9 game in the end, but I don't want to dish out 70 for the third entry in a series I've never played before - and I have no interest or opportunity to go back. :-/
Eh, each game had different expectations. DMC4 suffered because it was the follow up to the best game in the series, DmC benefited from not being as awful as a lot of people were expecting. Regardless, DmC was still the worst selling game in the franchise, so DmC fans just have to deal with being the minority.
Personally I never bothered playing it because Ninja Theory often came off as assholes mocking the series and its fans. Plus I was never a fan of Ninja Theory's tendency to go with flash over substance.