Cloudy said:Cool. I wanted to see this but no way I go to the movies to see a frikken' documentary lol
fbcamp said:The movie should have been shown on TV, no one should have to pay to see propaganda.
fbcamp said:The movie should have been shown on TV, no one should have to pay to see propaganda.
Alucard said:You can consider most films with any sort of message as propoganda though. The best example I can think of would be Fight Club. I guess your enjoyment of movies like that mostly depends on where you stand in regards to the issues they tackle.
2 : the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
3 : ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect
Haven't you guys seen those anti-piracy ads before movies in theaters?
Not to sound ideological, but it's not really up to Moore to "let" the public download his film. It's not the big stars (or producers) that piracy is really hurting, but the minimum wage stagehands, carpenters, etc. in the movie industry.
fart said:oh give me a fucking break. the people who stand to lose money if people stop going to the movies are the people with the largest investment in the media - those who have ownership, NOT those who are paid hourly and have no ownership.
those ads are classic appeals to emotion.
fbcamp said:I don't think there were any of those in the production of this film.
on a different subject, it's a mystery to me how they managed to spend $6 million on making this film... Wonder how much of that went towards feeding Moore.
Pochacco said:Haven't you guys seen those anti-piracy ads before movies in theaters?
Not to sound ideological, but it's not really up to Moore to "let" the public download his film. It's not the big stars (or producers) that piracy is really hurting, but the minimum wage stagehands, carpenters, etc. in the movie industry.