Chad Howard
Wasn't a 2026 date rumored? Same as Microsoft's next-gen Xbox.
I love how QUEST FIXES are included in this update. You mean to tell me 12 years later they’re finally fixing broken quests? Great work very NEXT GEN of you Todd!Chad Howard
Let's be real here, someone at Bethesda updated the .ini file in the console version. That said I would be surprised if the game struggles at 60fps, as the PS5 has no problem running PS4 games at 4k/60fps.
Well, realistically speaking I would expect it in 2027 at the earliest. I know TESVI was already in pre-production alongside Starfield, but I assume three years after Starfield's release sounds way too early if we will take current dev cycles for video games in consideration
F4SE will most likely break with the new release and as a result a slew of mods that rely on it. I recently started a new modlist with a GOG version of the game so I'm gonna keep that one in the back pocket, but I'm pretty keen to see the changes and if they've actually bothered to fix any obvious breaking issues (ala the weapon debris crash on RTX cards ~ there is a mod for that, sure, but still).
MS cannot even properly market their consoles, no chance those incompetant dumbasses can market a game correctly. Even a update when Fallout is redhot right now is beyond their means to market successfully.Has there been any previews of this update anywhere? I would think that something big like this where you are bringing a PS5/XBX patch to an older game like Fallout 4 that there would be previews of how its going to be.....??? If it's going to be just a drop of the patch on the 25th without any previews or details, then......
Microsoft?
If there're NO pictures/trailers, you can imagine it to be as bare bones as possible. New resolution, more fps. That's it
On PC there's also a mod for that
Microsoft is, simply put, best in industry when it comes to updating their games and offering them at good prices.
. The graphics were certainly improved from Skyrim, and were more than "good enough".
So we're agreeing that Microsoft charges for remasters then
I would recommend playing it for yourself. It's certainly still an RPG. It's just less hardcore than 3 or New Vegas. But I wouldn't buy into all the haters, honestly. Just play it and decide for yourself. It's certainly still a Bethesda-style open-word RPG. Warts and all.
Here's a list of 696 mild-to-major remasters that Microsoft provided for free.
F4 is just a free update, not a paid remaster. And everyone charges for actual remasters. Not a Microsoft-specific thing.
We really don’t know yet. They haven’t said much. We will find out tomorrow. I wonder if I should remove some mods first…
I answred Microsoft
Yes, they have. I only need to post 1 game that shows this, whether there are more or not doesn't matter. Halo MCC contains Halo Anniversary (a remaster) which was a paid game. It contained Halo 2 Anniversary (a remaster), a paid game. The MCC itself is a paid game. That'd 3 games. I'm done, my burden of proof is fulfilled. I don't need to post every game as that wasn't the question asked
Exactly, a remaster
But the original question was regarding remasters, not updates
Exactly, we agree, thank you
You can't read and also get your definition of remasters completely wrong. The wiki article you quoted even states, "There are 633 games that have been made backward compatible out of 2,155 that have been released for Xbox 360"
Exactly. We agree. But that wasn't the question asked
JackMcGunns
, please see above!
Well, not sure I understand the attitude, but thanks I will. Love my Series X, and my Switch. Don't have a PC, so dunno what you're even saying, but
No because then he doesn't have the opportunity to be a total dick for no reason, tho. So. LOL
And you didn't need to reply to me without reading the question and answer given, but you did, and then kept going. I'd have happily skipped off into the next thread
Call me names all you want, I'd rather be a dick than not be able to read basic English and back up my arguments without resorting to name calling
