Fallout 4 - PS4 screenshots (now feat. PNGs)
- Thread starter Kenzodielocke
- Start date
- Status
johnnydrama
Banned
I'm sure Bethesda also believes that even though 60FPS is possible with that graphical fidelity, cinematic 30FPS is the way to go for Fallout 4. That's what the fans demand, and to be honest, 60FPS looks way too gamey and sped up for a game like this anyway.
ISee
Member
I always thought this one was hilarious
Holy sh** it's the guy from Unity. Being a skinless mutant seems to extend your lifetime dramatically.
And I'll opt for the PC ver. so I can enjoy that AF at 60 fps
I already made a mistake and got the PS4 ver. of TW3. Never again.
So does that mean in the review thread if it scores highly or the next NPD thread if it sells well we won't get a bunch of people saying "But it looks shit!"
I doubt it.
Denton
Member
I know, right ? how dare anyone be negative about anything these days.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
The zero shadows even baked ones kills the immersion for me.
And they still would not be wrong for saying so. High scores foes not automatically dismiss the lack of graphical features that are pretty much standard in 2015 going into 2016.
Makes total sense, and I agree with that as well.
Vincent Grayson
Member
Nah, it's almost definitely the physics stuff. These games have a lot more shit to process at any given moment than most other titles due to the number of objects that can be picked up, move around when shit explodes, and so on.
Looks pretty good to me, even in comparison to New Vegas all pimped out with NMC and a few other visual mods, Fallout 4 still looks much better visually.
ENB and other injectors are really necessary to overcome some of that Gamebryo jank.
EDIT: Durante also pointed out a lack of AF, but is there even an AA solution in that shot?
I think the AO is where the image really fails.
The objects don't look like they belong in the world. If that makes sense.
Company releases screenshots of their game showcasing its graphics and locations in the game. People aren't allowed to discuss them?
Nameless
Member
I don't agree. But this is a really shitty DS2 screenshot I took last month..
The game looks markedly better in motion, as will Fallout, no doubt, but let's continue opening our assholes over some sourceless screens posted to some dude's imgur.
Nailed it
I hope that screeenshot you posted isn't supposed to represent "all pimped out". It doesn't have AF for Christ's sake, I had that activated in Morrowind back in 2002
Pai Pai Master
Banned
probably the kind of game that looks like ass in screenshots and good in motion
Jeez. The hell you have played until now. It's not. Absolutely. It's not even arguable.
Did you ever see Skyrim on console? Or Fallout 3 / NV? Bethesda games get thrashed in the process of trying to make them run passably on consoles. Skyrim just with the texture pack and downsampling looks like it comes from the futue compared to PS3 Skyrim.
orthodoxy1095
Banned
If the game was running at 60 and didn't have a dev with a history of bug-ridden console releases, yeah, I know I wouldn't be a bothered. But unfortunately, that's not the situation we're left with, and there are some justified critiques here.
going with joke post here for the sake of my own sanity
glassgannon
Banned
Well said. (Except for the lack of proper capitalization
a year of non stop programming after college does that to you lol...
i only put capitals where absolutely necessary , like classes.
edit: kek, just saw the username.
ok you would know.guess i need to work on it sometime soon.
packy34
Member
These weren't released by Bethesda. They were leaked by someone who has an early copy - probably without the inevitable day one patch - and they are in the terrible jpeg format.
TerryLee81
Member
Yeah, I only wear pants where absolutely necessary.
PNGs won't save those
I don't think JPEG it's the cause of this dated graphic.
Ah, the stench of bullshit....how I've not missed you.
If this was actually true then Dark Souls would be the one selling tens of millions. The underlying gameplay systems and their balance are comically bad when you actually start thinking about them with any semblance of depth in Bethesda games. This is pretty much never brought up when you see discussions about the positive aspects of Fallout 3 or Oblivion/Skyrim.
Okay. Maybe not blaming the producers and the game per se just from the screenshots, but WTH. An entire landscape with no shadows or AO. Are we back in 1999?
I don't know. The entire internet distribution has ruined it. We still have to wait the day one patch.. Have to pay more to enjoy it completed for an year or more. I would definitely play it for the fallout series sake. But the old days of gaming are gone for good.
I don't know. The entire internet distribution has ruined it. We still have to wait the day one patch.. Have to pay more to enjoy it completed for an year or more. I would definitely play it for the fallout series sake. But the old days of gaming are gone for good.
DirtyManos
Member
I mean, day one and all, but what the shit.
The IQ is just terrible, I really thought they'd at least get MSAA going on.
Well, PC it is, etc etc
The IQ is just terrible, I really thought they'd at least get MSAA going on.
Well, PC it is, etc etc
CyberPunked
Member
Well thankfully the PC version has GameWorks, so here's hoping for some of that gorgeous HBAO+
packy34
Member
Good thing that wasn't the only thing I mentioned in my post
luca_29_bg
Member
nope, is expected from bethesda! ^^
Cabbagehead
Member
Do you understand how sad this is? that it might need a graphically day one patch.
They saw Fallout 4 and screenshots and had to get it in before second page.
Just a rumor, hope it's true though. More optional settings the better.
VanCityGamer
Member
The ugly graphics and lack of hype from the press about what they've seen (nothing super impressive) has seriously bummed me out. This is supposed to be one of my most hyped games of all time...just not getting there. Don't really want to explore an ugly world for hundreds of hours. I actually thought Fallout 3 looked pretty good for its time. What I need is some glowing impressions from people who have the game. Which makes it disappointing that the embargo is so close to the release.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Or maybe people actually agree this shit looks dated in late 2015. How can you argue that? Oh wait...
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
The press seems to be under NDA at the moment. For all we know there will be a large amount of previews on Monday.
The textures are mostly fine really. This is the one tangible improvement from the previous RAM-starved games (that and the piss filter removal). But higher resolution textures will not solve problems like lighting quality.
That's a rumor, one I'm not inclined to believe.
Citing historical precedent, if FO4 did have Gameworks then Nvidia and Bethesda would have been advertising its inclusion for months.
- Status