If you're going to torrent, I can't even imagine using a public tracker...
Yep ,not a good idea especially for HBO shows like GoT...
If you're going to torrent, I can't even imagine using a public tracker...
You mean like iTunes, Google Play, and Amazon Video?
You mean like iTunes, Google Play, and Amazon Video?
Yeah I'm sure.
Don't worry, I'm not doing this in my free time or anything. My job is computer forensics on child exploitation cases. The majority of my targets use torrents and peer to peer networks to receive and distribute CP. I've seen people using this site in particular to find it.
Like those, but with actual reasonable prices. $4-5 to rent an HD movie for 24 hours, and $13 for a digital HD copy to "own" is just absurd. Even worse is TV shows, Season 1 of Game of Thrones in HD is $39 on Amazon for a digital fucking download. Yea sorry but no show is worth $40 for a digital copy of 10 episodes.
You mean like iTunes, Google Play, and Amazon Video?
Amazon video is not available in most countries. iTunes store does not have TV shows in my country and the movies are 8$ per rental. Moreover it requires a Mac or Apple TV to watch on the TV. Google Play is more readily available, but has less movies than itunes, and no TV show support. Video streaming services are a mess, at least outside the US.Sölf;210849651 said:Yes, but in a one place. And with sales. Many sales.
You mean like iTunes, Google Play, and Amazon Video?
You mean like iTunes, Google Play, and Amazon Video?
Amazon video is not available in most countries. iTunes store does not have TV shows in my country and the movies are 8$ per rental. Moreover it requires a Mac or Apple TV to watch on the TV. Google Play is more readily available, but has less movies than itunes, and no TV show support. Video streaming services are a mess, at least outside the US.
Steam would do nothing to change that. Everything is tied up in distribution rights that widely vary from country to country. Until physical media completely dies out, that's not gonna change, and even then all these companies worldwide will hold on to their rights to get their slice of the pie.The thing is movies and TV shows appear on different platforms so it's not like Steam. Which pretty much has everything. Also the prices are nuts and the sales garbage.
The existing options could be cheap, too, if the studios got their heads out of their asses.Steam is cheap though
These companies should go out of business if they can't adapt to how people consume media today. Local distribution rights are terrible for consumers in the internet age. Nobody wants to use 10 different services to watch their movies and shows. If it can be done for music and games, why can't it be done for videos? Maybe these companies should focus on adapting instead of suing people.Steam would do nothing to change that. Everything is tied up in distribution rights that widely vary from country to country. Until physical media completely dies out, that's not gonna change, and even then all these companies worldwide will hold on to their rights to get their slice of the pie.
The existing options could be cheap, too, if the studios got their heads out of their asses.
Local distribution rights suck, but they exist for a reason. Let's say Universal makes a movie, and they want to show it in France. They would have to:These companies should go out of business if they can't adapt to how people consume media today. Local distribution rights are terrible for consumers in the internet age. Nobody wants to use 10 different services to watch their movies and shows. If it can be done for music and games, why can't it be done for videos? Maybe these companies should focus on adapting instead of suing people.
Local distribution rights suck, but they exist for a reason. Let's say Universal makes a movie, and they want to show it in France. They would have to:
- Do a proper localization. Which requires understanding the local culture.
- Run a marketing campaign. Which requires understanding the local culture, and working with a whole array of media outlets.
- Reproduce the film and distribute it to cinemas.
- Reproduce the film and distribute it to retailers.
Think of that, and then consider all the dozens of other countries it may be distributed in. Universal doesn't want to do that. They don't even want to run subsidiaries to do it for them.
Even Canada, which is right next to the US, and speaks the same language, relies on different national distributors (like eOne) because it's such a major hassle.
You could argue that maybe the digital distributions rights shouldn't be included with the physical rights, but after all the legwork the local distributors do, it would be unfair to deny them those rights.
It's a whole rat's nest of contracts, but it's not gonna change anytime soon.
For this?
That ridiculous Simpsons episode really is true to life.
![]()
3. Television and movie streaming options are still atrocious. You don't notice this that much if you're living in the United States because Netflix, Hulu, etc. are pretty much perfect, but outside of the USA it's a completely different story. Netflix in European countries has a generally pretty mediocre selection so the ban on proxy's has ruined it for many, something like Hulu doesn't exist in many countries, HBO Go is a shitshow (it hasn't worked on my tv at all these past months) and the local options are mostly terrible ('Uitzending Gemist' in The Netherlands still streams everything at 480p instead of HD resolutions, it's absurd).
4. In order to watch many of the top rated US television shows in The Netherlands when they're broadcast, you basically have to torrent. Shows like Archer, Hannibal and The Americans have, as far as I know, never aired in The Netherlands for instance.
Again, that chance depends on the local distributors.If all of these was actually necessary, no one would actually download stuff that hasnt been prepared for their region.
Which is clearly not the case.
Piracy will always exist but give people at least a chance of acquiring certain media without having to resort to piracy.
Yea sorry but no show is worth $40 for a digital copy of 10 episodes.
https://torrentfreak.com/feds-seize-kickasstorrents-domains-charge-owner-160720/
How long before another site overtakes it?
Ten episodes = 100 hours of content if I'm not mistaken. That's a pretty good deal at 40¢ per hour.
By contrast, Uncharted 4 at full price costs $3 per hour. And that's assuming the game takes 20 hours to complete, which is a very conservative estimate according to howlongtobeat.com.
10 hours of content per episode? What series is that?
You're paying $40 for TEN episodes, each of which is an hour long afaik. 1 × 10 = 10.
..Which is 4$ per hour. 10 hours at 40 dollars means 40$/10h or 4$/h. That was some poor math, there.
You're paying $40 for TEN episodes, each of which is an hour long afaik. 1 × 10 = 10.
Oops, I'm an idiot. In my defense I'm at work so thinking about multiple thinks as I post. Still an idiot.
I think I overall point is still valid though, if a bit less extreme. A $40 season is about comparable to retail video game, if not slightly more favorable.
For this?
That ridiculous Simpsons episode really is true to life.
![]()
4. In order to watch many of the top rated US television shows in The Netherlands when they're broadcast, you basically have to torrent. Shows like Archer, Hannibal and The Americans have, as far as I know, never aired in The Netherlands for instance.
So basically you want Netflix (or whoever) to become the main financier of all of television, and establish a global monopoly. And then you want to pay not nearly enough to finance that service.This 100%. I'd pay 20-30 Euro a month for a service that streams ALL the series there are. When they come out. And with an English language option on all of them because forced German dubs are an insult.
Ten episodes = 100 hours of content if I'm not mistaken. That's a pretty good deal at 40¢ per hour.