• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Florida Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Miller reported that the FBI went to Todashev's apartment complex after midnight Wednesday morning to question him."

Why the fuck were the FBI approaching people after midnight?
Maybe they should wait until after he had a good nights sleep and breakfast when questioning people possibly involved with a murder and terrorist act.
 
The guy was a murderer and tried to murder an FBI agent, so the conspiracy theorists and terrorist apologists can go home now. Good to hear there's one less asshole on this planet.
 
Man, I hate conspiracies. I am completely trusting of my government and all of its federal agencies! They are righteous soldiers of justice who only every do right and are never deceitful.
I mean, an an armed FBI agent shooting a man to death in his home after hours of interrogation? Not suspicious at all! He must have been a murderous scumbag...its the only possible explanation, the FBI always knows it was doing, Big Brother looks out for us, God bless the USA, etc...
 

It is exceedingly rare for anybody being consensually interviewed by police to wind up dead. Unless you're suggesting police are incredibly incompetent across the board. Are you?

As if that stops you, as well. :p

I haven't said anything that suggests I know what happened. Because I don't. I do know that something went ridiculously wrong for a man who consents to be interviewed by police to be shot dead during said interview.
 

syllogism

Member
Man, I hate conspiracies. I am completely trusting of my government and all of its federal agencies! They are righteous soldiers of justice who only every do right and are never deceitful.
I mean, an an armed FBI agent shooting a man to death in his home after hours of interrogation? Not suspicious at all! He must have been a murderous scumbag...its the only possible explanation, the FBI always knows it was doing, Big Brother looks out for us, God bless the USA, etc...
Can you explain the motivation, if you are suggesting that it wasn't just a mistake/incompetence?
 

commedieu

Banned
Can you explain the motivation, if you are suggesting that it wasn't just a mistake/incompetence?

I think the facts we know, make this look horrible for the FBI. Visiting folks after midnight, and then shooting them (Being unaware how dangerous they are, yet.. there at midnight..etc..fearing for my life, blah blah)

Its a bit sad that this can happen to people, and there is absolutely no substance behind the information. How does this happen? Cant wait to not ever know..

You're never going to know the motivation, but that doesn't mean that this entire thing is something I wouldn't want happening to me, or anyone else. You can't just shoot people like this, and I imagine the FBI has procedures they follow when interrogating people at midnight, else they would always shoot people for fear of being struck.

Its like they walk in and turn their back to the subject, and ask questions.
 
"Rare" is not "never".

It is "rare" for police to fire their guns in the line of duty in the first place.

This is extraordinarily weak cross-examination. Never never means never. It's used to emphasize rarity. But, to humor me, can you link me to an example of police killing an individual during a consensual interview?

I think the facts we know, make this look horrible for the FBI. Visiting folks after midnight, and then shooting them (Being unaware how dangerous they are, yet.. there at midnight..etc..fearing for my life, blah blah)

I've now seen mixed reports about the time. One article said the interview was pre-scheduled for 7:30 pm. But regardless of that, it still appears the shooting occurred after midnight, which if it began at 7:30 raises questions about what was happening for 4+ hours.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
There aren't enough details to convict the FBI guy yet.
 

neoism

Member
lol smh I would NEVER speak a word with any law official without it being videotaped and my lawyer present... people are crazy...
 

Mashing

Member
Well, there's literally only one justified reason to shoot a person who is being questioned, and that's if the person has a violent outburst and the minimal amount of force required to subdue it safely is to shoot them. So either it's that or the shooting is not justified.

I'm inclined to believe that agent shot him with intent to kill. Being from Boston does the agent no favors. Sad, but I imagine his emotions were high.
 

Boogie

Member
This is extraordinarily weak cross-examination. Never never means never. It's used to emphasize rarity.

"Never" means never.

If you did not mean "never", you should not have used that word.



But, to humor me, can you link me to an example of police killing an individual during a consensual interview?

Ian Bush.

To which you will reply "Aha! that wasn't a consensual interview!"

To which I will reply "irrelevant to the point of the argument. Stump's post articulated when it is justified to shoot someone who is being questioned, which is when they present a violent outburst to the officer that requires such a use of force. You said that never happens, to which I took issue. Ian Bush applies, in my opinion, as he was in the process of being released when he had his violent outburst."

And of course, generally speaking, people have unexpected violent outbursts towards the police all of the time. It is not automatically a sign of police "fucking up."
 
"Never" means never.

If you did not mean "never", you should not have used that word.

Oh please.

Ian Bush.

To which you will reply "Aha! that wasn't a consensual interview!"

To which I will reply "irrelevant to the point of the argument. Stump's post articulated when it is justified to shoot someone who is being questioned, which is when they present a violent outburst to the officer that requires such a use of force. You said that never happens, to which I took issue. Ian Bush applies, in my opinion, as he was in the process of being released when he had his violent outburst."

It's not an example of what I asked for (although it is also a fuck up). I guess it never happens.
 

Emerson

May contain jokes =>
It's hard to see why they would say that he "began to feel threatened" if he was stabbed with a knife. I suppose that phrase could be from some unofficial source who didn't know what went down.

Sir please remove your knife from my abdomen I am beginning to feel threatened.
 
oKdUsas.jpg

Fucking Ricky Rubio.
 

Mii

Banned
CNN confirming Tamerlan was involved in a triple homicide 2 years ago along with the man shot today:

CNN said:
Deceased Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev participated in a 2011 gruesome triple homicide outside Boston, along with a Chechen killed early Wednesday during a confrontation with the FBI and Massachusetts State Police in Orlando, Florida, a federal law enforcement official told CNN. Ibragim Todashev not only confessed to his direct role in slashing the throats of three people in the killings in Waltham, Massachusetts, he also fingered Tsarnaev in the deaths, the official says.
 

akira28

Member
conspiracy theories are dumb. if they wanted to keep this guy quiet, he'd have been taken into custody or taken care of immediately after the bombing, not a month later.

you're assuming massive insurgencies or gigantic, top-down conspiracies. not intra-departmental rogue cells who would have limited numbers, and reach, and information. You guys suck at conspiracies. Who works for who? Who knows what? Etc. Etc. Have fun with it.

I have to guess the FBI would consider this a fuckup. In the old days of the bureau, an agent wouldn't hesitate to shoot you, no. But he wouldn't hesitate to kick your ass either. They needed this guy for information. It was just bizarre to hear about this.
 

Blinding

Member
He wasn't armed.

In the statement about Todashev’s shooting issued on the day of the incident, the FBI said that an agent, along with two Massachusetts State Police troopers and other law enforcement personnel, were interviewing “an individual” in connection with the Boston Marathon bombing investigation when a “violent confrontation was initiated by the individual.”

An agent sustained non-life-threatening injuries, later described by one law enforcement official as “some cuts and abrasions.”

Initial reports citing anonymous law-enforcement individuals provided conflicting accounts of what happened. Some law enforcement officials said Todashev wielded a knife and others suggested that he attempted to grab the FBI agent’s gun.

One law enforcement official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation, said Wednesday that Todashev lunged at the agent and overturned a table. But the official said Todashev did not have a gun or a knife. A second official also said Todashev was unarmed.

An official said that according to one account of the shooting, the other law enforcement officials had just stepped out of the room, leaving the FBI agent alone with Todashev, when the confrontation occurred.

The shooting followed hours of questioning by the law enforcement officials that had begun the night before.


Todashev’s father said after the shooting that he didn’t believe the FBI’s account of why they killed his son.

“My son could never commit a crime, I know my son too well,” Abdul-Baki Todashev, who lives in Chechnya, told the Daily Beast Web site. “He worked helping disabled people in America and did sports, coached other sportsmen. The FBI made up their accusations.”
 
No conspiracy here, since that implies a coordinated misdirection. Seems like its just the usual cops covering each other's asses thing, and they didn't even bother to decide on what they would "leak" to the press individually.

Funny to see all those posts belittling people about what they would do if a guy tried to stab them.

Cops covering anothers ass IS misdirection. Not armed with anything and shot. Convenient.
 
The agent fired several shots at Mr. Todashev, striking him and knocking him backward. But Mr. Todashev again charged at the agent. The agent fired several more shots at Mr. Todashev, killing him. The detective in the room did not fire his weapon, the official said.

Under the F.B.I.’s guidelines, agents can fire a gun at someone if they feel the person is a threat to them or someone else. The episode is being reviewed by a team of F.B.I. investigators who specialize in shootings and by the district attorney in Orlando, the official said.

At the news conference in Moscow, the elder Mr. Todashev said his son had been interrogated for eight hours in his home on the day of the shooting because he had refused to report to an official building for what would have been a third round of questioning. He said that judging from his son’s wounds, he had been shot seven times, including once on the crown of his head.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/31/u...e-attacked-fbi-agent.html?_r=0&pagewanted=all
 

akira28

Member
So...accused of killing dudes with a knife. Has to attack 3 armed with guns fbi agents\police dudes. with a knife. I guess it was important that he be consistant?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom