Tense.
Still a good result for Liverpool, isn't it?
Tense.
Still a good result for Liverpool, isn't it?
Tense.
Still a good result for Liverpool, isn't it?
Hard done by the ref. Really pissed me the fuck off.
Mancs crying on about that penalty
Not a word said about their goal though
The linesman is fuckung awful
Yep, can't help but feel robbed there at the end.
Just look at his positioning.
Mancs crying on about that penalty
Not a word said about their goal though
Mancs crying on about that penalty
Not a word said about their goal though
Good thing on GAF then we have level-headed, impartial and unbiased football fans, eh?
We were totally shite, and got an undeserved draw, but thank fuck we aren't Man City tonight
Complete saints in comparison
I hope Chelsea drops some points then. I want the PL to stay interesting and Kloppo-kun to succeed.
Good thing on GAF then we have level-headed, impartial and unbiased football fans, eh?
We were totally shite, and got an undeserved draw, but thank fuck we aren't Man City tonight
No one is saying it wasn't a penalty so I've no idea what you're on about.
Spurs are a better bet to challenge Chelsea this season based on current form.
Undeserved draw? Really?
Look at how many good chances we squandered. We didn't play the best we could but it was a good effort all-around. The team didn't give up and pushed for the win. It was a satisfactory performance.
I think you mean they would have beaten that United side by 3 or 4 goals.3 shots on target at home? lol. No.
1st half was dreadful, 2nd half was a minor improvement that lead to a goal that was offside. Terrible performance. Also the worst performance by Pogba so far, which is easy to say. Whole team were gash though. Even Mourinho admitted it was a poor performance.
If Chelsea were playing this game they'd have beat that Liverpool side by 3 or 4.
I think you mean they would have beaten that United side by 3 or 4 goals.
Liverpool would have beat them, amirite?
Also what is it with Guardiola's post match interviews? lol
Liverpool would have beat them, amirite?
Also what is it with Guardiola's post match interviews? lol
I know we can all get together and agree Guardiola is the real fraud, right?
I don't think my post said anything about Liverpool beating Chelsea, but if they beat us it wouldn't be by 3 or 4 goals. We were missing about 4 or 5 first team regulars today. I believe if we had Clyne and Matip, they wouldn't have scored.
A point is better than nothing but we really needed a win to close that gap up. City getting spanked is great but 3 points would have been better.
At least the unbeaten run continues.
Stoke(A), Hull(A), Leicester(H) and Watford(A) to play now before we have City(A).
Na I don't think he's a fraud, I just don't think he's had to manage in a league where you can get beaten by every team on their day, or where you have all 90+ players but everyone else is at least 75+ and not 60+. It's by far and away his biggest test as a manager.
Nice argument. He coached a Barcelona team with Messi, Xavi and Iniesta at their absolute peak a nice Spanish core that was winning things on their own, literally the easiest job in management. Pep, not satisfied, then went on to coach Bayern, a team that had just won the treble and literally won it's league by 25 points before his tenure, sadly he was always exposed in the Champions League as a manager that always needs his players to bail him out and with no tactical knowledge whatsoever.
So yeah, I do hope he has a hard time in the english league, he'll either get even more exposed or shut my mouth, I guess? The City job is definitely the hardest one he has taken, for what it's worth.