Yeah, I grew up in NY, obviously.
What I meant about it being "arbitrary" was not that different schools can't have different standards for what constitutes "being disruptive" (because of course it would vary from school to school in many instances), but rather that in
none of those cases should those standards be allowed to conflict with law/legal precedent, particularly where first amendment rights are concerned. In other words, one school can define "disruptive" as speaking out excessively when not called upon, and another can define it strictly as physical violence/disturbance, such as pushing over a desk or something; in
no case should they be allowed to define "disruptive" as "abstaining from the pledge", however. If it is the case that they are currently allowed to do so, then I feel that needs to be remedied by law, as it is an infringement of first amendment rights.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"