• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Freddie Gray case: Baltimore Police Officer found not guilty of all charges

Status
Not open for further replies.

maxcriden

Member
I figured new news --> new thread, but please lock if incorrect.

Prior discussion here: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1049793

Baltimore Circuit Judge Barry Williams on Monday acquitted Officer Edward Nero of all counts for his role in the arrest and death of Freddie Gray.

The judgment, following a five-day bench trial, is the first in the closely-watched case. Nero, 30, faced four misdemeanor charges of second-degree assault, reckless endangerment and two counts of misconduct in office.

Prosecutors had argued that Nero committed an assault by detaining Gray without justification, while the reckless endangerment charge related to Nero's role in putting Gray into an arrest wagon without buckling a seat belt. In closing arguments Thursday, Williams had skeptically questioned prosecutors about their theory of assault, which legal experts said was unprecedented.

Nero leaned forward after the verdict was read, and wiped his eyes. He hugged his attorneys.

Nero was the second of six city police officers charged in the case to stand trial. The first trial, of Officer William Porter, ended in a hung jury and mistrial last December.

Nero, a former New Jersey volunteer firefighter who joined the Baltimore Police Department in 2012, is one of three officers who were on bike patrol when they chased and arrested Gray in West Baltimore.

Gray, 25, suffered severe spinal cord injuries while in the back of a Baltimore police van, prosecutors say. He died a week later, touching off citywide protests. On the day of his funeral on April 27, rioting, looting and arson broke out, leading the mayor to institute a weeklong nightly curfew and the governor to call in the National Guard.

Nero's trial lasted six days, with the prosecution calling 14 witnesses and the defense calling seven before closing statements last Thursday.

Nero's attorneys had sought to minimize his role in the arrest, saying that he had limited contact with Gray. They also argued that Nero followed his training.

Following the verdict, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake called for "citizens to be patient."

"This is our American system of justice and police officers must be afforded the same justice system as every other citizen in this city, state, and country," Rawlings-Blake said in a statement. "Now that the criminal case has come to an end, Officer Nero will face an administrative review by the Police Department. We once again ask the citizens to be patient and to allow the entire process to come to a conclusion."

She noted the city is "prepared to respond" to any disturbance in the city. "We will protect our neighborhoods, our businesses and the people of our city," she said.

T.J. Smith, the police department's chief spokesman, said Nero will remain working in an administrative capacity while the police department's internal investigation continues.

"The internal investigation is being handled by other police departments. The internal investigation will not be completed until all of the criminal cases against the other five officers are completed because they will likely be witnesses in each case," Smith said in a statement.

DeRay McKesson, a Black Lives Matter activist who unsuccessfully ran for mayor this year, said "the Nero verdict is a reminder that we must continue to push for policies and laws related to the police department that explicitly call for the preservation of life and that have clear lines of accountability.

"I am reminded that this is one of six trials as we seek accountability for the death of Freddie Gray," McKesson added.

The next trial in the case will be that of Officer Caesar Goodson Jr, the driver of the van used to transport Gray. His trial is scheduled to begin June 6. His trial is to be followed by those of Lt. Brian Rice (July 5), Officer Garrett Miller (July 27), Officer William Porter (Sept. 6) and Sgt. Alicia White (Oct. 13).

Via:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/ma...ci-nero-verdict-20160521-story.html?gshghsafg
 
bunk-the-wire.gif
 
... this wasn't even an ambitious charge for him like murder or manslaughter, and they still fucking let this guy walk?

....

Fuck today Off-Topic I'm going back to gaming.
 
We're going to get to the sixth trial, sixth acquittal, and the mayor will be on the way out of office so they'll never have to answer the question about who was really responsible for someone dying in the back of a police van.
 
So many thoughts and feelings.

New laws to "protect" murderous American Police members + immunity when murdering Black Americans.

I think I want hold a class called 'American Murderers: U.S. Police and The Not-For-Blacks Judicial System' as a free class to college students.

I def don't think I want to raise my future children here.
 
City officials warned the citizens to "watch themselves, lest they also end up in the back of a police van". Good grief.

See you at Maryland Deathfest folks.
 

Kinyou

Member
Prosecutors had argued that Nero committed an assault by detaining Gray without justification, while the reckless endangerment charge related to Nero's role in putting Gray into an arrest wagon without buckling a seat belt. In closing arguments Thursday, Williams had skeptically questioned prosecutors about their theory of assault, which legal experts said was unprecedented.
I could see how the first charge could be defended with technicalities, but the second one should be an open and shut case.
 

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
if this is the guy who put him in the paddy wagon without putting on a seatbelt, he's probably the guy who had the best chance of getting prosecuted. either him or the driver.

sadly i'm guessing nothing will come of this for anyone involved.
 
I could see how the first charge could be defended with technicalities, but the second one should be an open and shut case.

Not really, the responsibility for securing the person in the vehicle falls back to the driver. By many accounts, the case against this officer was by far the weakest
 

jay

Member
So if the driver is convicted of something, all the others will then be charged as accessories to those crimes, right?
 
Good to know America is still on that "fuck black people" phase of the country's existence, I'll give it another 200ish years before we get to the "kinda like you" phase.
 

platocplx

Member
6 more to go. I think they will convict a couple of them, but its hard to pin some stuff on some of them its understandable, but SOMEONE should be punished for it.

I think many states need to inact laws for this stuff, these people are still citizens and there should be laws for unarmed apprehensions etc just so there is no more grey in police conduct in this realm its clear that officers are not making the right decisions in these scenarios especially in pursuits when the public isnt in danger.
 
And in the UK police officers have been sent to prison for manslaughter recently for not responding properly to a call for help. They never even touched the guy and were legally responsible for his death.

How can Americans let their police get away with this over and over?
 
Good to know America is still on that "fuck black people" phase of the country's existence, I'll give it another 200ish years before we get to the "kinda like you" phase.

As long as you keep to your place in the sports and entertainment industries (and keep quiet there, too), we love ya!
 
Still recalling that post that was like, "blacks have it better these days, you guys are just complaining, overt racism is over lol"
 
Didn't they use the argument that the reason he wasn't responsible was because it's the driver's responsibility to ensure prisoners are secured? Doesn't that mean that they just handed the prosecution their argument for the next accused officer who was the actual driver?
 
"This is our American system of justice and police officers must be afforded the same justice system as every other citizen in this city, state, and country," Rawlings-Blake said in a statement.

The exact reason why people are protesting is BECAUSE they aren't afforded the same justice system.
 

entremet

Member
The problem with this is that police and the judiciary are in cahoots. They're part of the same system. It's not an impartial process.

Then forget about jury's attitudes about convicting cops. That's another hurdle.
 

Christopher

Member
So someone innocent didn't go to jail. I guess Mosby didn't put enough evidence foward for the charges she laid on these officers.

I'm pretty sure the driver will get SOMETHING
 
The problem with this is that police and the judiciary are in cahoots. They're part of the same system. It's not an impartial process.

Then forget about jury's attitudes about convicting cops. That's another hurdle.

Is it any wonder he decided to pass on a jury trial?
 

commedieu

Banned
I'd say unbelievable, but..

Its unbelievable!

heh, its like that word has no real meaning anymore. Remember when you were actually shocked..? Ah, those were the days. Now its just standard. Police can kill blacks and other minorities and face no consequences. Thats the fact. So hard to swallow though, just got back from London/Spain. The difference in police state is amazing.

An old white woman, in london, said to me "its a shame about those black boys getting killed by the cops in the states." Just set me back because, hell, that clear statement is hard to find even in the more liberal parts of the country. Not to say it doesn't exist, it was just jarring to hear someone so far from home know exactly whats up. Meanwhile.. Go back to africa if you don't like getting murdered by police, etc, etc.
 
I haven't seen anyone in this thread provide or point to one piece of evidence that says this particular individual should be found guilty.

Does anyone want to try?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom