• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

GAF Economists or Majors get in here

Status
Not open for further replies.

vangace

Member
Is this assessment of the Nash Equilibrium correct??

img0403vf.gif


I think its wrong, why would Saudi Arabia produce at 12,10 when they can optimize at 20.8
 

Mr Gump

Banned
Damn i did this 2 yrs ago and it was bloody easy....now i cant remember wtf to do. I know it has something to do with the optimal position for both resources/products, but fuck my mind is dead.
 

Johnas

Member
vangace said:
Is this assessment of the Nash Equilibrium correct??

img0403vf.gif


I think its wrong, why would Saudi Arabia produce at 12,10 when they can optimize at 20.8

Read it this way:

If Saudi Arabia goes High Q, the best thing for Venezuela is to go Low Q (6 is bigger than 4 or 3).
If Saudi Arabia goes Medium Q, the best thing for Venezuela is to go Medium Q (10 is bigger than 7 or 8).
If Saudi Arabia goes Low Q, the best thing for Venezuela is to go Medium Q (18 is bigger than 1 or 15).

Now, if Venezuela goes High Q, the best thing for Saudi Arabia is to go Low Q (8 is bigger than 5 or 6).
If Venezuela goes Medium Q, the best thing for Saudi Arabia is to go Medium Q (12 is bigger than 9 or 10).
If Venezuela goes Low Q, the best thing for Saudi Arabia is to go Medium Q (20 is bigger than 3 or 18).

Since Medium, Medium ends up being chosen twice (more than any other option), this is the Nash Equilibrium. I would explain it in further detail if I could, but I can't find my notes (from last year) and I never needed a textbook for the class, the teacher gave us everything we needed.
 

vangace

Member
Ancestor_of_Erdrick said:
Read it this way:

If Saudi Arabia goes High Q, the best thing for Venezuela is to go Low Q (6 is bigger than 4 or 3).
If Saudi Arabia goes Medium Q, the best thing for Venezuela is to go Medium Q (10 is bigger than 7 or 8).
If Saudi Arabia goes Low Q, the best thing for Venezuela is to go Medium Q (18 is bigger than 1 or 15).

Now, if Venezuela goes High Q, the best thing for Saudi Arabia is to go Low Q (8 is bigger than 5 or 6).
If Venezuela goes Medium Q, the best thing for Saudi Arabia is to go Medium Q (12 is bigger than 9 or 10).
If Venezuela goes Low Q, the best thing for Saudi Arabia is to go Medium Q (20 is bigger than 3 or 18).

Since Medium, Medium ends up being chosen twice (more than any other option), this is the Nash Equilibrium. I would explain it in further detail if I could, but I can't find my notes (from last year) and I never needed a textbook for the class, the teacher gave us everything we needed.

It does make sense, Venezuela would have to move to medium as you said, 10>8
 

Yossarian

Member
I think your key misunderstanding was that both venezuela and Saudi Arabia react in order to optimize their opportunities.
 

vangace

Member
Yossarian said:
I think your key misunderstanding was that both venezuela and Saudi Arabia react in order to optimize their opportunities.

yep, i understand it now. Game theory has been giving me major problems yet its suppose to be one of the easiest chapters of price theory :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom