WARCOCK said:Bingo, i think TP is gonna get dinked on the control section because waggling is probably too much effort for his fat ass. Probably ****ing needs to take a rest after every hour and shit, i can easily see a "TEDIOUS CONTROL" remark coming.
:lolelostyle said:It did. He told the guy sitting next to him to move over so he could swing because the character faced to the right.
We seriously need a gif of that.
so it means you too will give this game 8.8 from the get-go?Dragona Akehi said:Isn't he left handed?
DUN DUN DUN.
Beezy said:WHAT. THE. ****.
To any one who's thinking about running into this thread and say that 8.8 is still a good score, SHUT THE HELL UP AND GET THE **** OUT.
CO_Andy said:Not everyone likes Zelda, folks.
It's a good thing that day isn't here or else a lot of people would read spoilers that they don't want to read.DarthWufei said:I was hoping this would happen, some day there will be a world without review scores and people will have to decide their purchases with only words. I can't wait.
el Croux said:
:lol :lol :lol :lolel Croux said:
I suppose that's better than being ignorant.bigmakstudios said:Not reading review. Jeff Gertsman (and almost everyone else at Gamespot) is an incompetent moron (see: Wii got a Wii video).
EBCubs03 said:This guy isn't even a good writer.
IAWTP.Slurpy said:The fact that he names a late game item and a late game area that I never knew about or have never heard about before shows how little regard and consideration he has for anyone looking forward to this game, and Zelda fans especially. No other review Ive read has done this- not ONE There isnt even a warning sentence. Utterly disgusting, and utterly tasteless.
This speaks more about Jeff himself than the score.
GhaleonEB said:I suppose that's better than being ignorant.
I can kinda understand the reaction to the score based on how good everyone wants it to be, and based on other reviews. But to the point where you're going to call him, and the entire company he works for, names without even reading the review, much less not playing the game?
Holy shit. Over-reaction total.
Slurpy said:DO NOT READ!!!! THE ****ER POSTED MASSIVE SPOILERS ABOUT LATE GAME ITEMS!
There's no finesse to the way the Wii Remote is used, and at times you'll wish that you could just hit a button to swing the sword instead of dealing with all the motion-sensing nonsense. This is especially true in the rare cases that require you to time your sword swings properly, as well as once you start learning a few extra moves, like the shield bash, which is done by shoving the Nunchuk controller forward. Most of the time, performing this move resulted in a spin attack. The combat controls using the Wii Remote may feel somewhat different from past games, but it doesn't draw you into the experience any more than using a standard controller would, and at worst, it's imprecise.
DrLazy said:Basically he's calling it an OoT expansion pack.
I read the review. He makes some interesting points, but throughout the review he sounds like he didn't really enjoy the game. Except for the puzzles, virtually every part of the game has major set backs not fully orchestrated, combat is weak, sword fighting with Wiimote is pointless, bosses are two easy and most of all, the game does not "evolve" and relies to heavily on old formulas and nostalgia.
I haven't yet played the game, but after reading the review I have to wonder if the reviewer is holding the game up to an unattainable standard.
You don't have one. Anybody can read your trolling posts on GameFAQS you know.neojubei said:i'll sell my xbox 360 in protest.
Nameless said:Gamespot gave Perfect Dark Zero a 9.0
just sayin...
So did over a quarter of all reviews for that game.Nameless said:Gamespot gave Perfect Dark Zero a 9.0
just sayin...
evolution said:I guess everyone acts the same way when their beloved game recieves an underwhelming score. Just pretend you didn't see it, besides has that score really affected your purchase decision.
Aika'svyse said:Wait so i shouldn't buy the game now.