Things are going to change pretty quickly out there.
Not sure if the production was done generatively or just the voices.Is this from that google music ai?
Thing was surprisingly good when I tried it out once.
Bard, though, is a terrible llm
Might be Elevenlabs. I think that was the one which was used to create those "Presidential banter memes" that are floating around the web.Is this from that google music ai?
Thing was surprisingly good when I tried it out once.
Bard, though, is a terrible llm
Tmz and a few other sites seem to claim it was all ai from instrumentals to vocals.Not sure if the production was done generatively or just the voices.
this was created with nothing but the use of AI programming -- meaning there wasn't a human involved in the making of what sounds like a banger
I think elevenlabs has stronger copyright protection so using famous voices is more difficult now. They updated their tos to specifically state that anyone who uses voices without authorization is liable for any legal repercussions. I'm not sure thoughMight be Elevenlabs. I think that was the one which was used to create those "Presidential banter memes" that are floating around the web.
Well, you best buckle up. Some instance of frauds and scams are emerging using these tools.(...)
godamn, the sci-fi books didn't warn us about this specific technological upheaval
Things are going to change pretty quickly out there.
Sure can. People used AI to finish Beethoven's unfinished 10th Symphony.Can it do real music tho?
Who knows. The reaction is certainly different than with image generation. Takedowns have wiped this song off the internet to "protect artists". Did Arsestation and Devilant Art do that for artists who keep their platforms alive? It shows that music still has some cultural impact and sense of ownership, while images have nearly none, and have long democratized to a point of free for all.Cool, this should help push towards laws against AI using current artists assets.
Yeah, most depictions of AI generally adhered to the trope of AI being bad at matching people at being 'creative'. Guess reality proves that wrong.I find it interesting that instead of in industry and manual labor, AI currently seems to be destroying artists jobs at a more rapid pace. I personally didn't see the creative sphere as the ones hit hardest by this at first.
RIAA and the IP trade association sector now have their next crusade.
Yep such a double standard.Shit moving too fast again. It was only a few weeks ago when someone posted a thread of AI music and it sounded garbled. Super hard to swallow years ahead.
Who knows. The reaction is certainly different than with image generation. Takedowns have wiped this song off the internet to "protect artists". Did Arsestation and Devilant Art do that for artists who keep their platforms alive? It shows that music still has some cultural impact and sense of ownership, while images have nearly none, and have long democratized to a point of free for all.
The issue out of the gate is ai can only generate things based off history.
Ai takes from information stored on the internet. It creates things by grabbing data that already exists. Things that have already happened or been created.Huh?
They'll take that fight.The problem is that they'll be fighting 1000 different fires.
I think a lot of people in creative industries should be really worried about this, if they're not already.
There'll also be a lot of people who knew this was coming (like me) but who didn't think it would go from possible one day to happening right now in the blink of an eye.
It's only different because image artists don't have record labels behind them. These are the people that lobbied governments to change laws across the world in their favour. Image artists don't have that level of protection. Or rather, not 'protection of artists', but 'protection of content', which is important.Shit moving too fast again. It was only a few weeks ago when someone posted a thread of AI music and it sounded garbled. Super hard to swallow years ahead.
Who knows. The reaction is certainly different than with image generation. Takedowns have wiped this song off the internet to "protect artists". Did Arsestation and Devilant Art do that for artists who keep their platforms alive? It shows that music still has some cultural impact and sense of ownership, while images have nearly none, and have long democratized to a point of free for all.
Yes it would be great for governments to tell us what we can and can't listen to for music. You can't stop a truly decentralized democratized form of network without shutting the whole internet down.Cool, this should help push towards laws against AI using current artists assets.
Yes it would be great for governments to tell us what we can and can't listen to for music. You can't stop a truly decentralized democratized form of network without shutting the whole internet down.
People said electronic instruments and computers would ruin music too. But this is a good song.
Drake Ft. The Weeknd - Heart On My Sleeve ( IA )
Drake Ft. The Weeknd - Heart On My Sleeve ( IA )odysee.com
This song may be better.
Michael Jackson - Get Lucky (feat. Daft Punk) (AI cover)
Michael Jackson - Get Lucky (feat. Daft Punk) (AI cover)odysee.com
You can't stop a truly decentralized democratized form of network without shutting the whole internet down.
Yup. And we won't be the last. Imagine we're only now beginning to scratch the surface of AI.I find it interesting that instead of in industry and manual labor, AI currently seems to be destroying artists jobs at a more rapid pace. I personally didn't see the creative sphere as the ones hit hardest by this at first.
Ai takes from information stored on the internet. It creates things by grabbing data that already exists. Things that have already happened or been created.
Like if you ask it to make music it finds all the music already created to use as a reference. If there is no new voices or ideas to make new music it will just continually draw from the same sources.