http://i735.photobucket.com/albums/ww353/soxinthebox/doritopope.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
lmao
http://i735.photobucket.com/albums/ww353/soxinthebox/doritopope.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
lmao
Thumbs up
So if you don't give a shit about this that means you have more noble, valuable thoughts and priorities?
People that think there's some serious issue with advertising some chips and soda have mental problems.
While sitting next to which fine beverage and snack products?
Again, do you know what a journalist is? I don't think you do.
Way off in left field analogy that doesn't make any sense.
Football players can't influence or endorse people to buy products with their opinions or words, they can be in Nike commercials and Deodorant commercials, but their opinions don't sway anyone, they can't for a ton of reasons.
One of them being you can't buy $60 of football based on a football player's opinions or reviews.
This post brought to you by Prozac.People that think there's some serious issue with advertising some chips and soda have mental problems.
Geoff Keighley, meanwhile, is sitting beside a table of snacks. A table of delicious Doritos and refreshing Mountain Dew. He is, as you'll see on Wikipedia, "only one of two journalists, the other being 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace, profiled in the Harvard Business School press book 'Geeks and Geezers' by noted leadership expert Warren Bennis." Geoff Keighley is important. He is a leader in his field. He once said, "There's such a lack of investigative journalism. I wish I had more time to do more, sort of, investigation." And yet there he sits, glassy-eyed, beside a table heaving with sickly Doritos and Mountain Dew.
It's an important image. Study it.
Do you know what the purpose of a job is? To pay your bills and put food on the table. They can't work for free.
To those who are so offended by Keighley:
Encourage more mainstream journalists (ie, NYT, WSJ, WaPo, Fox News, MSNBC, etc) to cover your games instead of ripping them whenever they have an opinion that doesn't match the Gaf-videogame-elitist-theory.
Also:
![]()
If Mountain Dew has such control over the gaming industry, MetaCritic scores, funding of videogames, etc., why hasn't there been a critically acclaimed Jet Moto game in 10+ years?
What response is there? I mean I understand he's a working stiff like everyone else. Maybe gametrailers or spike made him do it. That's fine, but it doesn't exonerate him from the charge that he's a supposedly objective journalist that sold out to the people he's supposed to be examining as an independent unswayable source. It doesn't change the impression that everyone in his profession is controlled by the ad dollars.
He seems like a cool dude. The hate should be reserved for something more dubious.
Do you know what the purpose of a job is? To pay your bills and put food on the table. They can't work for free.
I'm pretty sure the job description of a journalist doesn't include being paid to hock fucking snack and soda products, as well as big name video-games.
If that's what they think their job entails, then they're in the wrong damn "profession".
![]()
TEDDY BRUSCHI AND BILL BELICHIK MUST ANSWER FOR THIS GRIEVOUS PRODUCT PLACEMENT
He actually does have a GAF account. GeoffmkGeoff I didn't know you had a GAF account!
That's not your place to say that.
How about they get paid for legitimate reasons and not be scrutinized or they get paid for illegitimate reasons and get scrutinized. You can't have it both ways, sorry.
I haven't followed Doritosgate, but from what I can gather people are upset because he did a Halo 4 video with some doritos and mountain dew used as product placement. Is that it?
Do you seriously not understand what a journalist is?That's not your place to say that.
Do you know what the purpose of a job is? To pay your bills and put food on the table. They can't work for free.
Do you seriously expect game journalists to work for free?
Let the market decide what a journalist is, commie.Do you seriously not understand what a journalist is?
Advertising is not illegitimate, unethical, or wrong. Period.
My post was a blatant joke, but then you took it seriously.
...
And then said two of the most untrue, stupid statements (sentences 2 and 3) in this thread. Football players opinions don't sway anyone? "You can't buy $60s worth of footballs."
wut
Advertising is not illegitimate, unethical, or wrong. Period.
Read this post recapping the important events. Keighley's contribution to the entire mess is pretty minimal at best.
Why are you making points up?
Do you seriously not understand what a journalist is?
So the whole brouhaha is over gaming journalists/reviewers being marketing shills for devs/publishers, basically?
Keighley is what we thought he is; he is what we thought he is. We played Bonus Round in in some janky browser player who the hell takes a third of a show and releases it every week like it's bullshit, bullshit!? We played Bonus Round in thirds everybody played three Bonus Rounds Geoff is who we thought he was! And that's why he did the Doritos/Dew interview. Now if you want to crown him the Doritos Pope, then crown his ass! But he is who we thought he was, and we let 'em off the hook!
Again, do you know what a journalist is? I don't think you do.
This made me laugh far more than it should have. Thank you.And it's not like he was pimping cigarettes. It's junk food. Who cares?
I'd be surprised if MarketingGAF even knows what shame is.Oh believe me, I know journalists have their own skeletons in their closets. This guy is trying to downplay the situation by stating that shameless shilling is a part of the trade.
Wait, I see the problem. There are people that trust the integrity of journalists and expect them to only ever present the truth.
Here, I'll let you know a secret. Journalists are people like you and me. They went to college and got a degree in journalism usually, but usually not for video games journalists. Video game journalists are dudes who played a lot of video games and found someone to pay them to write about video games. Anyway, that's it.
They're just people. They report from their perspective. They hide a million biases, known and unknown, behind their neutral facade. Many of them don't very much about what they're reporting, and have to rely on others to make informed opinions. They are just as prone to group think as anyone else. They are just as prone to making mistakes as anyone else. They have opinions like everyone else.
I keep imagining some poor dude crying in the street, holding a copy of some shitty game to the sky as the rain pours down. "Why, Geoff, why?! I trusted you when you said this game was the most exciting third person shooter of the year! And it's terrible! WHY???!!!" And then, in that moment, the dude remembers, and it all comes together. The game's closing credits. Promotional consideration for Dudebro3: The Shoot/Slicening was provided by Doritos. Geoff - he is paid by Doritos. Oh.... no.... Geoff has betrayed us all for a few over-flavored chips. The precious opinions on video games we all relied upon were just lies! The dude's tears washed away by the rain, he is left with only cold fury. Geoff will feel his rage - oh yes, he will pay! Because now, the dude is going to blog about this - on the internet. I hope you enjoyed your Doritos and Dew while it lasted, Geoff - because now, he will link to his blog posting on his Twitter account - hashtag Doritogate.
More or less (or at the least, Wainright possibly being an example of a larger trend in the industry). Had things ended with Florence's articles, I doubt there would even be a real "Doritosgate" as opposed to people being like "Huh."
When during a football game does a football player stop and hunker down to talk about why Nike and Gatorade are the best respective products? When is there a 20 minute interview with a football player where he talks about how refreshing Gatorade is and how it turns him into a real athlete?
Football players endorse things with their image alone, not with words or opinions.
Also reread my post, you paraphrased it in the most idiotic way possible.
None of those analogies match up to this. None.