They're called "Pregnancy Resource Centers" or "Crisis Pregnancy Centers". The grant is awaiting Governor Nathan Deal's signature.
AP: "Grant program for anti-abortion centers passes Georgia House"
The Guardian:
AP: "Grant program for anti-abortion centers passes Georgia House"
ATLANTA (AP) Georgia would provide state-funded grants to "pregnancy resource centers" that offer medical care, counseling and other services to pregnant women while discouraging abortion, under legislation that easily passed the state House on Friday.
The state Senate approved the measure on party lines last month. Senators must agree to some minor changes before the proposal can head to Gov. Nathan Deal's desk.
To be eligible, facilities cannot encourage or discuss abortions as an option or refer women to clinics that perform abortions, except when the mother's life is threatened.
Other states, including Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, have similar programs benefiting pregnancy centers.
The bill's sponsor, Republican state Sen. Renee Unterman of Buford, has said she wanted to provide a "positive" response to videos released this summer by abortion opponents showing Planned Parenthood officials discussing procedures for obtaining tissue from aborted fetuses for research.
A Texas grand jury later cleared the organization of wrongdoing, instead indicting two activists for their actions while making the undercover videos.
Democrats opposing the bill argued the centers use deceptive advertising to bring pregnant women in, and then refuse to discuss or discourage abortion regardless of a woman's opinion. They also argued that state money for sex education programs and parenting classes or counseling programs is a more successful way to decrease abortions.
"That's how you support the women of Georgia," Rep. Stacey Evans, D-Smyrna, said. "Not this bill."
The Guardian:
Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are non-medical facilities that seek to counsel women out of having abortions. Many of these clinics have confusing names and advertising that suggest they provide abortion services, and others provide misleading medical information to discourage women from having abortions.
Often counselors will tell women that condoms are ineffective, that they will be unable to get pregnant again if they have an abortion, and that abortion and birth control cause cancer. There are more than 4,000 CPCs in the US and at least 12 states fund CPCs directly.
During debates on the bill, only female representatives spoke in opposition to its passage.
If you want to decrease abortion, then lets invest $2m in sex ed, state representative Stacy Evans said on the statehouse floor Friday.
Were going to give $2m out to organizations not even licensed by the State of Georgia to provide medical care in any way? said Staci Fox, the CEO of Planned Parenthood Southeast. If this is really about providing access to women, shouldnt we be concerned about who it is that is giving that access?
Fox also notes that the bill seems particularly misplaced in the midst of an epidemic of rural hospitals closing throughout the state of Georgia. A 2014 USA Today report found that five rural hospitals in Georgia had shuttered in a two-year period. At that time, an additional six rural hospitals faced precarious financial circumstances.
The proposal comes as access to abortion services narrows across the south, and a case before the US supreme court tests the validity of restrictive laws that have shut down clinics in surrounding states. According to the Guttmacher Institute, in 2011, 96% of Georgia counties had no abortion clinic, with 59% of Georgia women of reproductive age living in those counties.
When it comes to states providing funding directly to CPCs, historically there is no requirement to ensure that the information women receive from the centers is medically accurate, said Elizabeth Nash of the Guttmacher Institute. It is documented that there are crisis pregnancy centers that provide inaccurate or misleading information to women, and it would be helpful to ensure that the information women receive especially when provided by public funds is medically accurate and appropriate.
The main crux of the problem is that CPCs project themselves to be comprehensive womens healthcare centers, and course theyre not, said Dr Serina Floyd, an OB-GYN and fellow of Physicians for Reproductive Health.
More in the links.In 2015, 10 budget bills were passed and signed into law in nine states with line items funding alternatives to abortion care, ranging from a $338,846 pregnancy maintenance initiative in Kansas to a two-year, two-million dollar allocation of funds in Minnesota for positive abortion alternatives to a $9.15 m allocation for alternatives to abortion in Texas.