MisterHero said:RIPPeter Venkman
I don't want it anymore
Oh come on,
I think I'd enjoy Ghost Peter running around the firehouse being a smartass without a care in the world. Definately a different approach to the mentor/student relationship
MisterHero said:RIPPeter Venkman
I don't want it anymore
Yep, I'm out.MisterHero said:RIPPeter Venkman
I don't want it anymore
Kletian said:Oh come on,I think I'd enjoy Ghost Peter running around the firehouse being a smartass without a care in the world. Definately a different approach to the mentor/student relationship
MisterHero said:Sure that could be entertaining and the best thing I could hope for. Hopefully he doesn't end up like the Librarian or the Scoleri Brothers. I just want the conclusion to Peter/Dana/Oscar's story as well as continuing the Ghostbusters story and this just provides the potential for so many distractions
Kletian said:and I'm sure it' will end with some valiant sacrifice that Ghost Peter has to be trapped/destroyed/whatever along with the villian in order to save Oscar's life
Go go cliche' go.
I have some script ideas for Akroyd and Ramis. Look at THE REAL GHOSTBUSTERS CARTOON. The series had episodes that were better than GB2
Booser said:BOOGEYMAN
NR1 said:Cinemablend.com says they know whom the villain of Ghostbusters 3 will be:
Apparently as recently as this summer, the writers were basing the central mythology of Ghostbusters 3 around Zoroastrianism, an ancient religion that focuses on the war between good and evil. The central baddie of the whole thing is Ahriman, "the god of darkness, the eternal destroyer of good, personification and creator of evil, bringer of death and disease."
Sounds like a good concept and is more in line with Gozer and the Sumerian civilization concept rather than Vigo the Carpathian.
Agreed on both fronts. GBII is an underrated sequel and Murray's unwarranted hatred of it only feeds into other peoples' unwarranted hatred. It's really unfortunate.NR1 said:I will never understand why Murray has such a deep seeded hatred for GB2. It is a fine film, despite what some people say. Plus, I would think that he would be more open to a third film after have such a positive experience on the video game.
NR1 said:I will never understand why Murray has such a deep seeded hatred for GB2. It is a fine film, despite what some people say. Plus, I would think that he would be more open to a third film after have such a positive experience on the video game.
...
According to New York Magazine's Vulture, the division lies in Columbia's desire to have a hot young director take over the third film in the series. But Reitman has a decades-old deal in place that gives him creative control over the films, including director approval. As the site puts it, "While it's true that Reitman can't force Columbia to make Ghostbusters 3 with him, he can make it nearly impossible for the studio to make the film without him."
...
The second draft of the new film's script (by The Office writers Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky) is in progress right now and due in May. Columbia apparently was hoping that if Reitman became busy with another project -- like his just green-lit Ashton Kutcher/Natalie Portman comedy Friends with Benefits (previously known as Fuckbuddies -- he'd let someone else take over on Ghostbusters. That doesn't look to be happening, however.
"Insiders familiar with Reitman's plans say he thinks the two comedies are not mutually exclusive, and still plans to direct both, raising serious questions about whether Sony will want to proceed with Ghostbusters 3 at all," says the site. "However, losing Ghostbusters would make a tough 2011 even tougher, as the studio has no other franchise blockbuster scheduled."
GQ: Is the third Ghostbusters movie happening? What's the story with that?
Murray: It's all a bunch of crock. It's a crock. There was a storyand I gotta be careful here, I don't want to hurt someone's feelings. When I hurt someone's feelings, I really want to hurt them. [laughs] Harold Ramis said, Oh, I've got these guys, they write on The Office, and they're really funny. They're going to write the next Ghostbusters. And they had just written this movie that he had directed.
Year One.
Year One. Well, I never went to see Year One, but people who did, including other Ghostbusters, said it was one of the worst things they had ever seen in their lives. So that dream just vaporized. That was gone. But it's the studio that really wants this thing. It's a franchise. It's a franchise, and they made a whole lot of money on Ghostbusters.
Oh, sure, I remember. The soundtrack. The lunchboxes. The action figures.
Right. And it's still one of the biggest movies of all time. And ever since that story broke, everywhere I go people are like, "So are you gonna make that movie?" I was down in Austin at South by Southwest, and you go at it hard down therefun but, man, you need to sleep for days afterwards. Anyhow, I got into it one night with a bunch of younger people who were like, Oh, I love Peter Venkman! I grew up with Peter Venkman! We got to talking, and the more we talked about it, the more I thought, Oh Christ, I should just do this thing.
A generation awaits, for sure. You weren't even supposed to play that role, right?
Yeah. Originally it was Belushi. Like a lot of my movies. [beat] God, John died, what was it, twenty-five years ago?
OnPoint said:I don't know if I'd want it anymore at this point. I'd go see it either way, but I wouldn't be expecting much
Oh well. Better left dead at this point
Vyer said:It's a shame that Murray seems to have become one of those 'bitter about being famous' type of guys. I guess there was a falling out between those guys? I don't know.
Being a snarky, bitter, cynical type was always his calling card, but any time I see him /read an interview with him it seems like he's taken it to heart.
I mean, really, how out of touch do you have to be to be surprised there's a whole generation out there that liked Peter Venkman?
disappeared said:To play devil's advocate here, partly it's our fault. We've been the ones hounding him the last ~15 years over this. From the get-go it was always a toss-up whether GB3 would ever see the light of day. Murray didn't (doesn't) know. He plays Venkman and that's it. It's up to Ramis and Akroyd to get a good fucking script. By the sounds of it Murray has read those scripts and remains unimpressed. Perhaps he's a little jaded, but we're the ones who have been after him all these years. He's getting older, and him saying, "fuck it" really isn't that hard to grasp.
Honestly, let the series live its golden years with the old films and the video game.
KibblesBits said:He doesn't seem excited about anything lately. I wish he'd just retire.
He thinks they're still filming.Shaneus said:So he wasn't acting in Lost in Translation?
:lolShaneus said:So he wasn't acting in Lost in Translation?
PowderedToast said:to say murray doesn't care about anything anymore is a little silly, i just think his interests have changed. during the past decade he basically reinvigorated himself. his works with the likes of wes anderson and jim jaramusch have allowed him to explore a different side of acting. i wouldn't be surprised if he felt that he's done with being involved in ghostbuster-like films, unless the script is really really good.
PowderedToast said:to say murray doesn't care about anything anymore is a little silly, i just think his interests have changed. during the past decade he basically reinvigorated himself. his works with the likes of wes anderson and jim jaramusch have allowed him to explore a different side of acting. i wouldn't be surprised if he felt that he's done with being involved in ghostbuster-like films, unless the script is really really good.
i mean if you look back before he appeared in rushmore, his career wasn't in a great place. he could've easily gone down the route aykroyd did, reduced to soley appearing in cameo roles in mediocre comedies. he's got a whole new focus now.
Vyer said:It's a shame that Murray seems to have become one of those 'bitter about being famous' type of guys. I guess there was a falling out between those guys? I don't know.
Being a snarky, bitter, cynical type was always his calling card, but any time I see him /read an interview with him it seems like he's taken it to heart.
I mean, really, how out of touch do you have to be to be surprised there's a whole generation out there that liked Peter Venkman?
This will be the last liquor tour for Aykroyd for awhile. He said much of his time will soon be taken up by Ghostbusters III, which begins shooting next spring.