Support NeoGAF

[Wario64]

 

[DarienA]

EA please change the name of this game... even if it does turn out to be good the name man... the name....

 

[Docpan]

100 percent chance of PHAILURE.

 

[Grizzlyjin]

I don't know what to say. I look at this game and the only word that pops in my head is "meh."

 

[DSN2K]

graphics look very good but from the movies released the gameplay is lacking.

 

[Late Stage Marxist]

Has anyone played it yet? It looks decent enough.

 

[Jacobi]

ugly it is.

 

[SantaC]

they have improved the weapon skins. thats all

 

[DaCocoBrova]

It's all AA'd up. Gobs of that sh!t...

 

[SpoonyBard]

Holding two guns at the same time looks silly, but not bad otherwise...

 

[ToyMachine228]

Is it just me, or does it seem like there are seriously like three guns in the game? That huge assault rifle, pistol, and rocket launcher. That's all I've seen.

 

[Drey1082]

100 percent chance of PHAILURE.

Although this game looks, and most likely plays average at best. I have a bad feeling you will be completely wrong.

 

[Wario64]

But you can hold 2 guns at the same time...innovation!

 

[skip]

respect.

 

[Ramirez]

Hmm,I'll pass

 

[MadOdorMachine]

If it's as good as NightFire, I'll pick it up when it hit's $20.

 

[Sax Russel]

It looks like an excuse to put all the cool Bond movie moments in games. Fort Knox, the GG Bridge fight, the Moonraker facility, etc

 

[Matlock]

Looks awesome (and hopefully sans-escort/hostage saving missions).

 

[Oni Link 666]

The game seriously has no crosshairs? That was one of my complaints about TimeSplitters. They're pretty much forcing you to rely on the auto aim. The crosshairs were more for precise long distance shots.

 

[Deg]

EA please change the name of this game... even if it does turn out to be good the name man... the name....

True

 

[SpoonyBard]

It looks like an excuse to put all the cool Bond movie moments in games. Fort Knox, the GG Bridge fight, the Moonraker facility, etc

Sounds good to me!

 

[Sax Russel]

I'm sure it'll be fun, but I have serious doubts about how they're going tie this in together with a story.

 

[Wario64]

 

[Sho Nuff]

GOLDEN EYE IS AN EYE TAT IS GOLDEN

 

[Kon Tiki]

If I can not shoot a guy up the ass and watch him skwirm, then it is not Goldeneye.

 

[Red Dolphin]

If I can not shoot a guy up the ass and watch him skwirm, then it is not Goldeneye.

Yeah what's up with most shooters these days not having some sort of sign that you've hit enemies or in a particular part of their body. There's too few around. It's not just cool to see and realistic but it lets you know you've actually hit the enemy. It's hard to tell in the heat of a gun fight if they don't even flinch when you shoot them. One of my only complaints about Nightfire. It was a surprisingly good game.

 

[DCX]

I don't know what to say. I look at this game and the only word that pops in my head is "meh."

Me too...i mean it looks good, nothing really to complain about but yeah it just seems very meh.

DCX

 

[TheGreenGiant]

dual wielding!!

 

[=W=]

I don't really care about this game, I just want to thank the thread starter for not calling it Rouge Agent.