Gotham dropped hints in the second season that the Mad Hatter may be the newest DC villain in Gotham City and that is now confirmed. Aussie actor Benedict Samuel (The Walking Dead) has been cast in the series regular role of Jervis Tetch/Mad Hatter for the upcoming third season of Fox’s Batman origin series.
DC villain Jervis Tetch is a talented hypnotist teetering on the edge of madness. He arrives in Gotham with an unwavering desire to find his sister, Alice, a young woman who went missing in the city years ago. It is anyone’s guess just how far down the rabbit hole he’s willing to go in order to find her.
Here is the press release's description for Gotham's Mad Hatter:
Sounds like an interesting twist on the character.
It just feels weird to me to have all of these established villains way before Bruce Wayne becomes Batman. I'm not sure if I like it.
Freeze is the only one ruining it for me atm.(and Dent but they kept him away enough this season)
And Freeze's initial appearance was fine but the reappearances were the problem.
In the comics, Batman's existence creates the villains. But in this show's universe, the villains create the need for Batman's existence.
Personally, I love it because it's a new twist on the mythology.
As far as I know, none of the villain's inherent goals are to try to end the existence of Gotham. It's to harm the people of Gotham. The people of Gotham can be harmed without them being wiped out of the face of the earth. Even Joker rarely seems to want to actually destroy Gotham for good, as opposed to proving some grand point to Batman in particular or atleast just causing some random act of destruction.The problem, in my mind, is this: if these villains are able to exist in Gotham for YEARS without a superhero dealing with them, what is the use of Batman?
The problem, in my mind, is this: if these villains are able to exist in Gotham for YEARS without a superhero dealing with them, what is the use of Batman?
In the comics, Batman's existence creates the villains. But in this show's universe, the villains create the need for Batman's existence.
Personally, I love it because it's a new twist on the mythology.
The problem, in my mind, is this: if these villains are able to exist in Gotham for YEARS without a superhero dealing with them, what is the use of Batman?
In the comics, Batman's existence creates the villains. But in this show's universe, the villains create the need for Batman's existence.
Personally, I love it because it's a new twist on the mythology.
Comic Con Season 3 Teaser
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XokEThBT5eU
Made a thread on it last night but no responses.Thought this was a good place for it.
No new footage until the last 30 seconds. I assume that is a Talon at the end. Some people have been saying Green Hornet but I think that is very unlikely.
Confirmed villains so far from footage and interviews:
Mad Hatter
Court of Owls
Talon
Tweedledee and TweedledumSolomon Grundy
Just saw that season 3 trailer, which showed more old scenes than new scenes. Sadly we see Fish again as well and it seems pretty clear she will be a central character again. Why exactly? Are there more supporters of this character compared to the ones who are against it? After how Season 2 went downhill in the later episodes, I am not holding my breath for season 3 yet.
I've been seeing people bitch about her for basically two years, and I've yet to hear a specific reason why she's bad. It's just the usual "ughfdga she so annooooying" complaint that expresses a dislike, but gives no reason why.
Nobody knows. I hope not. I have had my fill.So no Joker on Season 3?
The show announced back in June that relative newcomer Maggie Geha would be replacing Clare Foley as Ivy Pepper, and now, we have your first look at Geha's Ivy, whose sudden growth spurt will apparently be triggered by a run-in with an escaped monster from Indian Hill.
So the show will come back after a few years from the last season ending?
Not that we are aware of.
A wizard did itSo why a much older Poison Ivy?
Did you read the last part of the description?So why a much older Poison Ivy?
Did you read the last part of the description?
That is kind of jarring.First look at the aged up Poison Ivy
Yep, said the same thing in this thread when she was announced as the new Ivy. Kid mind in an adult body that's all about seducing men as her main ability.No, not creepy AT ALL to have a grown up woman with the mind of a 13 year old.
Nope, not even a little bit pedophilic
Do we even know it'll be her 13 year old self inside this aged body? I'm pretty sure she will have grown up mentally as well.
First look at the Hatter