• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Governement trying to make VCRs and large hard drives illegel

Status
Not open for further replies.

ShadowRed

Banned
Picked this up on another board. Thought it was interesting.







The Betamax VCR died more than 15 years ago, but the Supreme Court decision that made the Betamax and all other VCRs legal lived on. In Sony vs. Universal (known as the Betamax decision) the Court ruled that because VCRs have legitimate uses, the technology is legal—even if some people use it to copy movies. Of course, the movie industry was lucky it lost the case against VCRs, because home video soon became Hollywood's largest source of revenue. And the freedom to use and develop new technology that was protected by the Betamax decision set the stage for the incredible growth in computer technology we've seen in the last few decades.

Hollywood is Trying to Kill Betamax

The Betamax ruling is the only thing that protects your right to own a VCR, tape recorder, CD-burner, DVD-burner, iPod, or TiVo. It's that important. But new legislation that's being pushed through the Senate by lobbyists for the music and movie industries would override the Betamax decision and create a huge liability for any business that makes products which can copy sound or video. This legislation (formerly known as the INDUCE Act) would essentially give Hollywood veto power over a huge range of new technologies. And if they get this power, they'll definitely use it. Even "compromise" drafts from the Copyright Office could make mp3-playing iPods ancient history; the music and movie industries want to force all content to go through their own restricted channels.

Is Congress Insane?

You might think so at first glance. Voters, technology experts, public interest groups, and electronics manufacturers all oppose these efforts to weaken Betamax. So why is it still happening? Because the major record labels and the movie studios-- the same companies that opposed the Betamax ruling-- make huge donations to the re-election campaigns of the Senators who are sponsoring this legislation. {naturally, its author is Republican Orrin Hatch} And most members of Congress assume this is a non-controversial issue, off the radar of most voters. If they can please their donors without a big fuss, they will. It's bad policy, but until we start making noise, it's smart politics.

Why We Need a National Call-In Day

We need to make sure Congress hears from the public. There's been plenty of opposition on the internet to the INDUCE Act and its more recent drafts. But this general dissatisfaction hasn't quite come together into a real demonstration of how strongly people feel about protecting the Betamax decision. At Downhill Battle, we've organized people to send faxes to Congress before and there's been lots of emails flying around, but telephone calls take it to the next level. A big, one-day mobilization to swamp these members of Congress with phone calls could make a huge impact on the debate. If you care about keeping Betamax intact but haven't felt compelled to act before, now's the time to get involved. You can sign up on the top right of this page.

Not Convinced? Don't Take Our Word For It.

If you're ready to get involved, go sign up. If you want some more info on the Betamax ruling and what's happening in Congress, here are some really good quotes from filesharing opponents, Mr. Rogers, and Sony's own Corporate History, all of them in support of the Betamax decision:

things potentially affected by the proposed legislation:

www.corante.com/importanc...t_list.php


info on the movement to block the new legislation:

www.savebetamax.org/
 

Cool

Member
Even if they do illegalize CD-burners, everyone has them already and no one will get caught. What are they going to do? Send the police to my home in rural Pennsylvania with a search warrant to check if I have a CD-Burner or VCR? HAHAHAHAHAHA!
 

Doth Togo

Member
Cool said:
Even if they do illegalize CD-burners, everyone has them already and no one will get caught. What are they going to do? Send the police to my home in rural Pennsylvania with a search warrant to check if I have a CD-Burner or VCR? HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Yes.
 

bishoptl

Banstick Emeritus
leah_canada-flag.jpg
 

xsarien

daedsiluap
:: sigh ::

The Internet is the Great Equalizer, but you also need to mitigate that with a keen sense of when people are mixing raw emotion and personal interpretations into the facts.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2560:

The law, as written, is focused "intentional inducement" of copyright infringement. Now, while that's horrifically vague in its own right, the burden of proof will be on the RIAA, MPAA, and any other party to prove that the device they're calling out was designed for the explicit purpose of encouraging copyright infringment. That's almost impossible.

In other words, your iPods, as designed, are perfectly safe as long as there are no e-mails within Apple that say "Hey, people will pirate their music and play it on our shit, and that's where most of our sales will come from!

Now, I don't know about other audio players, but the iPod came with a friendly little note that said that I shouldn't pirate music. (Heh, yeah, I know...) I think if you ask the average iPod user what they've got stored on the thing, you'll actually find a decent amount of perfectly legal music. iTunes really does kind of encourage you to embrace digitizing your own stuff thanks to how easy it makes it to find your music.

Think about the logic of the bill as interpreted by Corante.com. It fails to completely take into consideration that after the Betamax decision, the movie industry found itself a brand new market: home video. That now accounts for a significant portion of their revenue. This will eventually be the same thing, once these companies decide to relent and embrace digital distribution channels, they'll stop bitching. Will there be pirates? Yeah, there are still guys on street corners selling VHS and DVD dupes. But the majority of the people are more than happy to pay for their widescreen editions of Soul Plane.
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
xsarien said:
:: sigh ::

The Internet is the Great Equalizer, but you also need to mitigate that with a keen sense of when people are mixing raw emotion and personal interpretations into the facts.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2560:

The law, as written, is focused "intentional inducement" of copyright infringement. Now, while that's horrifically vague in its own right, the burden of proof will be on the RIAA, MPAA, and any other party to prove that the device they're calling out was designed for the explicit purpose of encouraging copyright infringment. That's almost impossible.

In other words, your iPods, as designed, are perfectly safe as long as there are no e-mails within Apple that say "Hey, people will pirate their music and play it on our shit, and that's where most of our sales will come from!

Now, I don't know about other audio players, but the iPod came with a friendly little note that said that I shouldn't pirate music. (Heh, yeah, I know...) But I think if you ask the average iPod user what they've got stored on the thing, you'll actually find a decent amount of perfectly legal music. iTunes really does kind of encourage you to embrace digitizing your own stuff thanks to how easy it makes it to find your music.
but..but...but.......Canada!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom