Happosai
Hold onto your panties
Bury my Heart or Red Dragon. Red Dragon reads better than film adaptation was able to do.I’m trying to decide what to read next, I’ve narrowed it down to these six titles. Any thoughts or suggestions?
Bury my Heart or Red Dragon. Red Dragon reads better than film adaptation was able to do.I’m trying to decide what to read next, I’ve narrowed it down to these six titles. Any thoughts or suggestions?
Bury my Heart or Red Dragon. Red Dragon reads better than film adaptation was able to do.
Still a wise choice.decided to go with Mockingbird, as I’ve been told it really is a book that everyone should read.
pauljeremiah You may be able to help me out with this one. I'm searching for a book that I've forgotten the title and author. I can give you what I read based on memory.
Around September 2009 I was in the hospital for about 2-weeks. The staff was handing out books and I read a book on economics and part of a short fiction novel. The economics one I remember; I forget the short novel but here's what I remember:
The title of the book was something along the lines of "So and so??? at the Sit and Bull or Sit and Sit...something like that." The story talks about a small truck stop-inn in a small village in the West. It's set in like the 80's possibly or early 90's. The story tells about a trucker or some kind of guy who was tall with a tough persona but good heart. There was some mean guy who is chasing around a young woman (orphaned I believe) who is Native America. He corners her in an old school bus and tries to assault her but she escapes to the tall cool guy. The tall cool guy is much older but starts protecting her like a daughter.
I never finished the novel because I was discharged from the hospital the same day.
Well, I couldn't get much with that webpage (they wanted Patreon donations to submit a post). Then, one word popped into my head and it was the ugly word "holler." I always attribute the word holler to colloquial English. The "Sit and..." part was all part of a different memory. Regardless, I found the book. I was 23 in 2009 and maybe it was more interesting to my younger self. I'm going to buy it on Kindle books because I no longer live in the U.S. and buying U.S. prints is hard down here.I'm not familiar with that book, but maybe if you use this link you may be able to find it. I hope you do find it as David Mitchell said "an unfinished book is an unfinished love affair"
What's your opinion on audio books? I mean, are you able to form the story in your imagination the same way or does having a narrator do the work get distracting? I'll admit that it can be fun to listen to an audio book of something I've already read...but it's hard for me to get into someone character acting unless they're really good.I tried doing the audiobook version of “Where the Crawdads Sing”. I just can’t do fiction in audiobook form. So I moved onto Kevin Hart’s “The Decision”. Really enjoying it so far. Almost done actually.
For me, I can still visualize it in my imagination, but the narrator keeps going even if you'd like to pause for a second to absorb what's happening. For extremely detailed writing, I just can't absorb it and move on that fast, so I read the actual book.What's your opinion on audio books? I mean, are you able to form the story in your imagination the same way or does having a narrator do the work get distracting? I'll admit that it can be fun to listen to an audio book of something I've already read...but it's hard for me to get into someone character acting unless they're really good.
What's your opinion on audio books? I mean, are you able to form the story in your imagination the same way or does having a narrator do the work get distracting? I'll admit that it can be fun to listen to an audio book of something I've already read...but it's hard for me to get into someone character acting unless they're really good.
I think I could give non-fiction a try. Biographies of war can sometimes get me tired just reading them.My opinion is that non-fiction books work great (for example “Can’t Hurt Me”). Fiction however, is really tough to do. I have a hard time imagining the settings and following along with the dialogue between characters. I need to read it myself and give the characters voices based on my own imagination.
What's your opinion on audio books? I mean, are you able to form the story in your imagination the same way or does having a narrator do the work get distracting? I'll admit that it can be fun to listen to an audio book of something I've already read...but it's hard for me to get into someone character acting unless they're really good.
I imagine it's working for many, though. I have a free subscription to Amazon audible which I haven't used yet. I think I'll give it a try. I'm starting a new job soon and won't have much time after that. Recommendations for a guy who likes horror novels (like Stephen King, Clive Barker, etc), mystery, suspense, and science fiction? Some less common titles.I actually used audiobooks to get me back into reading. I used to just devour books all through my teens and early twenties, and I just stopped reading around the age of twenty-six for reasons that still escape me. And it's only been in the last eighteen months or so that I got properly back into reading. I used audiobooks basically to teach myself to read again by reading along as I listened to them, as weird as a concept as that may sound it did work.
I get that it's a book on satire but any info on where woke-ism comes from? Do they say? Maybe I don't want to know.
That was a quick read.
Satirical piece on woke-ism
Bought it a while back and it had been sitting on my shelf at work.
I bursted out laughing a bunch of times.
As a fat dude the term "people of girth" sent my sides flying. I'm not sure i would recommend to everyone but it was a good time.
It's based mostly on twitter identity people and social justice warriors.I get that it's a book on satire but any info on where woke-ism comes from? Do they say? Maybe I don't want to know.
It's a wise read. I like to read into economics every now and then, too. There are "motivational speakers" who talk finance and will try to charge for classes or courses just to learn the basics in the book you're reading. I seldom ever feel cheated by a good book.Reading The Financial Times Investing by Glen Arnold.
Talks you though the basics and advanced stuff in Stocks and touches on P2P Lending, Taxes and how to avoid them as well as what to watch out for in Financial Statements.
Veey good read.
Norm's movie Dirty Work is great btw. Also the Norm Show had me laughing quite a bit.
I've been trying to make it a point to read more, and was all set to hop into Dune, but my attention span for that kind of material just isn't what it used to be...so I figured I'd go with something a little lighter first. I'm about a third of the way through, and it's pretty funny stuff. It's not quite what I was expecting though, as it's VERY loosely based on reality, but it's still an entertaining read. Norm can spin a yarn, and in a way that only he can.
I read and hated Catcher in the rye, It was more of a hate towards the main character, him being a petulant child and all.Today’s new arrivals, imported these in from the U.K.
You found some winners there! Like the vintage 60's-esque printing on the covers, too.Today’s new arrivals, imported these in from the U.K.
thread is heating up, nice to see so many users reading
-Arcadia- get itt and tell us what yeh been reading
ohh just recieved the picture of dorian gray, from my last haul.You found some winners there! Like the vintage 60's-esque printing on the covers, too.
Just finished reading this. Never got into Oscar Wilde much when I was younger. This is fun to say in the least.
I still can’t believe how dirty they did those books with that god awful movie. WTF were they thinking??? I bet that turned so many people off to the series. Which is a shame because they are epic as fuck.I'm still having some fun with the Dark Tower series. I decided to read the 8th book between the 4th and 5th books, since it takes place that way chronologically.
So now I'm a ways into the 5th, Wolves of Calla.
I'm glad I never watched it. Under the Dome was a really fun book too, but if I had watched that trash TV show, I probably never would have read the book.I still can’t believe how dirty they did those books with that god awful movie. WTF were they thinking??? I bet that turned so many people off to the series. Which is a shame because they are epic as fuck.
Should have been given the Lord of the Rings treatment imo.
It may have worked as a mini-series if they filmed in the late-70's-90's. They sat on the series too long. There are maybe 3 Stephen King film adaptations from the 2000's-onward which I think were okay.I still can’t believe how dirty they did those books with that god awful movie. WTF were they thinking??? I bet that turned so many people off to the series. Which is a shame because they are epic as fuck.
Should have been given the Lord of the Rings treatment imo.
I read The Gunslinger and hated it because it seemed like King was trying to prove how literary he could be, including a multitude of adjectives and adverbs that really slowed that book down. I bought a collection of the first 4 books, but stopped after the first because of the flowery language.I'm still having some fun with the Dark Tower series. I decided to read the 8th book between the 4th and 5th books, since it takes place that way chronologically.
So now I'm a ways into the 5th, Wolves of Calla.
The first book has a few cool moments in it, but it is a horrible first impression. It's a really rough read and I barely got through it. I read the original version, though. From what I understand, he revised it many years later and specifically cited flowery language and improper use of too many adverbsI read The Gunslinger and hated it because it seemed like King was trying to prove how literary he could be, including a multitude of adjectives and adverbs that really slowed that book down. I bought a collection of the first 4 books, but stopped after the first because of the flowery language.
Do the others seem as dense as the first book? Did you notice that at all? I've never felt that way about any other King book I've read.
Cool. I'll have to give others a try. It's funny that his criticism was the same. ThanksThe first book has a few cool moments in it, but it is a horrible first impression. It's a really rough read and I barely got through it. I read the original version, though. From what I understand, he revised it many years later and specifically cited flowery language and improper use of too many adverbs
I don't know which version you tried, but the first one (original) also had to have some inconsistencies corrected since it was written so long ago and King wasn't really all that sure where he was taking certain things and characters. The 2nd book reads completely differently and was a lot of fun. The other books will reference information from the first one in a way that also gives them context, so it wouldn't be that crazy to skip the first one completely.
if we're talking Stephen King out-of-context of before he got his angle, read: Strawberry Spring (NightShift short story). It's one of his first magazine published stories from 1968. It's not King at all but I think some criticism and more exposure in the 70's helped him to get the angle he has. That one story, though...The writing is cheap and he would have never become famous if it was written as an early book.I read The Gunslinger and hated it because it seemed like King was trying to prove how literary he could be, including a multitude of adjectives and adverbs that really slowed that book down. I bought a collection of the first 4 books, but stopped after the first because of the flowery language.
Do the others seem as dense as the first book? Did you notice that at all? I've never felt that way about any other King book I've read.
I read Jurassic Park and liked it from what I remember. I won Timeline in an internet contest back around 2000 along with the PC game. The book was pretty good, but the game was not.Any Crichton fans out there? Which books were your favorites. These were my 4 favorites.
Jurassic Park the book is intense. It had to be partially rewritten for the screenplay due to how violent the book can get. All of the deaths in the book are twice as violent and the movie would have gotten an R-rating if it had been written remotely like Crichton's original.I read Jurassic Park and liked it from what I remember. I won Timeline in an internet contest back around 2000 along with the PC game. The book was pretty good, but the game was not.
I also heard the audiobook of The Andromeda Strain. It was not very good. The narrator wasn't very good, which was part of it, but the story is also dated compared to a lot of it's contemporaries.
I need to give Jurassic Park another try, or maybe it's sequel.