• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Houston = Fatville, USA (for the 4th time in 5 years!)

Status
Not open for further replies.

AirBrian

Member

tedtropy

$50/hour, but no kissing on the lips and colors must be pre-separated
That's right bitches, we're back on top...and crushing you with our enormous greasy asses!
 
AirBrian said:
The Annual FATTEST CITIES
1. Houston
2. Philadelphia
3. Detroit
4. Memphis
5. Chicago
6. Dallas
7. New Orleans
8. New York
9. Las Vegas
10. San Antonio

And the FITTEST CITIES
1. Seattle
2. Honolulu
3. Colorado Springs
4. San Francisco
5. Denver
6. Portland, Ore.
7. Sacramento
8. Tucson
9. San Diego
10. Albuquerque

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-01-06-fittest-cities_x.htm?csp=34

Here's how they determined the results:

http://www.mensfitness.com/rankings/201

Damn, I just moved from there. The absence of my perfect physique must have hurt their average.
 

olimario

Banned
Tazznum1 said:
Everything really is bigger in Texas.
Yes it is... EVERYthing.
smiley02.gif
 

DaCocoBrova

Finally bought a new PSP, but then pushed the demon onto someone else. Jesus.
WTF??!

Here in DC, there are nothing but fat women everywhere. I find it hard to imagine there's an even 'fatter' City than this one.
 

AirBrian

Member
Tazznum1 said:
Everything really is bigger in Texas.
Including highways:
Texas Thinking Big on Transportation

HOUSTON — Do not mistake the Trans-Texas Corridor for a mere superhighway.

As imagined by Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the $175-billion project will be a transportation behemoth of mind-boggling proportions: 4,000 miles of mostly toll lanes perhaps a quarter-mile wide, capable of carrying cars, trucks, and high-speed freight and commuter trains.

There would be room underground for oil, water, electric and gas pipelines, and the whole works would be built largely with private money.

"It's a blueprint for our transportation and population needs for the next 50 years," Texas Department of Transportation spokeswoman Gaby Garcia said. "It's the wave of the future to plan for different modes [of transport] in one corridor."

Opponents call the ambitious scheme ill-conceived and absurdly expensive.

"It's so grandiose and outlandish that people at first didn't think it would happen," said David Stall, who founded a group called Corridor Watch to keep tabs on the project. "But they're railroading it through — and most Texans don't even know what it is."

Perry introduced what he called a "visionary transportation plan" during his 2002 reelection campaign, and continued to push for it after he was sworn in. In 2003, he signed a transportation bill that authorized construction of the mammoth roadway.

The corridor is meant to ease congestion on existing interstates by diverting long-distance and regional traffic onto mega-highways, which would largely skirt urban areas. Trucks carrying hazardous materials could bypass populated cities by traveling on the new system.

"We can slowly try to address traffic in cities with very expensive Band-Aids, which means making four lanes into six or eight," said state Rep. Mike Krusee, who wrote legislation to make the corridor possible. "But wouldn't it be cheaper to build basically a parallel corridor, where land is cheaper and there's room to expand?"

Backers say the project is badly needed in Texas because of a rapidly growing population and increased traffic from a post-NAFTA flow of goods to and from Mexico.

The linchpin of the plan is its financing: Though the state would own the right of way to the roads, private contractors would pay to build them. In return, the contractors could charge concessions — such as tolls — for as long as 50 years. Similar projects in other countries have been financed this way, Krusee said, and it is how the Texas Department of Transportation intends to do it.

"Our problems are urgent in Texas, but we don't have the money to do this sort of thing," said Krusee, who is chairman of the state House Transportation Committee. "By putting it up for bid from private companies, it's a way for growth to pay for itself."

In mid-December, the state Department of Transportation agreed to let a private consortium led by Spanish toll-road operator Cintra build the first section of the corridor — a $6-billion, 316-mile turnpike from Dallas to San Antonio.

As part of the deal, the group will add $1.2 billion more for other state transportation projects, Garcia said. In return, the consortium will be allowed to charge tolls on the road at rates approved by the state.

The Dallas-San Antonio toll road will be part of an 800-mile corridor that will run parallel to Interstate 35 from Oklahoma to Mexico. Other potential corridors could run east-west from the Texas Gulf Coast to El Paso and north-south from the Panhandle to Laredo.

Stall is skeptical of the Cintra deal, reserving judgment until the contract becomes public, assuming it ever does.

"They say no state dollars will go into the corridors, and that may be semantically true. But someone who is investing billions of dollars expects to get their money back and more, and ultimately Texans will pay for it through tolls and other concessions," Stall said.

The Trans-Texas Corridor is a revenue-raising plan masquerading as transportation development, Stall said. The state can acquire private land for the roads through the power of eminent domain, then sell or lease the property for any purpose — whether it's for the highway, a gas station, restaurant or a billboard.

"The state is using its powers to create a monopoly [along the corridor] for the state and concessionaires," Stall said.

Texas economist Ray Perryman has estimated that the project could generate about $135 billion for the state over 50 years.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=sto...4/ts_latimes/texasthinkingbigontransportation

o_O
 

Macam

Banned
Seattle? Coffee, music, and rain. Sounds a bit like heaven to me.

Wasn't Houston edged out last year by Detroit? If I'm not mistaken, the first or second year Houston was declared the fattest city, I believe we were also the smoggiest that same year. I still have yet to comprehend why this state just can't do mass transit, as they do in most every other region with booming populations. There's perpetual construction in every city in this state, all involving more freeway lanes at a time when people keep buying bigger and bigger cars, when a simple train or subway system would help alleviate things tremendously. Houston, for all its size, had a small scale railway system approved last year or so, but it was to cover only 20 miles or so, cost an arm and a leg, and take forever to build. Austin, just this year, sneakily passed a bare minimum rail system that only makes 9 stops, presumably to alleviate northbound traffic to Dell.

This is a terribly stupid state, much as I love Austin.
 

SSGMUN10000

Connoisseur Of Tedium
Desperado said:
I'm guessing this doesn't include suburbs.


Dont try to be excluded because it does include suburbs..............................................I kid I really dont know. I know im doing my part to contribute to the fatness.
 

fennec fox

ferrets ferrets ferrets ferrets FERRETS!!!
Why is Houston #1? Isn't it hot as blazes down there? Don't people sweat?

(I'm from Philadelphia and I can certainly understand why it's #2 -- all the good local food is terrible for you.)
 
Wow, Chicago I can understand, cause the food is great, and it doesn't cost much... Houston is no surprise from the stories my cousins would tell, supplied with pictures. :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom