TheGodfather07
Member
What exactly do think is happening?
Why ask questions you already know the answer to? Don't play dumb.
What exactly do think is happening?
This type of in-depth conversation has to be had post-showcase, not during one. They will probably hold a post-showcase couch talk for him to clear the air completely, either same day or next day. Right now, all we have are rumors and vague wording from an interview with a higher up.Phil seems to have been sidelined. Maybe today at the Direct?
The analysts I spoke to agree that a strategy of curated, timed releases of former-exclusives on Nintendo and PlayStation consoles makes a lot of sense for Xbox…
So exactly what was suggested on the Satya post. Why are people so desperate to turn this into MS getING out of hardware and becoming publisher only?
Decent margins for Microsoft would eliminate one of the primary drivers of getting their hardware in the first place and put you in a price range where you are in competition with tens of not hundreds of other hardware manufacturers. At that point you'd be better off trying to go the Steam Machine route.
It's honestly why I think they want to get out of the console hardware business. Remember they were selling the S/X at $100-200 loss per unit sold not to mention R&D. They've given the console hardware business 20+ years and their biggest success was marred by massive hardware failures that cost them over a billion to remedy. They followed that up with hardware that only managed 68% of the sales and their current hardware probably isn't going to equal that.
I think the complication to a plan like this would be the risk of negatively impacting the Windows side of the business. Xbox basically becoming a Windows gaming PC minus the bullshit of dealing with Windows could potentially crater the Microsoft based desktop and laptop markets. They make a ton of money licensing the OS to manufacturers.That’s why I said they go super high, customizable, and powerful.
It differentiates their product more, makes it a lot more niche, but retains profitability
They will be perfectly OK selling far less consoles than trying to race to the bottom on cost. Because software will be the major driver of profits, not hardware, they won’t leave hardware cold turkey
That’s why I said they go super high, customizable, and powerful.
It differentiates their product more, makes it a lot more niche, but retains profitability
They will be perfectly OK selling far less consoles than trying to race to the bottom on cost. Because software will be the major driver of profits, not hardware, they won’t leave hardware cold turkey
I think the complication to a plan like this would be the risk of negatively impacting the Windows side of the business. Xbox basically becoming a Windows gaming PC minus the bullshit of dealing with Windows could potentially crater the Microsoft based desktop and laptop markets. They make a ton of money licensing the OS to manufacturers.
Just going to be interesting if Sony allow them on their platform. I don't think games like hi fi rush will need an xbox login, but surely ms will be pushing for one in anything multiplayer relayed, which I think Sony will be against.
That’s why I said they go super high, customizable, and powerful.
It differentiates their product more, makes it a lot more niche, but retains profitability
It differentiates itself by entering a market crowded with tons of other manufacturers?
But think about it ... If they start seeking profit for each console unit sold (they'll have to at that point if the total userbase has shrunk to less than 25 million), their console will end up at $800 MSRP.It is if they get decent margins on the hardware. That’s why I said it would be sold at a premium. It won’t be a big driver of their business compared to third party, but I think they’ll want to keep their hardest core fans still engaged with their entire ecosystem
The end goal is to eventually phase out hardware entirely and go to the cloud, but in the here and now they need to remain relevant
What's funny to me about all this, is that I didn't only see all this coming years ago, I just find it strange how some people still haven't noticed the patterns.Here's what Xbox should do, and it's quite simple.
Drop the exclusivity bullshit. You just bought a $70B company and you are contractually obligated to bring it to Playstation AND Switch now, for a VERY long time. Why allow Activision, a series that is wildly popular, to be multiplatform, but let you new IPs like Hi-Fi-Rush be sent out to die just because it's on a very small userbase relative to what it could be released on? Makes no fucking sense. Your console is getting outsold in Europe massively (they have like what, 5% marketshare if that???).
1. Xbox "hardware" becomes more specialized and niche and comes in two form factors that have access to the full suite of Windows and an Xbox UI that are GamePass launchers as well.
Generations now no longer really exist for Microsoft hardware. It's just new smaller iterations available more frequently. The chassis may eventually need to be upgraded, but they will be pretty infrequent.
- A "Steam Deck" style Series S type console that is NOT obligated to play every game, but can play what will run on it across the entire PC universe. Can either be handheld alone or docked. Sold at a premium.
- A "Gaming PC" style Series X that is both more expensive than any console we've seen before ($800-1000+), but that has upgradeable components (GPUs, etc).
2. ALL Xbox Studios titles released on Playstation/Switch where possible.
3. Microsoft gets to "Gatekeep" their GamePass service to their own console (begrudgingly, since I don't think Sony will allow this). So they still get some sort of exclusivity type arrangement that entices people to buy their hardware.
But yeah, it's not sustainable to keep releasing all these niche Bethesda games (other than Starfield/Elderscrolls) and titles from Ninja Theory, Obsidian, etc. as exclusives. They are basically being sent out to die and the consumer isn't reacting to this by buying Xboxes, they are reacting to it by NOT buying Xbox or their games at all.
That's pure fanboyism right there. Seems like just the idea is causing certain brains to malfunction.I don't understand why some people are so desperate to have "xbox" branded hardware? People are proposing $800 hardware? DenchDeckard mentioned he'd take hardware that Microsoft are making a couple of hundred dollars of profit on?
Please make it make sense. At that point just build or buy a HTPC.
When Phil would say something that would be going agains what Nadella has been saying, he would be paying a visit to Nadella's office, you can be shure of that....Come on Phil say something.
This is gonna be interesting to watch. If he does, some will take what Phil says as gospel...and the cycle will continue.When Phil would say something that would be going agains what Nadella has been saying, he would be paying a visit to Nadella's office, you can be shure of that....
We know from the FTC case that he wanted everything exclusive (as in, not on Playstation) , COD exclusive as soon as the marketing deal with Sony ended and that he was really pissed off that he couldn't take Minecraft from Playstation and now Nadella decides to go multiplatform (or start a process of going multiplatform in stages).This is gonna be interesting to watch. If he does, some will take what Phil says as gospel...and the cycle will continue.
One of these days all Xbox/MS execs will be on the same page, at the same time, as far as messaging
I still believe that they wanted COD as an exclusive to use as leverage when they would try and put GamePass on Playstation.We know from the FTC case that he wanted everything exclusive (as in, not on Playstation) , COD exclusive as soon as the marketing deal with Sony ended and that he was really pissed off that he couldn't take Minecraft from Playstation and now Nadella decides to go multiplatform (or start a process of going multiplatform in stages).
Hard times for Phil ahead, he'll probably quit silently.
GP on Playstation would be technically weird, aside from streaming. MS couldn't use the Xbox versions of the games because of the different OS and Sony proprietary formats, so it would be Sony to give access to their versions on their servers to be downloaded by players as MS GP game and they would obviously charge massively MS for that. Then there is the account linking, save data encryption, etc. With GP being cheap and MS having to pay publishers too, they would just lose money.I still believe that they wanted COD as an exclusive to use as leverage when they would try and put GamePass on Playstation.
It's a double-edged sword though.
Well, yeah, but that's part of why buying ABK would be much cheaper and beneficial for MS.GP on Playstation would be technically weird, aside from streaming. MS couldn't use the Xbox versions of the games because of the different OS and Sony proprietary formats, so it would be Sony to give access to their versions on their servers to be downloaded by players as MS GP game and they would obviously charge massively MS for that. Then there is the account linking, save data encryption, etc. With GP being cheap and MS having to pay publishers too, they would just lose money.
I don't think MS really intended to have GP on Playstation, they just tried so they could say "Sony is mean to us".
STAGE 5: CAPITULATION TO IRRELEVANCE OR DEATH
The longer a company remains in Stage 4, repeatedly grasping for silver bullets, the more likely it will spiral downward. In Stage 5, accumulated setbacks and expensive false starts erode financial strength and individual spirit to such an extent that leaders abandon all hope of building a great future. In some cases the company's leader just sells out; in other cases the institution atrophies into utter insignificance; and in the most extreme cases the enterprise simply dies outright.
It’s “a strategy of curated, timed releases of former-exclusives”When things don't go your teams way pretend that was the plan all along.
People already havePhase two of all this by the way is that the narrative will shift to Sony and Nintendo being "anti-consumer" for maintaining their platform exclusives.
Don't fall for it.
Sony has no reason not to as long as MS makes a concession on the XBL requirement
Most GaaS titles are service agnostic, like Fortnite, so MS should forget about caring too deeply about XBL
I'm not so sure.Fortnite uses an Epic account though right. Maybe Sony will be open to an Xbox account on Gaas games/ Multi if Xbox does the same as these other accounts. Just sign into Xbox on booting automatically. I could see Sony allowing that, if they are allowing others.
I'm not so sure.
"GP now twice as big as PS+" isn't good PR for Sony, I think.
Contrary to Epic and EA, Xbox is still very much a direct competitor, even though they're crashing, right now.I wonder how petty it comes across if they dont allow it. When you have games like Apex (EA login) Fortnite (Epic Account) Ubisoft games even SOny games on PC needing account logins. In theory you are just letting your customer base down if you dont allow an xbox game like Sea Of Thieves on the platform because it has an xbox account login.
Do you think it would be shit for Sony to not allow an Xbox game on PS5 that required an xbox account, if it's multiplayer and Gaas and using Microsoft servers?
Copium?IGN maybe should have asked analytics here. They already know that Microsoft is already preparing PlayStation ports of Hellblade 2 and Indiana Jones
It's almost like Microsoft was already and will be releasing their games on other consoles. Minecraft Legends, Minecraft Dungeons, TESO, Fallout 76, Call of Duty are and will be on PlayStation and Nintendo. I expect Odyssey (Blizzard survival game) and Kestrel (ZOS online game) to be on PlayStation day one.
But that's about it. People who thinks Microsoft will start porting all their first-party games on PlayStation are just delusional.
Also. Analysts are saying that Game Pass 33,3 million subscribers? Not bad for service that is "not growing"
I wonder how petty it comes across if they dont allow it. When you have games like Apex (EA login) Fortnite (Epic Account) Ubisoft games even SOny games on PC needing account logins. In theory you are just letting your customer base down if you dont allow an xbox game like Sea Of Thieves on the platform because it has an xbox account login.
Do you think it would be shit for Sony to not allow an Xbox game on PS5 that required an xbox account, if it's multiplayer and Gaas and using Microsoft servers?
One thing is shure...this is a boss over boss situation, and Phil has to do what Nadella tells him to do otherwise Phil will have a big problem if he would bring another message than Naddella...This is gonna be interesting to watch. If he does, some will take what Phil says as gospel...and the cycle will continue.
One of these days all Xbox/MS execs will be on the same page, at the same time, as far as messaging
People are overthinking this. They already allow you to link your xbox account on Minecraft for crossplay. It being optional and not a requirement is the only caveat.