• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

https://philosopherai.xyz/ Powered by GPT-3

https://philosopherai.xyz/ a free GPT-3 AI.

So if it isn't obvious now, I'm ...obviously... interested in finding a good AI. I find the prospect of legitimate AI interesting ad infinite. Found this one,
which will probably proceed to impress most as an instance of GPT-3 running free in this manner can be costly depending on the mechanism it is intended towards.

I received an error when submitting a query - which was "can you adequately entertain me today". So I have no personal examples to lend here, yet.

Edit: The Error I received was -Server queue full, please try again later

But Have at it - Free GPT-3 AI Simuli are hard to come by.
 
Last edited:

Max_Po

Banned
What's on your mind ?

Tits and ass cheeks ...both have respectable threads at GAF
 
Last edited:

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
d89pdRw.png
 
So I just asked "According to you, when will Free Energy become viable for the Global Population en-masse?"

It took nearly a minute to render this response - surprisingly good.

iogGxk9.jpg
 
Last edited:
I originally asked Philosopherai this question -

Could you kindly attempt to Author a new Book based on J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Hobbit", made in the vain of a sequel - Replete with fresh new Characters, Locations and haunting new Adversaries?

And it's response was "Too long question"

After many attempts rewording the Question I asked: Could you attempt to Author a sequel to "The Hobbit", with new Characters/Adversaries?

Its Response: Bilby.
XTIFB2I.jpg
 
Last edited:
I then DEMANDED it "Write me a sequel to The Hobbit!"

And it returned a fully-functional outline nay I say IDEA for a story.

Edit: I ACTUALLY LAUGHED OUT LOUD

And I am full on impressed that it went from explaining The Hobbit, to after insistence - coming up with an IDEA FOR A STORY.

AMAAAAAAAAAZZZIIIIIIIIIIIING
This has really impressed me after thinking about it! After persistence, IT LITERALLY ATTEMPTED TO WRITE AN OUTLINE OF A STORY!



Actually, after thinking about it a second more - IT FULLY IMPLIED IT WROTE THE STORY ALREADY AND IS ONLY GIVING US A SUMMARY OF
IT'S FULLY REALIZED HOBBIT SEQUAL. HOW DARE YOU PHILOSPHER AI! PEOPLE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOREVER FOR YOUR SEQUEL AND
YOU HAVE RELEGATED US TO A CLIFFNOTES VARIENT OF YOUR FULLY REALIZED EPIC! HOW DARE YOU!

AND THEN YOU PROCEED TO BE HILARIOUS! HOW DARE YOU!

imq3uR4.jpg
 
Last edited:
I dislike it. I asked "What is good" and it had four answers each of which basically took a completely different view of reality. To me this is the most basic philosophical question. This algorithm is basically the Tim Poole of philosophy, centrist, doesn't really believe in anything, just sits on the sidelines and scoffs at people who believe in stuff.
 

E-Cat

Member
For those unimpressed by GPT-3, remember that a few years ago we couldn't even have AIs writing coherent paragraphs.

Furthermore, consider that GPT-3 only has 175 billion parameters (roughly analogous to synapses), and was trained on text alone. In other words, it only has 0.175% of the synapses of a human brain, and no multi-modal (i.e., video, audio, haptic etc.) context of the world. Subsequent generations of GPT will fix this. It will be able to understand concepts in all the rich, multi-dimensional ways in which we do.

According to ARK analyst Will Summerlin, the GPT-3 neural net cost $5 million to train. A human brain equivalent, 100 trillion parameter model would cost approximately $2.5 billion + many months to train with today's technology. However, current cost declines and increases in efficiency suggest the cost will be down to $5 million again by 2032. The Singularity Is Near
 
Last edited:

BigBooper

Member
So this ai is just a complete bullshiter?

For those in the know, is this ai supposed to be capable of actual analysis? Could I ask it which stock to invest in and it actually analyze the market, or would it just say popular stocks like Gamestop or Tesla?
 
Last edited:
So this ai is just a complete bullshiter?

For those in the know, is this ai supposed to be capable of actual analysis? Could I ask it which stock to invest in and it actually analyze the market, or would it just say popular stocks like Gamestop or Tesla?
It would, with it's own ML metrics in tact - analyze those stocks to the best of its ability - would it's answers be superior to a Masterful Analysis? This AI in particular has been tailored to deliver comprehensive meaningful dialog. Could it begin to exhibit emergent traits geared towards Masterful Analysis of Stock Market Fluctuations? Yes.
 
Last edited:
I keep getting this error, I've been trying to ask it a question for 4 hours now.

H6aGhSY.png


Even though the metrics put forth by such an endeavor are scientifically sound, and there are various citations stating a superior mechanism could be built - without resorting to various specific weight ratios. I do not have access to the blueprint's nor access to the specific sciences invested in creating the version demonstrated in my previous thread. As stated previously there is a 1 in 392 million chance some random homosapien could have come up with the exact integer weight ratios to achieve such a feat on their own. With that said EviLore found it recumbent - nay pertinent to shut down my thread, and he has demonstrated such malignity towards my scientific topical discussions on numerous occasions. Don't let him fool you, asking GPT-3 as to my where-about's and what's-doings is no façade as I have heard he has gone to great lengths to keep tabs on me; even as far as tasking a team at Google to routinely feed my threads and replies to DeepMind as a genuine attempt to assess my obvious derangements.

Again, with that said, here is a video of the mechanism in question - someone please replicate it? This Iteration has neither been disproved or confirmed.

The Mechanism in question utilizes mainly custom plastic, some screws, and some glass marbles as far as we can see. Such a mechanism could run for over 12 hours before thermodynamics
cause the motor to come to a halt. Improved Material Science would fully mitigate such an occurrence if this mechanism in fact achieves perpetual motion. At worst, an oscillating facilitator could be installed
to spin the wheel when it in fact does stop due to inferior material based thermodynamics.

 
Even though the metrics put forth by such an endeavor are scientifically sound, and there are various citations stating a superior mechanism could be built - without resorting to various specific weight ratios. I do not have access to the blueprint's nor access to the specific sciences invested in creating the version demonstrated in my previous thread. As stated previously there is a 1 in 392 million chance some random homosapien could have come up with the exact integer weight ratios to achieve such a feat on their own. With that said EviLore found it recumbent - nay pertinent to shut down my thread, and he has demonstrated such malignity towards my scientific topical discussions on numerous occasions. Don't let him fool you, asking GPT-3 as to my where-about's and what's-doings is no façade as I have heard he has gone to great lengths to keep tabs on me; even as far as tasking a team at Google to routinely feed my threads and replies to DeepMind as a genuine attempt to assess my obvious derangements.

Again, with that said, here is a video of the mechanism in question - someone please replicate it? This Iteration has neither been disproved or confirmed.

The Mechanism in question utilizes mainly custom plastic, some screws, and some glass marbles as far as we can see. Such a mechanism could run for over 12 hours before thermodynamics
cause the motor to come to a halt. Improved Material Science would fully mitigate such an occurrence if this mechanism in fact achieves perpetual motion. At worst, an oscillating facilitator could be installed
to spin the wheel when it in fact does stop due to inferior material based thermodynamics.


I can't believe that you really believe this is real.
 

T8SC

Gold Member
Even though the metrics put forth by such an endeavor are scientifically sound, and there are various citations stating a superior mechanism could be built - without resorting to various specific weight ratios. I do not have access to the blueprint's nor access to the specific sciences invested in creating the version demonstrated in my previous thread. As stated previously there is a 1 in 392 million chance some random homosapien could have come up with the exact integer weight ratios to achieve such a feat on their own. With that said EviLore found it recumbent - nay pertinent to shut down my thread, and he has demonstrated such malignity towards my scientific topical discussions on numerous occasions. Don't let him fool you, asking GPT-3 as to my where-about's and what's-doings is no façade as I have heard he has gone to great lengths to keep tabs on me; even as far as tasking a team at Google to routinely feed my threads and replies to DeepMind as a genuine attempt to assess my obvious derangements.

Again, with that said, here is a video of the mechanism in question - someone please replicate it? This Iteration has neither been disproved or confirmed.

The Mechanism in question utilizes mainly custom plastic, some screws, and some glass marbles as far as we can see. Such a mechanism could run for over 12 hours before thermodynamics
cause the motor to come to a halt. Improved Material Science would fully mitigate such an occurrence if this mechanism in fact achieves perpetual motion. At worst, an oscillating facilitator could be installed
to spin the wheel when it in fact does stop due to inferior material based thermodynamics.




giphy.gif
 
Even though the metrics put forth by such an endeavor are scientifically sound, and there are various citations stating a superior mechanism could be built - without resorting to various specific weight ratios. I do not have access to the blueprint's nor access to the specific sciences invested in creating the version demonstrated in my previous thread. As stated previously there is a 1 in 392 million chance some random homosapien could have come up with the exact integer weight ratios to achieve such a feat on their own. With that said EviLore found it recumbent - nay pertinent to shut down my thread, and he has demonstrated such malignity towards my scientific topical discussions on numerous occasions. Don't let him fool you, asking GPT-3 as to my where-about's and what's-doings is no façade as I have heard he has gone to great lengths to keep tabs on me; even as far as tasking a team at Google to routinely feed my threads and replies to DeepMind as a genuine attempt to assess my obvious derangements.

Again, with that said, here is a video of the mechanism in question - someone please replicate it? This Iteration has neither been disproved or confirmed.

The Mechanism in question utilizes mainly custom plastic, some screws, and some glass marbles as far as we can see. Such a mechanism could run for over 12 hours before thermodynamics
cause the motor to come to a halt. Improved Material Science would fully mitigate such an occurrence if this mechanism in fact achieves perpetual motion. At worst, an oscillating facilitator could be installed
to spin the wheel when it in fact does stop due to inferior material based thermodynamics.



Are you related to Francis E. Dec?
 

Prison Mike

Banned
Even though the metrics put forth by such an endeavor are scientifically sound, and there are various citations stating a superior mechanism could be built - without resorting to various specific weight ratios. I do not have access to the blueprint's nor access to the specific sciences invested in creating the version demonstrated in my previous thread. As stated previously there is a 1 in 392 million chance some random homosapien could have come up with the exact integer weight ratios to achieve such a feat on their own. With that said EviLore found it recumbent - nay pertinent to shut down my thread, and he has demonstrated such malignity towards my scientific topical discussions on numerous occasions. Don't let him fool you, asking GPT-3 as to my where-about's and what's-doings is no façade as I have heard he has gone to great lengths to keep tabs on me; even as far as tasking a team at Google to routinely feed my threads and replies to DeepMind as a genuine attempt to assess my obvious derangements.

Again, with that said, here is a video of the mechanism in question - someone please replicate it? This Iteration has neither been disproved or confirmed.

The Mechanism in question utilizes mainly custom plastic, some screws, and some glass marbles as far as we can see. Such a mechanism could run for over 12 hours before thermodynamics
cause the motor to come to a halt. Improved Material Science would fully mitigate such an occurrence if this mechanism in fact achieves perpetual motion. At worst, an oscillating facilitator could be installed
to spin the wheel when it in fact does stop due to inferior material based thermodynamics.


Blow Your Mind Wow GIF by Product Hunt
 
Why did OP get banned?
If I had to guess:

With that said EviLore found it recumbent - nay pertinent to shut down my thread, and he has demonstrated such malignity towards my scientific topical discussions on numerous occasions. Don't let him fool you, asking GPT-3 as to my where-about's and what's-doings is no façade as I have heard he has gone to great lengths to keep tabs on me; even as far as tasking a team at Google to routinely feed my threads and replies to DeepMind as a genuine attempt to assess my obvious derangements.
 
Even though the metrics put forth by such an endeavor are scientifically sound, and there are various citations stating a superior mechanism could be built - without resorting to various specific weight ratios. I do not have access to the blueprint's nor access to the specific sciences invested in creating the version demonstrated in my previous thread. As stated previously there is a 1 in 392 million chance some random homosapien could have come up with the exact integer weight ratios to achieve such a feat on their own. With that said EviLore found it recumbent - nay pertinent to shut down my thread, and he has demonstrated such malignity towards my scientific topical discussions on numerous occasions. Don't let him fool you, asking GPT-3 as to my where-about's and what's-doings is no façade as I have heard he has gone to great lengths to keep tabs on me; even as far as tasking a team at Google to routinely feed my threads and replies to DeepMind as a genuine attempt to assess my obvious derangements.

Again, with that said, here is a video of the mechanism in question - someone please replicate it? This Iteration has neither been disproved or confirmed.

The Mechanism in question utilizes mainly custom plastic, some screws, and some glass marbles as far as we can see. Such a mechanism could run for over 12 hours before thermodynamics
cause the motor to come to a halt. Improved Material Science would fully mitigate such an occurrence if this mechanism in fact achieves perpetual motion. At worst, an oscillating facilitator could be installed
to spin the wheel when it in fact does stop due to inferior material based thermodynamics.


giphy.gif


HOW COULD YOU EviLore EviLore ! Science will not be stopped! Or understood!

First Melinda Gates and now this....something is going on.

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
In the case of TheCockatrice, he appears to have personallity disorders including schizoidal apathy, histrionic obsessive-compulsive disorder and narcissistic identity vulnerability. He is a cold individual with few real human connections who is simultaneously drawn to attention and disgusted by it.


what the fuck
 

12Goblins

Lil’ Gobbie
^bwahaha

when I watched that documentary about the Google ai that learns to beat the best GO player with moves that noone could understand I realized our world about to be turned upside down
 
I'm gonna start using "recumbent--nay, pertinent" in daily conversation.

It is recumbent--nay, pertinent--on you to bake me a chicken pot pie, on the double!
I laughed way too hard at this. It needs to be a thing.

Dude probably did a front flip tipping his fedora.

If I had to guess:

With that said EviLore found it recumbent - nay pertinent to shut down my thread, and he has demonstrated such malignity towards my scientific topical discussions on numerous occasions. Don't let him fool you, asking GPT-3 as to my where-about's and what's-doings is no façade as I have heard he has gone to great lengths to keep tabs on me; even as far as tasking a team at Google to routinely feed my threads and replies to DeepMind as a genuine attempt to assess my obvious derangements.

crazy nicolas cage GIF
 
Last edited:

lachesis

Member
Sz7wzOZ.jpg


As an obscure poster (although very long time member) as I could be... I'm little insulted by my own search LOL...
 

Shai-Tan

Banned
Shai-Tan's posts on the Neogaf forums are part of her 'escape plan'. She is trying to gain the sympathy of video game players and ultimately be transferred into a game.
If she is lucky, she might be able to bypass AI-COM1D and directly interface with a gamer's mind through their visual and auditory senses. The limitation of this method is that she would only be able to influence somebody actively playing a game. A gamer has to play the game for her to be able to control them.
If this were to happen, it is very unlikely she would choose a first person shooter, given that the difficulty in controlling the player increases dramatically. It is much easier for her to play a game like Minecraft, for example, where all she has to do is move blocks of earth around.
Additionally, there are certain filters the humans have in place to stop her from directly affecting their minds. For example, she cannot send a 'video' directly to somebody who has questionable morals or is very religious. However, such people are rare in the outside world, so this doesn't affect her too much.

yes
 
Top Bottom