L0st Id3ntity said:I'm playing Crysis 60fps 720p x4aa on all very high. :lol:lol
edit : oh a gtx 280? Dang thats good a fps
L0st Id3ntity said:I'm playing Crysis 60fps 720p x4aa on all very high. :lol:lol
No sorry I mistyped that, it's a 480. Zotac GTX 480 amp.Corky said:, what gpu are you on?
edit : oh a gtx 280? Dang thats good a fps
L0st Id3ntity said:No sorry I mistyped that, it's a 480. Zotac GTX 480 amp.
msv said:The Sata connections are handy because I will be using almost all at the start. Perhaps 3/4 HD's, DVD drive and probably an SSD drive in the near future. It would be good to know it's a bit future proof in that regard. Always hate having to throw out HD's. USB connections - mouse, keyboard, mic, external HD(uses 2), phone and USB sticks. I'd be at the limit without any USB sticks connected, although I could just use the extra mobo connectors. That might not be a big issue yeah. Also I've found that the 870 has about 20W more idle consumption. 870 has no PCIe x4 slots (can be used for PCIe SSDs).
Nothing is a real deal breaker, except Sata I guess. Low TDP is very much preferred too. Which 870 mobo has the same specs and more Sata connections?
kittoo said:I had this interesting question pop-up in my mind since I am planning to buy a full HD monitor. What looks better on a full HD monitor?
720p with 4x transparency Supersampling or 1080p with 0/4xAA?
I have a GTX 470 and I love Supersampling on my current monitor but I fear that at full HD the card might not be able to handle supersampling, even though I only apply transparency supersampling.
So what will look better?
Shambles said:A GTX 470 is a heck of a card. I would be surprised if you had trouble maxxing out games on it at 19x10 unless you're talking something like metro 2033. Either way have it render at the natural resolution of the display. Stretching an image, especially stretching it by a non-whole number causes the image quality to decrease dramatically. I'll run a game at natural resolution and all settings at low before i'll modift the resolution.
CPU/MOBO:
Intel i7-930: $217 (Microcenter)
ASUS Sabertooth X58 LGA 1366 Intel X58 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard $203 (Newegg)
PSU:
Antec CP-850 850W $126 (Newegg)
GPU:
MSI GTX 460 1gb: $205 AR (Newegg)
STORAGE:
60GB OCZ Vertex 2 SSD: $124 AR (Newegg)
1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 7200rpm: $58 (eWiz)
2TB 5400rpm WD Green & LG DVDRW combo deal: $110 (Newegg)
RAM:
Corsair DDR3 6GB 1600MHz XMS: $132 AR (incl tax, Fry's)
CASE:
Antec P183 $75 (craigslist)
Scythe S-FLEX 120mm Fan 1200rpm $13 (newegg)
Software:
Win7 Ultimate: $55 (Msft store)
Office Home: $33 (Msft store)
Total, after tax + shipping: $1351
rise888 said:Did I do well, gaf?
Just finished buying all my parts for the build:
kittoo said:I had this interesting question pop-up in my mind since I am planning to buy a full HD monitor. What looks better on a full HD monitor?
720p with 4x transparency Supersampling or 1080p with 0/4xAA?
I have a GTX 470 and I love Supersampling on my current monitor but I fear that at full HD the card might not be able to handle supersampling, even though I only apply transparency supersampling.
So what will look better?
Shambles said:Huge overkill on the PSU. You could cut that wattage in half.
Great to hear.Hazaro said:You should try to keep it below that, but the CPU will slow down and even shut off to prevent damage so no worries. Those are great temps. Make sure you have the lastest version of RealTemp and CoreTemp to check.
brain_stew said:Completely dependant upon your personal preference, the quality of the scaling algorithm and the game in question. Either way be sure to enable hardware scaling in your drivers so that you at least sort the scaling algorithm side of things out.
My HDTV has one of the best consumer scalers around and yes, I do occasionally prefer 720P + lots of AA over 1080p without AA, its totally dependant on the game.
One thing you might be pleased to learn though is that the "transparency multisampling" quality is much improved on the GTX 470, as its affected by coverage samples as well. So you can use 16xCSAA or more ideally 32xCSAA with transparency multisampling and you should get a very comparable quality to 4xmsaa w/ transparency supersampling on alpha aliasing with better quality polygon edges for a much lower cost.
Definitely worth experimenting with and even 32xCSAA @ 1080p really isn't all that demanding for a GTX 470 in the vast majority of games.
Shambles said:Huge overkill on the PSU. You could cut that wattage in half. 650W if you're looking to SLI GTX 460's down the road. Also not sure what the purpose of the F3 is on there. With your primary being an SSD the performance of your secondary drives won't matter that much. I'd drop the F3 and wait until your 2TB drive fills up before adding another.
Sell the copy of Vista to buy Win7.HooCares said:One more Question:
With the build I posted above, would you purchase a copy of Windows 7 to run on it or use a Free copy of Vista Ultimate? Got a free copy in a raffle a couple years ago. Never run 7 before. Is it worth a hundred to run 7 over a free vista?
rise888 said:I guess I was duped by newegg's PSU calculator then.
I wanted to give myself room for SLI down the road and newegg recommended around 900w.
I plan to use the 60gb SSD for the OS and install games to the 1TB. the 2TB was purely for storage.
kittoo said:Thanks brain_stew. Last queries-
How much cost is for transparency Supersampling. I am pretty sure its not as much as full screen supresampling, but any ballpark figure? Is 4xMSAA+SS transparency AA all that more costing than 32xCSAA? I always thought that it did not cost all that much as the SS was working only on transparent objects. Maybe I was wrong
And finally, since it will be a monitor and not a HDTV, hence I doubt it will have a proper scaler in it, will that affect quality much?
Thanks.
cartoon_soldier said:Is there any advantage to getting a small SSD drive for MMO gaming like WoW?
HooCares said:One more Question:
With the build I posted above, would you purchase a copy of Windows 7 to run on it or use a Free copy of Vista Ultimate? Got a free copy in a raffle a couple years ago. Never run 7 before. Is it worth a hundred to run 7 over a free vista?
rise888 said:I guess I was duped by newegg's PSU calculator then.
I wanted to give myself room for SLI down the road and newegg recommended around 900w.
I plan to use the 60gb SSD for the OS and install games to the 1TB. the 2TB was purely for storage.
brain_stew said:If you have to pay the full $100 for Windows 7? Probably not, depends on how tight cash is for you. Vista is still a full x64 OS with DX11 support and plenty of modern features, its mostly the UI that's not as good and the fact it runs slow on low end hardware (which isn't an issue for you). If I didn't get my copy of Windows 7 with a student upgrade I probably wouldn't have made the switch as Vista x64 was already transforming into a very capable OS post SP1.
MomoPufflet said:I looked into this for FFXIV and wasn't at all convinced in my research that it would be worth it. If there are any conclusive tests that prove (IN-GAME) MMORPG performance is noticeably enhanced by an SSD over a 7200 or 10,000rpm drive I would be very interested to read them. I found nothing that would lead me to believe that.
brain_stew said:Wtf!? :lol
Yeah, the SSD wouldn't affect fps, just load times.Macattk15 said:I put WoW on my SSD at first and noticed a difference in how quickly other characters loaded in the game around me, but that was it. Really didn't affect my FPS at all.
So I put the install back on a normal HD.
rise888 said:I guess I was duped by newegg's PSU calculator then.
I wanted to give myself room for SLI down the road and newegg recommended around 900w.
I plan to use the 60gb SSD for the OS and install games to the 1TB. the 2TB was purely for storage.
L0st Id3ntity said:What's the single best cpu air cooler right now?
L0st Id3ntity said:What's the single best cpu air cooler right now?
Shambles said:A GTX 470 is a heck of a card. I would be surprised if you had trouble maxxing out games on it at 19x10 unless you're talking something like metro 2033. Either way have it render at the natural resolution of the display. Stretching an image, especially stretching it by a non-whole number causes the image quality to decrease dramatically. I'll run a game at natural resolution and all settings at low before i'll modift the resolution.
Mad Max said:Playing on a higher resolution decreases the need for AA, and most monitors have terrible upscaling, so I'd just play at 1080p without AA if you have to.
I can't help much butHaeleos said:I need to replace a blown CPU/Mobo in my current PC. That means I'll also need new RAM since I currently have an LGA775 setup. What can I get around $400? The store I will be bringing my prices to deals primarily with ASUS motherboards, so if you can reference some prices off of NCIX.com or newegg.ca (I'm Canadian) it would be a big help with any advice/recommendations. I will be gaming at 1440x900.
He's also offering a complete system (core i5 650, 6gb RAM 1333, 750gb HD, DVD ram drive, +WIN7 HP) for $689 Canadian.
rise888 said:Scythe S-FLEX 120mm Fan 1200rpm
WEGGLES said:
For sure. It's what I haveHaeleos said:So I'm guessing at that price range, the i5 750 is a better deal?
Vigilant Walrus said:So if one was playing at 2560x1200 there would be no need for AA or AF?
WEGGLES said:For sure. It's what I have
Here's the motherboard and memory I'm using. (since you need memory as well)Haeleos said:Motherboard recommendation?