"I need a new PC!" 2010 Edition

Firestorm said:
Alright. Just finished running the 1 hour OCCT test. Core 1 hits a max of 50, Core 2 hits a max of 43, Core 3 hits a max of 44, and Core 4 hits a maximum of 48. Seems good as I think the Core 2 Quad line is supposed to hit 65 max? I'll run it for a longer period of time just to make sure tomorrow. Hopefully 3.4GHz is enough to do well in PCSX2 and Dolphin.

Solid overclock, and very good temps.

I wish my CPU didn't suck. :(
 
Would it even be worth trying to build or buy a gaming (for wow, pretty much) PC with a budget of around 400 dollars?
 
LAUGHTREY said:
Would it even be worth trying to build or buy a gaming (for wow, pretty much) PC with a budget of around 400 dollars?

Do you have any parts that you could cannibalize? Saving on a HDD, PSU, etc... could make a big difference.
 
TheExodu5 said:
400x8 does load, so I'm guessing it's not a Northbridge issue. Would that mean I'm purely CPU limited here?

Also, what are the best apps for temp monitoring and load testing?

edit: I just got a bex error with Firefox. Branch exception. I dunno...I guess my CPU just doesn't like being above 3.0GHz. It's really weird, since it runs fine at 1.3V at 3.0GHz, but can't even do 1.5V at 3.2GHz properly.
It is not weird at all.

My friend got a 'terrible' E7200 that wouldn't budge over 3.0Ghz even with 1.5V (45nm) and raised voltages for everything.
Mine does 3.8 on 1.35V

It happens. I'd use Prime95/ORTHOS/OCCT and Realtemp
 
So reviews are coming out for the new intel Arrandale processors and it looks like the core i5 750 and the phenom II x4 965 outperforms them by a wide margin despite the arrandale being close to $100 more expensive.

LAUGHTREY said:
Would it even be worth trying to build or buy a gaming (for wow, pretty much) PC with a budget of around 400 dollars?

Come back when you have $600 to spend. The difference between a $400 PC and a $600 PC is night and day despite only costing a little bit more. (though a $400 build would serve WoW just fine, but I don't see the point in spending money on a new computer that would struggle in some modern games)
 
TouchMyBox said:
So reviews are coming out for the new intel Arrandale processors and it looks like the core i5 750 and the phenom II x4 965 outperforms them by a wide margin despite the arrandale being close to $100 more expensive.

Does alright in Valve's test:

valve-particle-shot.jpg

valve-particle.gif


Looks like it can hold it's own alright on average, thanks to the 3.33ghz clock, but nothing to write home about really I think.

Edit: Looks like it also score significantly better than a X4 965 w/ 785G in 3D Vantage too.
 
I had a question on soundcards.. I recently built an i7 920 rig and im using the onboard audio for sound (Realtek audio, Gigabyte EX58-UD3R motherboard) but I also have an older X-Fi XtremeMusic PCI soundcard in my previous PC.

Would there be any advantage of using the X-Fi in my i7 setup? Any difference in performance? people are telling me the x-fi has hardware acceleration and the realtek doesn't, not sure if there's any truth there.

Thanks.
 
JRW said:
I had a question on soundcards.. I recently built an i7 920 rig and im using the onboard audio for sound (Realtek audio, Gigabyte EX58-UD3R motherboard) but I also have an older X-Fi XtremeMusic PCI soundcard in my previous PC.

Would there be any advantage of using the X-Fi in my i7 setup? Any difference in performance? people are telling me the x-fi has hardware acceleration and the realtek doesn't, not sure if there's any truth there.

Thanks.

Yes it does have hardware acceleration. It'll gain you a few frames in some games, since it can take some load of your CPU.
 
Since nobody else answered my question about SSDs, is the Intel X25-E (not the widely known X25-M) any good? And what about the Mushkin IO Series?

Are they worth 200 bucks (80GB and 64GB respectively)?
 
Durante said:
For gaming a X25-E isn't worth it over a M.

For gaming, a SSD isn't worth it period, the price you pay gets you essentially no additional FPS, and you end up with significantly less HDD space (by a factor of like 20x).
 
Minsc said:
For gaming, a SSD isn't worth it period, the price you pay gets you essentially no additional FPS, and you end up with significantly less HDD space (by a factor of like 20x).

Well, I could use the extra access speed for photoshop and the such. And I would be using it as an OS and programs only drive, keeping everything else in the HD I already own.
 
An 80GB X-25E drive for $200 is an insane deal. The X-25E is both faster and more reliable than the X-25M.

18639.png


18640.png


18641.png


18642.png


18643.png


Since X-25E uses SLC memory, it also gives you 10x the amount of writes compared to regular MLC drives. This won't really affect home users so much though since you won't be writing to the HDD nearly as much as a server would.

Let me tell you, now that I've been using an SSD, I never want to be without one again. It's so awesome to load up Windows in 10 seconds (from the Windows loading screen) and have everything working right away. Even with MSN, Steam, and other startup utilities booting up, my PC loads up faster than my router can assign me an IP address.
 
Minsc said:
For gaming, a SSD isn't worth it period, the price you pay gets you essentially no additional FPS, and you end up with significantly less HDD space (by a factor of like 20x).

Ahh, but it is so worth it outside of gaming. This thing is going to pay for itself in no time flat in energy bills cause I actually turn off my computer every time I step away from it. As long as you got a HDD too of course. And you could put a few loading screen intensive games on it to speed performance.
 
Minsc said:
For gaming, a SSD isn't worth it period, the price you pay gets you essentially no additional FPS, and you end up with significantly less HDD space (by a factor of like 20x).

You sure? Everyone in the old thread said it helps a little bit having ssd due to faster seek times.
 
Well, my question is because there seems to be a MLC version of X25-E (the SLC prices are insane, around 500-600€)
 
dionysus said:
Ahh, but it is so worth it outside of gaming. This thing is going to pay for itself in no time flat in energy bills cause I actually turn off my computer every time I step away from it. As long as you got a HDD too of course. And you could put a few loading screen intensive games on it to speed performance.

Haha yeah I actually started turning my PC off now that I have an SSD. Windows shutdown takes around 1-2 seconds now, when it used to take around 20-30 (when everything is written back to the HDD). Bootup is fast. 40 seconds or so...as soon as my desktop pops up it's ready to use, when I used to have to wait a good 30-40 seconds for my PC to be good to go before.
 
beje said:
Since nobody else answered my question about SSDs, is the Intel X25-E (not the widely known X25-M) any good? And what about the Mushkin IO Series?

Are they worth 200 bucks (80GB and 64GB respectively)?

Where are you seeing x-25e for $200? They're $800 on newegg...
 
TheExodu5 said:
Haha yeah I actually started turning my PC off now that I have an SSD. Windows shutdown takes around 1-2 seconds now, when it used to take around 20-30 (when everything is written back to the HDD). Bootup is fast. 40 seconds or so...as soon as my desktop pops up it's ready to use, when I used to have to wait a good 30-40 seconds for my PC to be good to go before.

I am surprised bootup is so long. I haven't timed mine but I would say mine is less than 20s from completely off to all startup programs loaded.
 
dionysus said:
I am surprised bootup is so long. I haven't timed mine but I would say mine is less than 20s from completely off to all startup programs loaded.

I'm counting the POST screen, which takes up 15-20 seconds of my bootup time.

I'm going to go time it right now. I'll time the POST, desktop, and time it takes me to get to this thread. :)
 
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:
Where are you seeing x-25e for $200? They're $800 on newegg...

24n4e53.jpg


Descriptions are copy-pasted though. The main reason I'm asking is because I couldn't find any online reviews for the MLC versions (obviously slower, and judging from the price a step behind X25-M). SLC versions are insane.
 
TheExodu5 said:
An 80GB X-25E drive for $200 is an insane deal. The X-25E is both faster and more reliable than the X-25M.


Since X-25E uses SLC memory, it also gives you 10x the amount of writes compared to regular MLC drives. This won't really affect home users so much though since you won't be writing to the HDD nearly as much as a server would.

Let me tell you, now that I've been using an SSD, I never want to be without one again. It's so awesome to load up Windows in 10 seconds (from the Windows loading screen) and have everything working right away. Even with MSN, Steam, and other startup utilities booting up, my PC loads up faster than my router can assign me an IP address.


where do you keep your games though?
 
MLC should be the X-25M.

evil solrac v3.0 said:
where do you keep your games though?

I have a 1TB WD Caviar Black drive for games. I also use a 1TB WD Caviar Green for media.

drives.png


Anyways, I did some rough timings:

Time to shutdown (with Firefox, Steam, MSN open):
5.2 seconds

Time to POST:
22.1 seconds

Time from loading Windows to full desktop:
19.7 seconds

Time to enter this thread:
8.5 seconds (I attribute this to slow router IP address assigning :))

This is with Windows 7 64-bit.

Overclocking takes a good 5 seconds of extra bootup time on my motherboard...I do wish I had a faster POSTing board though.
 
zoku88 said:
Are you sure that's right/?


I thought all of the E's were SLC and all of the M's were MLC...

TheExodu5 said:
MLC should be the X-25M.

It's weird, because that's not precisely the cheapest store out there and X25-M are around 280€ (80GB) and 520€ (160GB) everywhere else so that's why I guessed it was a different model.
 
Hey everyone,

I have a $900 budget and am looking to build the best gaming PC I can for that. I am hoping it will be good at running most new games with maximum settings. I have an old steam account with Crysis & GTA 4 so would like something that can handle those.

I don't have any parts to spare from the machine I currently have so this is a start at square one job for me.

Can anyone help with a good list of components and prices and where to get them?

I am in the U.S. by the way.

Thanks and anyones help is much appreciated.

Cy
 
Anyone know what kind of RAM is the best to get if I'm looking to get 8 Gigs (2 gig sticks x4)? Figured I might as well replace the whole thing since some of the RAM is getting faulty
 
vehn said:
Anyone know what kind of RAM is the best to get if I'm looking to get 8 Gigs (2 gig sticks x4)? Figured I might as well replace the whole thing since some of the RAM is getting faulty

As long as you get a good brand it doesn't matter all that much. Do you really need 8GB?

cybropm said:
Hey everyone,

I have a $900 budget and am looking to build the best gaming PC I can for that. I am hoping it will be good at running most new games with maximum settings. I have an old steam account with Crysis & GTA 4 so would like something that can handle those.

I don't have any parts to spare from the machine I currently have so this is a start at square one job for me.

Can anyone help with a good list of components and prices and where to get them?

I am in the U.S. by the way.

Thanks and anyones help is much appreciated.

Cy

Newegg is probably the best but there is a bunch of good places in the OP that you should price check for any big savings. Is there anything special you want to do or just gaming? Do you have a windows license you can use or is that part of the $900?
 
vehn said:
Anyone know what kind of RAM is the best to get if I'm looking to get 8 Gigs (2 gig sticks x4)? Figured I might as well replace the whole thing since some of the RAM is getting faulty

Do you need 8GB? 4GB should be plenty for just about everyone's needs atm. I'm just saying this because it's better to run 2 sticks than 4 sticks if you can.
 
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:
As long as you get a good brand it doesn't matter all that much. Do you really need 8GB?

Guess I don't. Is 8 gb not much of a difference from 4gb for gaming? I had 4 GB but whenever I turned on my computer it would take about 5 minutes, so I took out a stick and it boots up fine now, leaving me with 3GB. Just tired of certain things taking too long / lagging, such as when I'm playing L4D2 and I'm unable to open the steam overlay and chat with people while loading into a map, just freezes and doesn't do anything until the map loads

Wish I looked at one of these threads before I bought my computer from 2.5 years ago. Spent $1,800 on it, granted I did buy Windows Vista for $220, such a rip off! Plus I bought a CPU cooler which didn't come in until the next day so I ended up not trying to isntall it until a year later and it broke as I tried to put it in...
 
Ok, I have a machine I built a couple years ago now....I'm really just looking for upgrading my GPU.

Right now I have:

Q6600
4GB DDR2
8800GT 512MB

could I upgrade just my GPU and be able to play like GTAIV and Crysis in 1680x1050 at high settings? If so which one should I go with (seemingly just doing some quick looking around, the Radeon HD 5770 seems to be a good choice? no?)
 
vehn said:
Guess I don't. Is 8 gb not much of a difference from 4gb for gaming? I had 4 GB but whenever I turned on my computer it would take about 5 minutes, so I took out a stick and it boots up fine now, leaving me with 3GB. Just tired of certain things taking too long / lagging, such as when I'm playing L4D2 and I'm unable to open the steam overlay and chat with people while loading into a map, just freezes and doesn't do anything until the map loads

Wish I looked at one of these threads before I bought my computer from 2.5 years ago. Spent $1,800 on it, granted I did buy Windows Vista for like $250, such a rip off!

8GB isn't going to eliminate that split second lag most likely. Have you tried to fix it running 4gbs at all? If you can't do 4gb you can't do 8gb as it's most likely something wrong with their being 4 physical sticks and not how big they are. Have you tried slightly upping the voltage? It could be the voltage is too low so it has problems or your bios could be really outdated and it won't work because of that or a variety of other reasons.
 
vehn said:
Guess I don't. Is 8 gb not much of a difference from 4gb for gaming? I had 4 GB but whenever I turned on my computer it would take about 5 minutes, so I took out a stick and it boots up fine now, leaving me with 3GB. Just tired of certain things taking too long / lagging, such as when I'm playing L4D2 and I'm unable to open the steam overlay and chat with people while loading into a map, just freezes and doesn't do anything until the map loads

Wish I looked at one of these threads before I bought my computer from 2.5 years ago. Spent $1,800 on it, granted I did buy Windows Vista for $220, such a rip off! Plus I bought a CPU cooler which didn't come in until the next day so I ended up not trying to isntall it until a year later and it broke as I tried to put it in...

Your HDD is most likely the limiting factor in cases like this.

Anyways, if you actually do want to get RAM, here's a nice set:

Mushkin 2x2GB PC2-6400 (800MHz) 4-4-4-12 timings:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820146726

A pricey $89...but DDR2 really hiked in price.

Also
PQI 2x2GB PC2-5300 (667MHz) 4-4-4-12 timings:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820141240

If you're not overclocking, and never plan on it, you can save $14. I'd probably go with Mushkin just to have that option open.
 
MikeE21286 said:
Ok, I have a machine I built a couple years ago now....I'm really just looking for upgrading my GPU.

Right now I have:

Q6600
4GB DDR2
8800GT 512MB

could I upgrade just my GPU and be able to play like GTAIV and Crysis in 1680x1050 at high settings? If so which one should I go with (seemingly just doing some quick looking around, the Radeon HD 5770 seems to be a good choice? no?)

http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.p...sk=view&id=383&Itemid=47&limit=1&limitstart=8

That site has some benchmarks.
 
HD 5770 is an upgrade, but it almost doesn't seem worth it over an 8800GT. It's like halfway in between 8800GT and GTX275/HD4890.
 
Thanks for the advice....sounds like a 5770 would just be a stop-gap as opposed to a "for real" upgrade.

gonna have to do some more research.
 
Are you overclocking your CPU? If you're willing to spend $300 on an HD 5850 and overclock your CPU you'd get a pretty huge upgrade.
 
TheExodu5 said:
Your HDD is most likely the limiting factor in cases like this.

Anyways, if you actually do want to get RAM, here's a nice set:

Mushkin 2x2GB PC2-6400 (800MHz) 4-4-4-12 timings:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820146726

A pricey $89...but DDR2 really hiked in price.

Also
PQI 2x2GB PC2-5300 (667MHz) 4-4-4-12 timings:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820141240

If you're not overclocking, and never plan on it, you can save $14. I'd probably go with Mushkin just to have that option open.

Why not get a more know brand for that kind of money? I've never heard of PQI or mushkin.
 
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:
You sure? Everyone in the old thread said it helps a little bit having ssd due to faster seek times.

Yea, I specifically said the fps wouldn't increase and it won't as that 99% dependent on GPU + CPU. Games may load slightly faster (and they may not), keep in mind normal HDDs can read large files very well, which is why I suspect loading times in games don't always benefit with a SSD.
 
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:
Why not get a more know brand for that kind of money? I've never heard of PQI or mushkin.

Mushkin has a great reputation, though they are fairly new. They came out of nowhere like G.Skill did a few years back.
 
TheExodu5 said:
Mushkin has a great reputation, though they are fairly new. They came out of nowhere like G.Skill did a few years back.

Mushkin I've heard of but I haven't heard much either way so I guess they're decent but for the same price you can get a well known brand like OCZ or the like.

Minsc said:
Yea, I specifically said the fps wouldn't increase and it won't as that 99% dependent on GPU + CPU. Games may load slightly faster (and they may not), keep in mind normal HDDs can read large files very well, which is why I suspect loading times in games don't always benefit with a SSD.

Makes sense, I want to get one eventually just for my normal OS stuff.
 
Does anyone have a recommendation as to which brand of 5870 I should get?

I plan on upgrading from a 9800gx2. Newegg had 2 xfx 5870's in-stock over the weekend; 1 at stock clocks for $404 and another with slight overclock for $427.99.

I was going to get the cheaper one and oc it myself, but it appears to be gone from the site now. Should I just get the other (xfx has dbl warranty) or should I get a cheaper card and OC it?

Also is my CPU going to be a bottleneck with the new card? Its a C2D E8500 OC'd to 3.8ghz.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
blackMamba1187 said:
Does anyone have a recommendation as to which brand of 5870 I should get?

I plan on upgrading from a 9800gx2. Newegg had 2 xfx 5870's in-stock over the weekend; 1 at stock clocks for $404 and another with slight overclock for $427.99.

I was going to get the cheaper one and oc it myself, but it appears to be gone from the site now. Should I just get the other (xfx has dbl warranty) or should I get a cheaper card and OC it?

Also is my CPU going to be a bottleneck with the new card? Its a C2D E8500 OC'd to 3.8ghz.

Any help would be appreciated.

Overclocking is easy to do yourself, I would worry about a good brand over it being overclocked.

Sapphire, HIS, XFX, etc. should all be good brands to look at.

Edit: Your cpu may bottleneck a little bit but it shouldn't matter much at that ghz and It will give you a sizable boost in performance even if you are bottlenecked. Unless you have performance problems I wouldn't worry about it. And obviously it depends on other factors of your pc. It won't be a waste to get the 5870 if that's what you're asking. Maybe get a 5850 instead depending on your needs.
 
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:
Overclocking is easy to do yourself, I would worry about a good brand over it being overclocked.

Sapphire, HIS, XFX, etc. should all be good brands to look at.

Could you recommend a good brand? :D Is XFX bad?

edit: thanks
 
Top Bottom