Minsc
Gold Member
Caesar III said:The random acces is over the whole disc, right? Did you read the text or just scan through the results? The realworld tests are what is relevant with this one IMHO.
I mostly use the above mentioned applications on my notebook which could easily fit into the 4GB after some time. So I think those are more relevant:
AND it is significant cheaper than a SSD.
Well, it seems to me like a half-solution. It's $180 right? That's not "much cheaper" that's like $20 cheaper than a 80GB Intel SSD which will do the job better, and not for just 6 apps.
There's this too:
"The launch of Seagate's Momentus XT hard drive was discussed here last week, and for good reason. While not the first hybrid hard drive on the market, the XT is the only one that sheds the Windows ReadyDrive scheme for an OS-independent approach Seagate calls Adaptive Memory. While early coverage of the XT was largely positive, more detailed analysis reveals a number of performance issues, including poor sequential read throughput and an apparent problem with command queuing. In a number of tests, the XT is actually slower than Seagate's year-old Momentus 7200.4, a drive that costs $40 less."
I think the drive is interesting and had potential, I read a bunch of stuff about it, but my advice personally is pass on it for a real SSD. If you could only have one HDD and not two, perhaps it becomes more appealing, so there may be a specific case where it could be useful, but the tech could use some tweaking, and probably will improve significantly as other companies try their take at this.
Edit: Not to mention it still has all the faults of a standard HDD, heat, failure, noise etc, where a SSD wouldn't have failure/heat/noise issues.