brain_stew said:I guess people like the advice in this thread.
I'm not surprised, there are a lot of knowledgeable people here and responses are typically very fast if not almost instant. :lolbrain_stew said:You know I always wondered about the popularity of this thread. I mean this one is at nearly half a million views and we're only just over half way through the year.
Try typing "i need a new PC" (quotations marks not needed) into Google and see what the second result is.![]()
I guess people like the advice in this thread. If you're listening online retailers, I could do with a job! :lol
toasty_T said:For comparisons sake with a 5850 RE5 8xAA with blur gave me an average of 97.9fps.
How do we know you are not on their payroll already, eh brain_stew?brain_stew said:You know I always wondered about the popularity of this thread. I mean this one is at nearly half a million views and we're only just over half way through the year.
Try typing "i need a new PC" (quotations marks not needed) into Google and see what the second result is.![]()
I guess people like the advice in this thread. If you're listening online retailers, I could do with a job! :lol
Stormtrooper30 said:Anyone have a good OCing guide for the i5 750 and GTX 460? Looking to get the most out of my PC and use the rediculous cooling I have.
DennisK4 said:How do we know you are not on their payroll already, eh brain_stew?
You suuuure are fond of those nVidia GPUs......moneyhats!
Toki767 said:Power consumption on the 5870 is about 354 on Load and like 141 on idle so I think you should be fine. I'd like to think Dell knows what they're doing when they're putting a nice video card into a machine. :lol
Good choice, if I was going pre built that would definitely be the machine id go with.apocalidiot said:Thank you x a million! I think I'm going to order the PC now!![]()
Smokey said:Good choice, if I was going pre built that would definitely be the machine id go with.
apocalidiot said:Thanks! I was planning on building a PC myself, but I put it off for a bit and that kind of forced me to go with a pre built. But I'm happy with what I'm getting, so thanks a ton to everyone again.
Last but not least, does anyone have any recommendations for monitors? I've been searching around and looking at different "top 10" lists, but a lot of these are the top of the line monitors that come with a hefty price tag. Does anyone have any past experience with something moderately priced? Is $200 reasonable for a good monitor?
edit: I've been looking at LCD vs LED and I'm pretty sure I won't care about the differences. So I'm guessing LCD would be the cheaper route
PjotrStroganov said:![]()
I use a Logitech UltraX black version. 15 euros over here.
brain_stew said:"LED" monitors are LCDs. Anything under $200 is going to be a TN panel, so that means dithering, shitty colours and viewing angles.
apocalidiot said:I kind of figured that.. I work at a certain store that handles a lot of TV's and the only difference I knew was that LED's are just thin LCD's. I dunno anything about the specifics about it.. haha. I just didn't know if the LED's were more expensive than LCD's since they're relatively newer.
Doing some research, this one seems to be a great deal for the price.. and just a good monitor overall
Unless I should stay away from Samsungs for some reason... haha
brain_stew said:$300 for a TN panel definitely isn't a great deal.
brain_stew said::lol I wish I bloody was!! I could sure do with the cash right about now! :lol
apocalidiot said:Balls. I don't want yall to do research for me without doing any for myself, so I was wondering if you had any base advice so I could search for a better deal? What should I be looking for when buying a monitor?
brain_stew said:Any modern TN panel is going to be roughly the same quality, so don't pay more than $200 for one. I wouldn't pay a premium for an LED backlight.
At $300+ range see what VA or IPS panels you can find, heck a 26-32" 1080p HDTV, even from a low end brand may not be a bad buy so long as it supports 1:1 pixel mapping over HDMI. Its often the cheapest way to get a none-TN panel these days. 1:1 pixel mapping support is crucial though, without it, its useless as a monitor.
If you do your research and find out whether or not something like this:
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Insigni...HDTV/9574098.p?id=1218127627562&skuId=9574098
supports 1:1 pixel mapping, the image quality will utterly shit all over any TN panel including the one you picked out.
brain_stew said:Any modern TN panel is going to be roughly the same quality, so don't pay more than $200 for one. I wouldn't pay a premium for an LED backlight.
At $300+ range see what VA or IPS panels you can find, heck a 26-32" 1080p HDTV, even from a low end brand may not be a bad buy so long as it supports 1:1 pixel mapping over HDMI. Its often the cheapest way to get a none-TN panel these days. 1:1 pixel mapping support is crucial though, without it, its useless as a monitor.
If you do your research and find out whether or not something like this:
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Insigni...HDTV/9574098.p?id=1218127627562&skuId=9574098
supports 1:1 pixel mapping, the image quality will utterly shit all over any TN panel including the one you picked out.
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:It says page not found![]()
Minsc said:The intel X-25M is outclassed now, but gets recommended so much still because of how popular it was.
apocalidiot said:Well... I looked it up and Insignia's do support 1:1 pixel mapping... and this works out nicely because I work at Best Buy and I'm pretty sure they own Insignia.. so I should get at least something off thanks to the discount. So you would suggest a HDTV over a monitor if it has 1:1 pixel mapping?
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Insigni...8127627562&skuId=9574098&st=9574098&cp=1&lp=1
I got the sku from the link, haha
There are affordable e-IPS PC monitors now in the $300 range. I have a NEC EA231WMi. There's also the Viewsonic VP2365wb and Dell U2311H. All of these use the 1080p e-IPS panel made by LG.brain_stew said:Any modern TN panel is going to be roughly the same quality, so don't pay more than $200 for one. I wouldn't pay a premium for an LED backlight.
At $300+ range see what VA or IPS panels you can find, heck a 26-32" 1080p HDTV, even from a low end brand may not be a bad buy so long as it supports 1:1 pixel mapping over HDMI. Its often the cheapest way to get a none-TN panel these days. 1:1 pixel mapping support is crucial though, without it, its useless as a monitor.
If you do your research and find out whether or not something like this:
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Insigni...27627562&skuId=9574098&st=26" 1080p&cp=1&lp=1
supports 1:1 pixel mapping, the image quality will utterly shit all over any TN panel including the one you picked out.
vazel said:There are affordable e-IPS panels now in the $300 range. I have a NEC EA231WMi. There's also the Viewsonic VP2365wb and Dell U2311H. All of these use the 1080p e-IPS panel made by LG.
The response time is 14ms for B2W and 16.7ms for G2G. There is blurring. But I'd rather take the blurring than the bad colors and viewing angle yellow tinting of TN panels. As a CRT and plasma fanboy I find the black levels on any LCD disappointing this one being no exception, but at least the colors are great. Here's a review by tftcentral. http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/nec_ea231wmi.htmbrain_stew said:Either way, he certainly doesn't want to get a $300 TN panel like he was originally going to.
How do you find the NEC? What is the response time and black levels like?
I can agree with the viewing angle, all I need to do is move my head to the side by about a foot and everything starts changing shade, but I still think a LED lit screen is lovely to look at, i've never seen my pc or 360 look so good and i've tried a few different flatscreens over the years of all sizes and shapes.brain_stew said:"LED" monitors are LCDs. Anything under $200 is going to be a TN panel, so that means dithering, shitty colours and viewing angles.
brain_stew said:At your price range? Absolutely, its likely the only way you'll really be able to afford a none-TN panel and it will be much more enjoyable for games and media in general. The pixel pitch is still pretty damn high and its useful for hooking other stuff upto as well.
Its the processing that low end models like this cheap out on, but since you'll be bypassing all that, its a none issue. You might want to check to see if this particular model ahs major issues with input lag but if it has a 1:1 pixel mode then that is unlikely.
Since you work there, you might as well try hooking up a PC/laptop up to one of them efor buying, just to ensure it works well with a PC (it should).
vazel said:There are affordable e-IPS PC monitors now in the $300 range. I have a NEC EA231WMi. There's also the Viewsonic VP2365wb and Dell U2311H. All of these use the 1080p e-IPS panel made by LG.
brain_stew said:Well I'd take the bigger screen, better contrast and extra inputs personally but its an option worth considering. Depends on the usage I guess, I know he plans to play plenty games on this thing so a bigger screen with better contrast is going to deliver a better experience there whereas slightly more accurate colours and a better pixel pitch would be more suited for professional work.
Either way, he certainly doesn't want to get a $300 TN panel like he was originally going to.
How do you find the NEC? What is the response time and black levels like?
when you say shitty colors. do you mean SHITTY colors or marginally inferior colors? because when i look at photos on my tn panel monitor things look about right. maybe i lucked out on my monitor.brain_stew said:"LED" monitors are LCDs. Anything under $200 is going to be a TN panel, so that means dithering, shitty colours and viewing angles.
PC monitors have color calibration settings in the OSD. HDTVs have this through a service menu. If you're getting an HDTV make sure it has a service menu and try to read other people's experiences with it.apocalidiot said:Are the differences between the two a big deal? I would be still using the pc for video editing (going into Digital Cinema), but I'm guessing that using a HDTV would serve just as good as purpose as a e-IPS would?
TN panels can only natively produce 262,144 colors. They get 16 million colors through dithering. They also have color shifting when viewed from off angle. If you care about good color you should avoid TN panels.-COOLIO- said:when you say shitty colors. do you mean SHITTY colors or marginally inferior colors? because when i look at photos on my tn panel monitor things look about right. maybe i lucked out on my monitor.
-COOLIO- said:when you say shitty colors. do you mean SHITTY colors or marginally inferior colors? because when i look at photos on my tn panel monitor things look about right. maybe i lucked out on my monitor.
Maybe I lucked out then because I seen no dithering yet unless is no where near wii and psp levelsvazel said:PC monitors have color calibration settings in the OSD. HDTVs have this through a service menu. If you're getting an HDTV make sure it has a service menu and try to read other people's experiences with it.TN panels can only natively produce 262,144 colors. They get 16 million colors through dithering. They also have color shifting when viewed from off angle. If you care about good color you should avoid TN panels.
handy program, just ran it and i'm fine when it comes to no dithering, woo!brain_stew said:No I mean shitty colours. They're 6 bit in nature and cover a huge amount of the colour gamut through dithering. If you look close at your panel, you should be able to see lots of dancing pixels, also give this colour gradients test a go:
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/downloads/Colour_Gradients.exe
All the bars should show a perfectly smooth gradient, with no visible steps or banding.
It's a different kind of dithering called temporal dithering. You will not see blatant dithering dots like in traditional dithering but the color is still bad.Diablohead said:Maybe I lucked out then because I seen no dithering yet unless is no where near wii and psp levels, as someone who does 3D work if I noticed dithering on my screen it would have gone back no questions asked.
Reading this thread sometimes get's me paranoid lol.
Shows the 2009 version for me :\brain_stew said:You know I always wondered about the popularity of this thread. I mean this one is at nearly half a million views and we're only just over half way through the year.
Try typing "i need a new PC" (quotations marks not needed) into Google and see what the second result is.![]()
I guess people like the advice in this thread. If you're listening online retailers, I could do with a job! :lol
i care about good color. id consider an upgrade if the color was substantially better, but are we talking good colour as in how graphic artists need pitch perfect colour when they're designing a flyer, or good color as in things will look noticeably better? i know hdtvs dont use tn panels but i dont think i see a difference in color not accounting for viewing angles.vazel said:PC monitors have color calibration settings in the OSD. HDTVs have this through a service menu. If you're getting an HDTV make sure it has a service menu and try to read other people's experiences with it.TN panels can only natively produce 262,144 colors. They get 16 million colors through dithering. They also have color shifting when viewed from off angle. If you care about good color you should avoid TN panels.
ah right, well i still have 11 days or so to return this screen if it's going to get in the way of my work but so far so good, it's better then my old early-2006 samsung lcd so it's off to a good start!vazel said:It's a different kind of dithering called temporal dithering. You will not see blatant dithering dots like in traditional dithering but the color is still bad.
vazel said:PC monitors have color calibration settings in the OSD. HDTVs have this through a service menu. .
i see bands ya but they're pretty faint.brain_stew said:No I mean shitty colours. They're 6 bit in nature and cover a huge amount of the colour gamut through dithering. If you look close at your panel, you should be able to see lots of dancing pixels, also give this colour gradients test a go:
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/downloads/Colour_Gradients.exe
All the bars should show a perfectly smooth gradient, with no visible steps or banding.
-COOLIO- said:i care about good color. id consider an upgrade if the color was substantially better, but are we talking good colour as in how graphic artists need pitch perfect colour when they're designing a flyer, or good color as in things will look noticeably better? i know hdtvs dont use tn panels but i dont think i see a difference in color not accounting for viewing angles.
I don't mean to make any of you feel bad for your purchases. To me the differences are horrifying but different people have different standards. The popularity of TN panels shows most don't care. If you can't notice with your own eyes what it is we're talking about then don't worry about it.Diablohead said:ah right, well i still have 11 days or so to return this screen if it's going to get in the way of my work but so far so good, it's better then my old early-2006 samsung lcd so it's off to a good start!
Lkr said:Shows the 2009 version for me :\
-COOLIO- said:i see bands ya but they're pretty faint.
edit: great now i thiiiink i see bands on my background. ignorance is bliss :[
ya, fair enough.vazel said:I don't mean to make any of you feel bad for your purchases. To me the differences are horrifying but different people have different standards. The popularity of TN panels shows most don't care. If you can't notice with your own eyes what it is we're talking about then don't worry about it.
$100 sounds good to me, batman uses the physx stuff well for eye candy but it's not worth $100 to me.Corky said:hmm is there even a reason to keep any of my gts 250s for physX? I mean I could get around 100$ for each of them.
Should I omit that potential 100$ , which would go in my future pc-upgrade fund ( ssds, new fans, another 460, new psu , cpu etc) in order to get physX in maybe one or two games that I'm planning to buy that support it...?
Get an SSD.Corky said:hmm is there even a reason to keep any of my gts 250s for physX? I mean I could get around 100$ for each of them.
Should I omit that potential 100$ , which would go in my future pc-upgrade fund ( ssds, new fans, another 460, new psu , cpu etc) in order to get physX in maybe one or two games that I'm planning to buy that support it...?