Also (since I've seen a few posts do this) I'm selling my old hardware in the B/S/T thread.
Corsair HX520W, PNY GTX 260, eVGA GTX 295
Corsair HX520W, PNY GTX 260, eVGA GTX 295
Disable pll overvoltage in the BIOSScuba Steve said:So here's my deal. I just upgraded my computer, installed a new mobo (Asus P8P67), CPU (i5 2500k), RAM (G SKill 4GB), and PSU (Corsair TX750). Everything is running great since I upgraded about a week ago, it's just that everytime the computer goes into sleep mode, it'll wake up when I move the mouse or press a key, but the display won't turn on. What can I do to fix this?
Prophet Steve said:Thanks for the help.
KVM is from what I understand for multiple PC's, not monitors, but connecting multiple monitors will probably not be a problem.
I have changed and added some stuff, also my friend went loose and changed all kinds of things so now I have two completely different builds. Any suggestions on what to pick or not pick?
I use my old hard drive, so that isn't needed.
Mine, based on the GAF $1000 build:
http://tweakers.net/gallery/297490?wish_id=169532#tab:wenslijst
My friends:
http://tweakers.net/gallery/297490?wish_id=176907#tab:wenslijst
Budget around 1000 euros, more specifications I had given earlier this page (100 posts). Any feedback is appreciated.
edit: Ok, previous page.
His parts reflected quiet options which is why I didn't say anything.n0n44m said:Mugen 2 + Corsair Vengeance = very tight fit with the fan on the front
I had that combo before going water, and I had to lift the fan on the front (I had 2 fans installed) on top of the front Vengeance module (they were in 2nd & 4th slots), which in turn slightly pressed it against my sidepanel in a 690 II
if you're in the south of .nl as well I have that 690 II Advanced + extra window'ed sidepanel for sale if you're interested, PM me for that
also your friend can get a Corsair TX650v2 for the same price as that Nexus (which is non-modular as well as far as I can tell) ... I like the Corsair (TX/HX/AX) brand better![]()
Hazaro said:His parts reflected quiet options which is why I didn't say anything.
Hazaro said:Disable pll overvoltage in the BIOS
Jibbed said:Just a quick question, is an 850W Coolermaster PSU enough to run 2 580's in SLI? I've got one at the moment, considering buying a second for BF3.
Yes itll handle it and then some.Jibbed said:Just a quick question, is an 850W Coolermaster PSU enough to run 2 580's in SLI? I've got one at the moment, considering buying a second for BF3.
Ezahn said:Could you guys please advise me on what needs to be done? I mean, is there a preferred order for installing the drivers, do I need to alter some BIOS settings before installing Windows, do I need to somewhat prepare the SSD disk for being the boot disk....? Stuff like that.
knitoe said:If you want physx, go Nvidia. For $300 after $30 rebate, you could get a few GTX570 on newegg. Or, $200 for many GTX560. And, with those cards, you could drop the 8600GT for physx.
evil solrac v3.0 said:an 8600gt for physX with a 560 or 570 would be worse performing than if he had no physX card.
MysticX said:I need some advice regarding a passig VGA, I have 2 cards which cost the same:
ASUS GEFORCE GT 210 1GB DDR3 PCI-E VGA/DVI/HDMI SILENT LP
ASUS RADEON HD5450 1GB DDR3 PCI-E VGA/DVI/HDMI SILENT LP
they cost the same. I am thinking the Ati.
daviyoung said:My SSD basically set itself up.
Before you do this though, go into your BIOS and enable the SATA channel for your Samsung HDD (if the builders haven't already done this) so that once Windows starts you can format it.
I wouldn't say unsafe (since most PSUs are rated for continuous power), but under heavy load situations you can peak very close if the 12V can't deliver nearly all of that power.Ezahn said:I think I remember Hazaro saying that a very good 850W (eg the Corsair AX850) could do it, a basic one wasn't that safe.
-viper- said:Initially when I got my PC it was at 3.3Ghz (i5 2500k) and the temperatures were really cool at 32 degrees.
Now ever since I opened ASUS AI Tweak, the CPU timings have all gone haywire.
It runs at 1.3GHZ now, and the temps have shot up to 38 degrees C. Occasionally it might shoot to 3.7GHz. How do I return it to normal?
But I don't understand. When I first got my PC, the temps were 30-32 degrees C. Now they're 38 degrees C at a lower voltage and clock speed?mike23 said:It's underclocking it when you don't need the extra speed to save electricity and generate less heat.
Once you start using something CPU intensive, you'll see it shoot up the the full speed. It can also bump up to 3.7ghz with turbo. (turbo is normal, but isn't full time)
It seems like there's nothing wrong and your cpu is running at stock settings.
Also, 38C is not hot at all. Under 70C is generally where you want to be under load with an overclock.
-viper- said:But I don't understand. When I first got my PC, the temps were 30-32 degrees C. Now they're 38 degrees C at a lower voltage and clock speed?
I have a Noctua D14. I feel really annoyed at the fact I paid for an expensive cooler and it isn't doing it's job well.
You don't understand, you are trying to compare idle temps with temps when you are doing something. You haven't seen your CPU cooler do anything. Run prime95 or covert a video or something. The temp at load is what you care about and is something you can easily compare. If you just look at your temps randomly, they will be greatly different depending on what your PC is doing. Load temps should be 50-60 degrees and be perfectly normal. No need to be annoyed.-viper- said:But I don't understand. When I first got my PC, the temps were 30-32 degrees C. Now they're 38 degrees C at a lower voltage and clock speed?
I have a Noctua D14. I feel really annoyed at the fact I paid for an expensive cooler and it isn't doing it's job well.
I'm comparing two idle temps. It was 30-32 degrees for a week. Weather was pretty much the same as it is now.mike23 said:You probably just saw it at a low the first time on a colder day or after it had been idling for a while or something.
Also, it takes barely a fraction of a second for it to return to it's normal speed, so you're not really at a lower clock. If you watch it during normal use, it'll bump up and down quite a bit. So the temperature would reflect the idle temp at the higher speed if you were measuring it while using the computer.
The real test for your temps should be under load. Run prime95 for 5-10 minutes and check the temperatures then. Idle temp isn't that important as long as it isn't outrageous.
-viper- said:I'm comparing two idle temps. It was 30-32 degrees for a week. Weather was pretty much the same as it is now.
Now ever since I clicked on the ASUS utility, the 'power saving' options kicked in and the temps have been raised.
I don't think you understand me - previously on CPU-Z it was 3300Mhz. Idle temps were around 29, 29, 33, 27.mike23 said:They were already on. They're enabled by default, you just didn't notice before.
Like Veins and I already said, the true measure is the temp under full load.
Also, if you saw the CPU bump up to 3.7ghz, then it wasn't really idle.
MysticX said:agreed, I tried that with my 5770 and it wasn´t any good.
-viper- said:I don't think you understand me - previously on CPU-Z it was 3300Mhz. Idle temps were around 29, 29, 33, 27.
Now It's 1600Mhz and idle temps are: 35, 34, 38, 31. Load temps at 3.7Ghz = 54C.
Why did it shoot up? Also one core seems to be hotter. Should I reseat the heatsink? I'm honestly no good with this - this is my first PC I built and I bought the Noctua D14 as it was supposed to be the best air cooler out there. But the temps seem to be really disappointing. Airflow can't be a problem as temps were cool for a whole week at 30-32.
Cores being hotter or cooler is very common. It could be caused by how the thermal paste settles, how the heatsink sits, or even be an issue with the CPU itself (usually just the sensor). It's not really worth being concerned about, just make sure you go by the highest temp to be safe.-viper- said:I don't think you understand me - previously on CPU-Z it was 3300Mhz. Idle temps were around 29, 29, 33, 27.
Now It's 1600Mhz and idle temps are: 35, 34, 38, 31. Load temps at 3.7Ghz = 54C.
Why did it shoot up? Also one core seems to be hotter. Should I reseat the heatsink? I'm honestly no good with this - this is my first PC I built and I bought the Noctua D14 as it was supposed to be the best air cooler out there. But the temps seem to be really disappointing. Airflow can't be a problem as temps were cool for a whole week at 30-32.
8800 or a more recent equivalent is generally the recommended Physx card. I'm not sure you would see a huge improvement over a 8600GT though. Chances are your 5850 is limiting you there, I might be mistaken but I think Batman was kind of gimped on AMD/ATI cards.hlhbk said:Would a 8800 GTX as a dedicated physx card for a ATI 5850 make a big difference? I want to be able to run Batman on high physx for instance but can only get medium out of a 8600 GT.
chaosblade said:Cores being hotter or cooler is very common. It could be caused by how the thermal paste settles, how the heatsink sits, or even be an issue with the CPU itself (usually just the sensor). It's not really worth being concerned about, just make sure you go by the highest temp to be safe.
And mike23 is right, idle temps are generally meaningless outside of troubleshooting. Temps are only important so you don't cook your parts, and you'll obviously never run hotter idle than during load.
8800 or a more recent equivalent is generally the recommended Physx card. I'm not sure you would see a huge improvement over a 8600GT though. Chances are your 5850 is limiting you there, I might be mistaken but I think Batman was kind of gimped on AMD/ATI cards.
hlhbk said:Actually I am able to run Batman at its highest settings with everything on its highest with medium physx on my 5850/8600 GT setup between 50-60 FPS. Now I am confused though, I was told last page that my card is still good and that I shouldn't upgrade until the next gen of cards come out, and now I am being told my 5850 is holding me back. Which one is it?
f0rk said:Got my new computer working, but it doesn't see the internet cable plugged in the back. Windows says no connections available. There's a green light and a slowly blinking orange one around the port. Its a Asus p8p67 pro motherboard
Whoops, no I haven't, thanks. Although I'm reminded why I thought it wasn't required when it asks to install Norton as soon as you put it inRS4- said:Did you install the network drivers? It should be on the disk.
f0rk said:Whoops, no I haven't, thanks. Although I'm reminded why I thought it wasn't required when it asks to install Norton as soon as you put it in
Corky said:Batman is several years old (two?).
BF3 and Crysis 2 aren't.
Depends on which game you're taking into consideration.
hlhbk said:Ok in my current setup I am getting 30 FPS on extreme at 1920x1200 in crysis 2 with the DX 11 features turned on.
I can run most new games at a pretty great clip (I get anywhere between 30-50 FPS in the Witcher 2 with everything on except uber sampling). I can get 60 FPS in alice madness returns with Physx low. I am mainly wanting to make sure I got what I need for Skyrim and Arkham City.
Wallach said:To be honest anything that is going to come out on a console you're going to be fine with that setup.
Those are not mutually exclusive concepts. Your 5850 is the bottleneck, but the performance gain to a 570 will not be significant. Likely the upgrade that would get you the best bang for your buck is a 580. This is why I said wait until the next gen, unless you have a lot of disposable income.hlhbk said:Actually I am able to run Batman at its highest settings with everything on its highest with medium physx on my 5850/8600 GT setup between 50-60 FPS. Now I am confused though, I was told last page that my card is still good and that I shouldn't upgrade until the next gen of cards come out, and now I am being told my 5850 is holding me back. Which one is it?
RS4- said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IelMo1fqL00&feature=player_embedded
A look at upcoming Noctua coolers.
hlhbk said:Ok in my current setup I am getting 30 FPS on extreme at 1920x1200 in crysis 2 with the DX 11 features turned on.
I can run most new games at a pretty great clip (I get anywhere between 30-50 FPS in the Witcher 2 with everything on except uber sampling). I can get 60 FPS in alice madness returns with Physx low. I am mainly wanting to make sure I got what I need for Skyrim and Arkham City.
Ezahn said:Some of you using nVidia 3D Vision?
I usually don't like 3D (in movies, as is) but when the new rig arrives I'm tempted to try it since I have a 23'' LG 120 Hz monitor...
Now there are also the cheaper, wired glasses...