XiaNaphryz said:If you're worried about future-proofing, you may want to go with a Z68 board and i7 2600K instead. Since you don't have a SSD in your build, the Z68 will let you use a cheaper small SSD as a cache drive, and the i7 has HT which will give you more threads than the i5. Not much use for that now games-wise, but in a couple years it can give you a performance boost if more games start taking advantage of more threads.
Civ V benefits from as many cores as possible. More games coming out in the future will, and it looks like BF3 will as well if that's important to you. But, 4 cores is still quite a bit, and threads are not the same thing as more cores, despite what intel marketing wants people to think. Stick with the 2500K.MadraptorMan said:Is using an SSD for cache really that important? I thought about it but I can't quite get my head around how it would be beneficial for gaming, though the idea is tempting. The other feature of the Z68 is on-board graphics implementation, as far as I can tell, and I certainly don't want to pay extra for something I don't need. As far as the i7 with hyperthreading...if I knew that games will take advantage of that in the future I would jump on it, but is anyone sure of it?
MadraptorMan said:Is using an SSD for cache really that important? I thought about it but I can't quite get my head around how it would be beneficial for gaming, though the idea is tempting. The other feature of the Z68 is on-board graphics implementation, as far as I can tell, and I certainly don't want to pay extra for something I don't need. As far as the i7 with hyperthreading...if I knew that games will take advantage of that in the future I would jump on it, but is anyone sure of it?
Do you ever do any video editing/encoding? That would also benefit from the Z68 (the on-board GPU helps speed up encode jobs if you're using a video card) and the extra threads.MadraptorMan said:Is using an SSD for cache really that important? I thought about it but I can't quite get my head around how it would be beneficial for gaming, though the idea is tempting. The other feature of the Z68 is on-board graphics implementation, as far as I can tell, and I certainly don't want to pay extra for something I don't need. As far as the i7 with hyperthreading...if I knew that games will take advantage of that in the future I would jump on it, but is anyone sure of it?
Extra threads do make quite a bit of difference even if it's on the same core, but the application needs to take proper advantage of them. I see it all the time here in the workplace, but our work is much more high-end obviously. Games are still behind in this area though.mkenyon said:Civ V benefits from as many cores as possible. More games coming out in the future will, and it looks like BF3 will as well if that's important to you. But, 4 cores is still quite a bit, and threads are not the same thing as more cores, despite what intel marketing wants people to think. Stick with the 2500K.
MadraptorMan said:Man you guys are making me want a SSD. I think instead of the Z68 route I am gonna try for a smaller SD for the OS and the 500GB drive for everything else. That sounds good, right? I suppose it won't have a huge benefit for actual gaming since the games will still be on a platter, though, if I understand things correctly.
Stock .Kyaw said:Is it the stock 5850 or does it have custom coolers on it?
5850 is a tiny bit better than the 6850 at completely stock.
What should I get instead then ?mkenyon said:5850 will outperform a 6850, but you won't see much of an improvement from either when you are upgrading from a 4850.
JaseC said:Steam Mover/Steam Tool is what you're after. You'll need to be running WinVista/7.
Edit: Beaten like an egg.
Depends on your budget and what you want out of it. A 6950 or 560Ti would be a good upgrade for you. If you want to spend less than that, you might want to wait until the 7xxx/6xx cards are out.Moundir&Tony>you said:Stock .
What should I get instead then ?
With newer drivers the 6850 should be on par with a 5850, if not slightly ahead. A 6850 should be atleast a 50% improvement over a 4850 and they can be had for 150-160.Moundir&Tony>you said:Stock .
What should I get instead then ?
Is that any time soon? I'm planning out my build and the price of the 560 is a bit off putting. If it's going to drop in the next month or so, then I'll wait it out.mkenyon said:Depends on your budget and what you want out of it. A 6950 or 560Ti would be a good upgrade for you. If you want to spend less than that, you might want to wait until the 7xxx/6xx cards are out.
Moundir&Tony>you said:I can't put more than 150 in my new card . That's why I wanted help choosing between the 5850 (120) and a 6850 (130) .
Moundir&Tony>you said:I'd post a link to a shop , but it's in french so ... and I'm not sure which one I'm going to order from .
Apparently , I can get a 460 for ~150 . Dunno . I won't have to change my motherboard , will I ? (stupid question , I know , but until now I've always stuck with the same brand for each of my motherboards)
That's odd. I just bought an msi 6970 earlier and it came with 2 xfire connectorssquicken said:What the hell? I picked up a couple MSI cards for Crossfire, and the interconnect(s) are sold separately? Why cheap out like that? At least make it clear in product listing
I'll probably get a new processor at the end of the year . Don't think I'm gonna need to change anything else .Horsemama1956 said:No, you won't have to change your motherboard.
For the prices listed you can't go wrong with the 6850. Any plans on upgrading the rest of your system in the near future?
Epix said:I like skipping a generation CPU/GPU wise with my builds. Helps to spread the cost out somewhat as well.
I'm targeting a Nobember-ish timeframe but I was hoping at Ivy Bridge and Kepler being available at that point. Doesn't look like that's happening.
See my post above. You're safe to build now though, not much (if anything) is going to push current CPUs to the limits in gaming.JetBlackPanda said:I am getting anxious to build a new gaming machine, nothing to expensive, maybe $800 max for now.
should I wait until around November?? or should I go for it now, is there anything coming out that I would benefit from in the fall?
mkenyon said:Bulldozer should be, by accounts I've read, it's gonna be a killer proc. Some guys have been hitting 5.3ghz on air.
Yeah but you have to tell people that you read this on the Extreme OC websites where it's just for 5 minutes at a time and they don't mind if their CPU dies as much.mkenyon said:Bulldozer should be, by accounts I've read, it's gonna be a killer proc. Some guys have been hitting 5.3ghz on air.
You don't get to CPU killing voltages on air. And it was on Hard OCP.... because that's so very differentHazaro said:Yeah but you have to tell people that you read this on the Extreme OC websites where it's just for 5 minutes at a time and they don't mind if their CPU dies as much.
You get to CPU killing voltages FASTER on airmkenyon said:You don't get to CPU killing voltages on air. And it was on Hard OCP.... because that's so very different![]()
I feel your pain a bit as one of my next builds has long been penciled in at 22nm+28nm, but by most accounts, Ivy Bridge was never scheduled for that time frame. You may be thinking of Sandy Bridge-E (-E_). Speaking of which...Epix said:I like skipping a generation CPU/GPU wise with my builds. Helps to spread the cost out somewhat as well.
I'm targeting a Nobember-ish timeframe but I was hoping at Ivy Bridge and Kepler being available at that point. Doesn't look like that's happening.
mike23 said:White R3 is the sexiest case around.
You're build is a lot like mine. Just a different heatsink and mobo. Plus I'm rocking 16gb of ram now, heh.
![]()
Tallshortman said:All you need is a new GPU. Everything else is fine for gaming, as in you won't be bottlenecked. I have an older Phenom and I have yet to be bottlenecked by it. If anything spend that money on a high end GPU and maybe extra memory if your mobo can fit more. Also, definitely upgrade to windows 7. Even on the new vistas SP I felt a huge speed increase with windows 7.
However, if you do upgrade to a high end card you may need to upgrade your PSU. Be sure to check what the minimum wattage is required by the card you choose and I would make sure it doesn't cut too close to the 550W PSU you have.
As quickly as they've grown in the last few years, Fractal's still very small. Newegg and NCIX are the only official North American distributors. Newegg has a shipment of FD Arcs coming in any day/week now (not all of their service people are aware of that), and they should be getting more Defines in somewhere around then. I'd keep checking their site for updates to the FD subcategory over the next 1-3 weeks.Kadey said:Anybody know where I can get one of those Fractal cases? I know Newegg isn't selling them anymore and it appears the only other store that has it is in Canada. For something so popular, you'd figure there would be more of them widespread.
No worries, your PSU is fine for that setup with the new GPU.Lemonte said:Ok, I think I'm going to upgrade just graphics card and OS for now because I just noticed that my mobo doesn't support ddr3 ram -.- and when I have more money, maybe later this year, I'll upgrade mobo, cpu and ram... and probably psu too.
So I was thinking of buying this graphics card:
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/AMD_Series/EAH6950_DCII2DI4S2GD5/#specifications
but can't find anywhere how much does it require from psu. Other 6950 cards require minimum of 500w but isn't this one over clocked? so does it require more than that. Or is there any better card choice in this price range?
link to my current setup
Same voltage, modest OC usually adds like 10-20W. Your VX550 will be quite fine.Lemonte said:Ok, I think I'm going to upgrade just graphics card and OS for now because I just noticed that my mobo doesn't support ddr3 ram -.- and when I have more money, maybe later this year, I'll upgrade mobo, cpu and ram... and probably psu too.
So I was thinking of buying this graphics card:
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/AMD_Series/EAH6950_DCII2DI4S2GD5/#specifications
but can't find anywhere how much does it require from psu. Other 6950 cards require minimum of 500w but isn't this one over clocked? so does it require more than that. Or is there any better card choice in this price range?
link to my current setup
Sub in a 2500K to overclock. It is fairly simple and you get a nice speed boost out of it.Ryan_ said:Basic Desktop Questions:
Your Current Specs: 2.5 year old PC gaming rig I buuilt myself (Core 2 Duo E8500 + GTX 270)
Budget: about 900 euros
Main Use: Gaming, general usage, maybe some emulation
Monitor Resolution: 1080p, got a Syncmaster BX2431
List SPECIFIC games that you MUST be able to play: All the games that come out in the next 2 years or something (including but not limited to Bioshock Infinite, Deus Ex, BF3, Skyrim, ...)
Are reusing any parts?: No.
When will you build?: In 3 weeks.
Will you be overclocking?: Dont know. Never done it but I'm kinda thinking about it, if I find a good guide.
Current build list:
![]()
Any ideas are welcome! The SSD is a 60 Gb for Windows 7 and frequently used programs.
Hazaro said:Sub in a 2500K to overclock. It is fairly simple and you get a nice speed boost out of it.
Looks great to me, read up some some Vertex 2 info, I'm not sure on their current reliability.
Kadey said:Anybody know where I can get one of those Fractal cases? I know Newegg isn't selling them anymore and it appears the only other store that has it is in Canada. For something so popular, you'd figure there would be more of them widespread.
Phenom II X6 1100T?Ayo said:Quick question, what would be the AMD "equivalent" to an i7 2600k?
Crucial M4.Ryan_ said:Any other ideas for a cheap but solid 60 Gb SSD?
You need the K version to overclock. That 550W is more than enough.Ryan_ said:Cheers for the fast response ;-)
I was considering the 2500k but didn't really know if it was worth it. If I overclock, is a 550 XFX PSU enough to hold it all together?
Any other ideas for a cheap but solid 60 Gb SSD?
Right now? Nothing.Ayo said:Quick question, what would be the AMD "equivalent" to an i7 2600k?
The closest thing would be in the range of a highly overclocked Phenom II 955/965/970/1100T or so. You can throw the 980 in there as well, but theses are all very rough "equivalents."Ayo said:Quick question, what would be the AMD "equivalent" to an i7 2600k?
If you don't mind going with a last gen SATA 2 drive, 64GB C300s can be had for $122 on Amazon. Of the current crop of SSDs, the Crucial M4s have so far seemed to be one of the most reliable, if not exactly the outright fastest.Ryan_ said:Cheers for the fast response ;-)
I was considering the 2500k but didn't really know if it was worth it. If I overclock, is a 550 XFX PSU enough to hold it all together?
Any other ideas for a cheap but solid 60 Gb SSD?
Since I'm waiting to build in October do you think it'd be worth? I just want a rig that I would not have to upgrade for a long while, and I'm not particularly strict on who manufacturs the CPU.Hazaro said:You need the K version to overclock. That 550W is more than enough.
My only other suggestion would be the new Micron M4 drives, but I haven't read extensively into them.
Right now? Nothing.
In 1-2 months Bulldozer should have a comparable chip out.
No one knows how fast, cheap, efficient, or upgradeable AM3+ is going to be.Ayo said:Since I'm waiting to build in October do you think it'd be worth? I just want a rig that I would not have to upgrade for a long while, and I'm not particularly strict on who manufacturs the CPU.
Dina said:
mike23 said: