You are all saints.
Go away.
You are all saints.
Me too. But I guess it's all fun and games. I am 100% sure that sooner or later these Kickstarter shanigans are going to backfire. This is the Schafer did it and so can we-phase, then it's the ransom-phase and eventually people will just get tired of it, I guess.
Kickstart a PS3 patch?You are all saints.
You are all saints.
Similar to Double Fine, Idle Thumbs has a fantastic mix of a good product, endearing personalities, and a dose of humbleness. It loosens the purse strings fairly easily.Damn. I mean, I knew that they're well liked, but it's not often you get to see internet popularity translate into people paying out real money.
Mixed feelings. On one hand a well-produced podcast is a valuable commodity, but seems weird to panhandle for it.
I'll donate ten bucks.
You are all saints.
I think many of us have gotten spoiled with the "everything is free on the internet" mentality of last decade or so.
Congrats Nick.You are all saints.
Hope that clears it up a bit. Anyway, I can't thank you guys enough for your support! This has been in the works for months and months and it's crazy to see it pan out like this.
Why is weird to ask for support? The bandwidth costs of podcasts are fairly substantial after all.
I think many of us have gotten spoiled with the "everything is free on the internet" mentality of last decade or so.
If we want good online content, we're going to have to be willing to support it.
I don't get how people feel weird about paying. It obviously costs money to make the podcast, so they can recoup that money through donations or advertisement. I'm more than willing to pay for my entertainment.
Thanks Chris I'll add it to the OPHoly goddamn shit. This is working far better than expected.
One thing to clarify for folks who (understandably) don't get why we're asking for this much money: We're doing pretty complicated, high quality rewards. It means no matter how many rewards we have to make, we still have to do full minimum print runs of a bunch of t-shirts, vinyl records, high quality art prints, etc., etc.. Even if only one person bought each of those things (which fortunately isn't the case), we'd still have to order a whole bunch of them just for that one guy. A lot of Kickstarters for projects similar to ours have much more straightforward rewards. We chose to do something a bit more complex, which means we need to reach a higher minimum to break even, and then to have a decent amount of money left over to do other fairly expensive things like rent an office, and so on.
Hope that clears it up a bit. Anyway, I can't thank you guys enough for your support! This has been in the works for months and months and it's crazy to see it pan out like this.
Yeah those where general 1up network ads but they those are ads to!Heck even GFW had ads if I'm not mistaken.
Mixed feelings. On one hand a well-produced podcast is a valuable commodity, but seems weird to panhandle for it.
I'll donate ten bucks.
I thought the beggar paid a set fee up front.
Me too. But I guess it's all fun and games. I am 100% sure that sooner or later these Kickstarter shanigans are going to backfire. This is the Schafer did it and so can we-phase, then it's the ransom-phase and eventually people will just get tired of it, I guess.
Mixed feelings. On one hand a well-produced podcast is a valuable commodity, but seems weird to panhandle for it.
I'll donate ten bucks.
Holy goddamn shit. This is working far better than expected.
One thing to clarify for folks who (understandably) don't get why we're asking for this much money: We're doing pretty complicated, high quality rewards. It means no matter how many rewards we have to make, we still have to do full minimum print runs of a bunch of t-shirts, vinyl records, high quality art prints, etc., etc.. Even if only one person bought each of those things (which fortunately isn't the case), we'd still have to order a whole bunch of them just for that one guy. A lot of Kickstarters for projects similar to ours have much more straightforward rewards. We chose to do something a bit more complex, which means we need to reach a higher minimum to break even, and then to have a decent amount of money left over to do other fairly expensive things like rent an office, and so on.
Hope that clears it up a bit. Anyway, I can't thank you guys enough for your support! This has been in the works for months and months and it's crazy to see it pan out like this.
This is going to soar past 30k in no time.
Has this made it onto reddit at all? If I remember correctly, that's really when the Doublefine kickstarter exploded.
Are there Kickstarter horror stories that I'm not aware of? I'm trying to understand why anyone would oppose this. I mean, it gives people who want something the opportunity to pay for it and have it when it might not otherwise exist. What's the downside?
True. I guess my distinction is whether I feel the content is valuable, well-produced, which Idle Thumbs clearly is.
http://www.reddit.com/search?q=idle+thumbsHas this made it onto reddit at all? If I remember correctly, that's really when the Doublefine kickstarter exploded.
Not saying that these scenarios apply to this, but I've heard about one thing.
"Let's do this...and see if we can get some extra cash, even though we're about to do it anyway. Just don't tell anyone we were going to do this anyway."
Or there was a particular group who had come reasonably close to their goal, but was not going to hit it - so they had their own guy throw $1k at it to break the barrier so they'd still get the money.
That's certainly against the rules, but I don't see anything in place stopping that sort of thing.
I don't see a problem with either of those scenarios. I would never fund any project in which the lead didn't have some skin in the game.
Why is weird to ask for support? The bandwidth costs of podcasts are fairly substantial after all.
I think many of us have gotten spoiled with the "everything is free on the internet" mentality of last decade or so.
If we want good online content, we're going to have to be willing to support it.
Would any of you mind explaining to me why you see this as begging/panhandling and not something morally neutral, like "securing funding."
Sigh, I'm too emotionally involved in this. I'm starting to think I'm even more nervous than Idle Thumbs guys themselves.
Going to sit here and F5 this thread entire march.
So this is what being a sports fan is like?
The way I see it, you get the satisfaction of backing something you really enjoy, a small amount of cash ($30) in return for a whole lot of entertainment.
Well the thing is, if you don't hit your goal, people get their money back as it didn't hit the goal. If you push a little cash at it (and are just going for a cash grab) this ensures that they get that money.
Sigh, I'm too emotionally involved in this. I'm starting to think I'm even more nervous than Idle Thumbs guys themselves.
Going to sit here and F5 this thread entire march.
So this is what being a sports fan is like?
Or there was a particular group who had come reasonably close to their goal, but was not going to hit it - so they had their own guy throw $1k at it to break the barrier so they'd still get the money.
That's certainly against the rules, but I don't see anything in place stopping that sort of thing.
You are all saints.