...what does that make Bush?
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...ticles/2004/09/04/why_exclude_a_muslim_voice/
Half the battle is destroying the ideology of "Islamic Terrorism". Here in this case, you have a Western born Muslim who has worldwide credibility, who's wrote hundreds of books and given thousands of lectures, many of which are on the topic of terrorism and how it's incompatible with Islam, yet he's not allowed to enter the States to speak at the largest Muslim convention ever held in the Western Hemisphere.
According to Ashcroft and friends it's due to "recent information" that cannot be disclosed. It was made apparent by others that this was a result of lobbying by Jewish Extremists, and this action is a pre-election political move by the Bush Administration.
This is one of many examples showing us that Bush is not serious about ridding the world of terrorism. It's also proof of how phony the domestic efforts to arrest and prevent the incoming of terrorists, are.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...ticles/2004/09/04/why_exclude_a_muslim_voice/
Half the battle is destroying the ideology of "Islamic Terrorism". Here in this case, you have a Western born Muslim who has worldwide credibility, who's wrote hundreds of books and given thousands of lectures, many of which are on the topic of terrorism and how it's incompatible with Islam, yet he's not allowed to enter the States to speak at the largest Muslim convention ever held in the Western Hemisphere.
According to Ashcroft and friends it's due to "recent information" that cannot be disclosed. It was made apparent by others that this was a result of lobbying by Jewish Extremists, and this action is a pre-election political move by the Bush Administration.
This is one of many examples showing us that Bush is not serious about ridding the world of terrorism. It's also proof of how phony the domestic efforts to arrest and prevent the incoming of terrorists, are.