Tschumi
Member
This is a thought exercise. I would rather we not even list specific circumstances, and if we do we certainly don't argue about them, I am just zero'ing in on this:
- Humanity got a lot of help, now look where we are.
- Would it have been better if we had not been so successful?
- Or do you think reversing a tragedy of the past would have helped us end up somewhere other than here?
Premise: I'm implying that at the moment we're not in a particularly good place: overpopulated; corrupting our environment on all conceivable fronts; going through iterative financial and social cycles; pretty bleak.
So, with that brief elucidation, the question is:
If you could reverse one event in history, would it be a good thing or a bad thing?
*you can go as far back in time as you want, try to talk in broad strokes, politics are off-limits as always, please don't say "I'd flip so-and-so election" or any crap like that.
In my opinion, I would reverse a technological development, a 'good' development/success/discovery, or reverse a decision that pointed us towards one or all of the heavy industries that pollute the earth today. I think a lot of the technological advances of the 17- and 1800s have allowed our population to multiply, but also our pollution footprint. I'd hope to reverse the decision towards fossil fuel-powered industry and have the world follow more sustainable practices instead. I don't particularly think it'd solve anything or stick. Just my empty thought.
- Humanity got a lot of help, now look where we are.
- Would it have been better if we had not been so successful?
- Or do you think reversing a tragedy of the past would have helped us end up somewhere other than here?
Premise: I'm implying that at the moment we're not in a particularly good place: overpopulated; corrupting our environment on all conceivable fronts; going through iterative financial and social cycles; pretty bleak.
So, with that brief elucidation, the question is:
If you could reverse one event in history, would it be a good thing or a bad thing?
*you can go as far back in time as you want, try to talk in broad strokes, politics are off-limits as always, please don't say "I'd flip so-and-so election" or any crap like that.
In my opinion, I would reverse a technological development, a 'good' development/success/discovery, or reverse a decision that pointed us towards one or all of the heavy industries that pollute the earth today. I think a lot of the technological advances of the 17- and 1800s have allowed our population to multiply, but also our pollution footprint. I'd hope to reverse the decision towards fossil fuel-powered industry and have the world follow more sustainable practices instead. I don't particularly think it'd solve anything or stick. Just my empty thought.
Last edited: