HEY, I HEAR PSP ISN'T GETTING A POKEMON GAME...EVER! I DUNNO, THOUGH. JUST MAKING CONVERSATIONSpeevy said:No DS thread without a PSP reference.
No PSP thread with a DS reference.
GAF rocks.
i agree with this tag (IAWTT) ;Psnapty00
nothing useful to say. ever.
no ... don't team up with Square to create anything other than turn based RPG .. their action RPG is decent at best.Cruel Bastard Mario said:Hell, I've always wanted Nintendo to team up with Square and make a MMORPG involving the Zelda universe. If I had my way, it would be called Hyrule Fantasy.
Cruel Bastard Mario said:Oh, and the day this happens is the day Nintendo fans take over the Online/Matchup forum![]()
The free portion is all I care about.Deku said:I believe Kobun mentioned some time ago March/April is the fiscal year end for many companies and games get throw at March for some reason. Maybe the faint hope that they can get it out by then and to bad the current fiscal year's planned releases.
That said, I think DS on-line would be doable and likely if we think in terms of Battle.net set-up. Knowing Nintendo, always being frugal and practical to a fault, what can be expected is probably just a matchmaking server and maybe some simple options.
And I think a lot of the games that have on-line features will offer them for free.
Amir0x said:When did the PSP begin to "steadily outsell the DS"? If by "steadily" you mean "outsell the DS for one week", I agree.
Also, online Pokmeon would be the absolute only thing that could make me go back and buy a Pokemon game. I so hope it's that... oh please be something awesome... MMORPG Pokemon PLZ
duderon said:I wasn't making myself clear enough. I was referring to the post where lockii said he was sick of hearing about a "DS backlash" where everyone would sell their DS and buy a PSP. I was just saying that i believe the DS will be steadily outsold on a weekly/monthly basis unless Nintendo can pull something out of their ass (which in this case looks to be a BIG something).
DarthWufei said:Eh, I've commented on this before quite a few times before, but I get the feeling that I'm the only one who really thinks online Pokemon or a Pokemon MMORPG would be a bad idea. Hell, a Pokemon MMORPG may not be an easy road to success as many people seem to think. It could easily be the first true RPG flop of the series.
I understand how it would be fun and great, but that's not how I'm looking at it all. First off, this is a game for children, children under the age of 12 mainly, I can't see many parents letting their kids sign up for an online game where they have contacts with many people they don't know. Do you trust a little kid to be mindful about who he's playing with in such a game?Amir0x said:I don't know why you think it's a bad idea. It's practically like the whole concept was made with MMORPGs in mind. It's an extremely player-driven customizable (as far as your fighting monster teams go) game where you challenge OTHER people to battles! I mean, that's practically the definition of PvP right there.
But imagine it on larger terms. Multiple classes - PokePhotographer, PokeScientist, PokemonTrainer, PokemonGymLeader, WaterPokemonMaster, FirePokemonMaster, PsiPokemonMaster, GrassPokemonMaster, RockPokemonMaster, etc...
Imagine Ragnarok Online type costume customization on top of that, and All 300+ Pokemon available to be captured and tamed for use in battling your way to the top.
I see nothing but good from such a concept![]()
Cruel Bastard Mario said:Maybe we'll finally see what that AOL/Pokemon deal was about from a year or so ago...
(was that even confirmed?)
chances are he's talking about this.Blackbird said:Was that based on the photo taken during the building up of the Nintendo area just before E3? A photo on which you could see various boxes holding the AOL logo?
MMBN would make for an awesome online game and given the basic premise of the series, there's a lot the creators could do with. Hell I'd rather buy a version of MMBN that included a chat function kind of like how PSO lobbies work, than a firmware update, You could create your own Navi and just chat with people online in the MMBN world. You can still draw and whatnot like pictochat, type too, perhaps even voice chat. Hell they could just plain take the entire game online if the wanted.nubbe said:Capcom needs to release MMBN with online capability and a slot gate with battle chips.
It would also have a voice recognition feature so you must scream the chips name when you insert them or they won't work!
Coolest thing ever.
duderon said:I'm sure you've seen the japanese weekly sales, but not even counting that, in a couple of months when consumers see the two portables side by side there will be no comparison.
Johnny Nighttrain said:for those of you guys with the "i'll believe it when i see it" stance, well, it'll happen in march at the latest. so i wouldn't worry about it. not gonna happen with Mario Kart though. that's not gonna get released til sept from what i've been hearing. my bets are on Jump Superstars, or Advance Wars being one of the first online games. aside from what Square has in the works.
Capcom is gonna have a little shindig next week. hopefully they blow us all away and bust out online Street Fighter DS. that would be god like. oh well, we'll more than likely see their DS line up finally.
This point is already mute. My 10 year old brother is having loads of fun playing WoW. Of course he isn't a generalization and neither is my mother, but he also sits down for hours on end and plays Pokemon. I don't see why this is such a huge issue.DarthWufei said:I understand how it would be fun and great, but that's not how I'm looking at it all. First off, this is a game for children, children under the age of 12 mainly, I can't see many parents letting their kids sign up for an online game where they have contacts with many people they don't know. Do you trust a little kid to be mindful about who he's playing with in such a game?
I see more kids these days spending more time online and making more friends in the process, whether through chat programs or online games, compared to say them going outside after school for hours like I used to a decade ago. It does limit the personalisation process by limiting it online but it does not restrict the fact that you can be personal online as well.DarthWufei said:They mentioned looking into it, but again stressed the communication tool as one of the main principles of the game. Going online adds news ways to communicate yes, but it offers a server lack of interaction I feel kids should have.
When hasn't a Nintendo product, software or hardware, been extremely hard or complex to set up? They have stressed numerous times the issue of free subscription vs. payment subscription for online games. Personally I see them pumping out a payment simply because it means more $$$, but again this could be wrong regarding their usual comments lately.DarthWufei said:Lastly there's just the fact that it's simply going to have to be free or low cost, easy to set up, and very simple to use.
Shikamaru Ninja said:I am thinking Metroid Prime Hunters is definitely going to be the big game to do it. It's the biggest American killer app from Nintendo announced for the DS. Mario Kart and Animal Crossing will follow shortly after.
Evidently Capcom, Konami, Square Enix and Nintendo will all be making DS announcements within the next 2 months. Nintendo must be rounding up support to try and counter the inevitable PSP hype train this March. I bet we'll see some major Sega Sammy, Bandai, EA, Namco, Activision, THQ and UbiSoft announcements too.Bluemercury said:So which company will have an announcement now?Konami? Capcom? and now Nintendo in March? where did you saw these?im confused.....
duderon said:I'm sure you've seen the japanese weekly sales, but not even counting that, in a couple of months when consumers see the two portables side by side there will be no comparison.
Just like Pokemon.Lemurnator said:ONLINE GAMING IS A FAD.
shinokou said:Animal Crossing and Phantasy Star Online, online for DS.
I'm not getting my hopes up.
But I'm getting my hopes up anyway.
(Ah, the life of a Nintendo console owner...)
Is that so? That's pretty cool actually, I guess I'm simply not giving kids the credit their due. But I still can't see the same being said if we go down to a younger group. i also kind of don't feel you're going to find many predators and similar young kids in a game like WoW, people usually know grom the get go that such games will basically draw in crowds of teens and young adults. Pokemon is another matter, it's shown off as a kids game, and it's thought of as a kid's game. This could attract the wrong crowd. Maybe I'm just over worrisome, but the chance of something happening to my kid, however small, would still bother me. I guess it would be up to the parents to keep a closer watch on what the kid's doing and whatnot, and it would make sense if they're spending for such a game.speedpop said:This point is already mute. My 10 year old brother is having loads of fun playing WoW. Of course he isn't a generalization and neither is my mother, but he also sits down for hours on end and plays Pokemon. I don't see why this is such a huge issue.
This is definitely true, and I agree it does offer new ways to communicate for kids. I guess I just can't see how it can be as rewarding to mental and physical development as playing with those friends at school, outside in the fresh air. I guess for that matter it's more likely for something to happen to a kid outside than on an online game, perhaps the threat just seems more existent in a closed circle rather than a large world.I see more kids these days spending more time online and making more friends in the process, whether through chat programs or online games, compared to say them going outside after school for hours like I used to a decade ago. It does limit the personalisation process by limiting it online but it does not restrict the fact that you can be personal online as well.
Well of course, but when has Nintendo ever had an online product the went over well? I'm not sure how that Pokemon Mobile Adapter stuff went over in Japan, but I would have liked to see how it would have went over here in the US. Regardless I think that online is a new territory, perhaps I'm just prudent as I mentioned previously, but it has to implemented in the easiest way for a game like Pokemon.When hasn't a Nintendo product, software or hardware, been extremely hard or complex to set up? They have stressed numerous times the issue of free subscription vs. payment subscription for online games. Personally I see them pumping out a payment simply because it means more $$$, but again this could be wrong regarding their usual comments lately.
You're quite right. I definitely don't want the idea of Pokemon online to be thrown out completely. I think it's something Nintendo could do if they really planned on it. I mean it can be done, and I have little doubt Nintendo could do it right, it just would take a lot of work to have it stand out, and be a rewarding experience. Pokemon is probably one of the hardest franchises to get online of Nintendo's franchises. But done right, it could easily bring a huge breath of fresh air to the series.You did raise a very valid argument and I am sure if Nintendo do have the mindset that yes, the majority of Pokemon enthusiasts are children, then of course they have to take everything into account if it indeed goes online.
People are speculating that Nintendo would also release some kind of wireless USB dongle that would let you make any internet-enabled computer a hub to get your DS online. Is that possible?
It seems believable...