Support NeoGAF

[Gunstar77]

Ratings: Description:
out of 10 click here for ratings guide

6.5 Presentation
Excessive load times and limited options are no longer acceptable.

7.5 Graphics
A good looking game with smudges and smears. If only the levels played a little longer between loads.

6.0 Sound
Certain members of the Ghost unit sound like small children while the effects are misplaced or muted.

6.0 Gameplay
Plain toast.

5.0 Lasting Appeal
Theoretically things could improve, but theoretical wishing is just that.

6.0 OVERALL:
(out of 10 / not an average)

http://ps2.ign.com/articles/569/569793p1.html

Ouch, the Xbox got an 8.8

http://xbox.ign.com/articles/566/566498p1.html

 

[cvxfreak]

Isn't GR2 essentially GR1.5?

 

[Defensor]

SOCOM II killa this is not ;-)

 

[Kabuki Waq]

xbox version rocks so much tho.

 

[Mike Works]

I've only played it for about 20 minutes, but the graphics are a huge leap from the original (XB version), and if the online play is as solid as I think it is, it looks like a quality game.

PS2 version I can't speak for.

 

[kumanoki]

Certain members of the Ghost unit sound like small children while the effects are misplaced or muted.

This game would get a straight up 10 if there were small children in your unit.

 

[Kabuki Waq]

The live play is really fucking tough, go around memorzing the huge maps before you come online. I get rocked all the time because i get lost routinely in big maps. :lol

but fuck the atmosphere online when you are hiding in grass sniping someone is amazing.

 

[Wario64]

Isn't GR2 essentially GR1.5?

Yeah, it's a prequel to Ghost Recon 2 Xbox

 

[Spider_Jerusalem]

Isn't GR2 essentially GR1.5?

In the Xbox version it's very different from the first GR (team management, gfx, lone wolf mode, etc.), so I wouldn't really call it an 1.5 version. Don't know about the PS2 version, but I thought it had the same enhanchements, even if the game's story is different.