LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
Hip hop hooray
Put it in the dedicated gamepass thread then
It's not 75-80atomic heart is genuienly a fun game. dunno why it scores so bad. or maybe it scores normal and we lost the definition of normal. 75 80 shouldnt be bad but industry portrasy them as. maybe thats the problem
"The detractors of Xbox Game Pass are running out of goalposts to move."
It's not 75-80
Morelike 70-75
Oh give me a fucking break with this line. What goalposts? At the time these comments were being made, there was absolutely a dearth of first party or strong content on XGP. That this is now going to be cleared up - largely driven through acquisitions - doesn't change history.
The media is playing Twitter and the warriors are playing Metacritic. The rest of us are just out here trying to play games.Weird to start out his article with such a bitter warrior line. Game media is spending way too much time on twitter.
While you’re waiting, the rest of us are enjoying the day 1 releases on game pass.Hey look, after last Friday's Phil Spencer thread the bingo came up with your usual 'Game Pass is the GOAT'.
If you buy it Day 1 at full price that is. Which people almost never do. The game will be on sale in 8 weeks.
Me while playing atomic heart on game pass
then hifi rush and wolong
Starfield end of June? What?
I have enough to play for the next 5 years. Work and family and other hobbies apart from gaming do that to you.While you’re waiting, the rest of us are enjoying the day 1 releases on game pass.
Cool story guy. Then I’m not sure what you’re waiting for, if not the great selection that game pass offers on a monthly basis. But you do you buddy. Meanwhile, I’m gonna enjoy Atomic Heart, friend.I have enough to play for the next 5 years. Work and family and other hobbies apart from gaming do that to you.
Ok scores, but not good enough apparently.PS5 71
XSX 73
PC 77
Those a good scores regardless.
Ok scores, but not good enough apparently.
To exist in the upper pantheon of gaming, where the real games are.Not good enough for what?
Isn't it obvious, for the guy I replied to.Not good enough for what?
Isn't it obvious, for the guy I replied to.
Considering the need to round up.
One of those periods where you struggle to find time to play all the interesting titles. Good times for the green rats.
Not so obvious or I wouldn't have asked. If "not good enough" is about being a few ticks off in a metacritic score then I wish I hadn't.
Wo Long, Redfall, Lies of Pi, Starfield, Frorza & many more, looks good to me.Great start, hopefully they can keep it going throughout the year.
Definitely! Hellblade 2 would be the cherry on topWo Long, Redfall, Lies of Pi, Starfield, Frorza & many more, looks good to me.
I buy plenty of games on Xbox. Just picked up hogwarts a few weeks ago, awesome game btw. I also love GP it's the best deal for 14.99/mo. It's already paid for itself this year and it's only Feb. People also forget or don't know that most new releases have a have a 10% discount if you have GP and you buy it. haters gonna hate..While you’re waiting, the rest of us are enjoying the day 1 releases on game pass.
That's most of people biggest issue.Too much to play.I don't have enough time to play it all.
Even Soul Hackers 2 is dropping out of nowhere.
bingo bangoThat's most of people biggest issue.Too much to play.
I trust steam reviews more which are from people who actually paid for the game more than biased critics.Also, Metacritic user score is a joke as anyone can leave a review and it can easily be review bombed.
those meta scores are the most accurate representative of the game's quality.I trust steam reviews more which are from people who actually paid for the game more than biased critics.Also, Metacritic user score is a joke as anyone can leave a review.
I have no idea why it scored so low. Loving this game, to me it's a 85.atomic heart is genuienly a fun game. dunno why it scores so bad. or maybe it scores normal and we lost the definition of normal. 75 80 shouldnt be bad but industry portrasy them as. maybe thats the problem
those meta scores are the most accurate representative of the game's quality.
is a good game. you cannot ignore the performance issues and design flaws. it has similar scores to Daya Gone for example. that ia what a 70/100 means.
Eish... if "hi-fi rush" and "atomic heart" is xboxs best stretch I'd be a little worried.
They are good games... but if this is them peaking... yeah I dunno
We haven't played any of those games.Those are just the smaller games. We know theres much bigger games coming like avowed, starfield, hellblade 2, fable etc..
Hopefully we get 1 or 2 big games per year from Microsoft until the end of the gen now.
What are the critics biased for In this case?I trust steam reviews more which are from people who actually paid for the game more than biased critics.Also, Metacritic user score is a joke as anyone can leave a review and it can easily be review bombed.
We haven't played any of those games.
Right now those are thee two games that ign is basing their hypothesis on.
Yeah no, one hit like hi fi rush doesnt make up for a full calendar year lacking any new triple a games from microsoft. Once they start putting out games like hi fi rush on a regular basis then we will talk. Whenever i bring up microsofts inability to release games the only response i get is “well the value of gamepass blah blah blah”
I never buy games unless I really want to play something day 1. For example Hogwarts Legacy I bought, but otherwise there really is no need to buy new games. There is more than enough great games on Game Pass. At least for my taste, and my life. I can't play 20 hours a week anymore, so it's not like I'm able to play all the great, and good games and "finish" Game Pass.I don't know how anyone could say game pass hasn't been strong every year. But hey, that's just me maybe.
I like the stream of games that usually I wouldn't rush out and buy myself, stuff like The Gunk and High On Life which I've enjoyed but would have passed me by without Gamepass.
It's an incredible service.
Russia bad so this game sucks.What are the critics biased for In this case?
What about the Persona games? Pretty sure ign gave P5R a 10.We haven't played any of those games.
Right now those are thee two games that ign is basing their hypothesis on.