• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Insane Man takes ownership of Petco Park from San Diego City and Padres.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
A legally insane person walked into the County Recorder's office and filed a title deed to the $500,000,000.00 Ballpark in downtown San Diego, and the clerks were required to file it in connection with the deed because its not their job to dispute bogus transactions. Worse yet, nobody knows how to "undo" the transaction even if its bogus - the immediate response was to file criminal fraud charges against the guy. Except they couldn't, because he was legally insane and the statute that allows them to void the transaction specifically requires a conviction, which is impossible against a legally insane person.

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2015/dec/24/petco-park-mcquaig-title-transfer-bogus/

SAN DIEGO — Derris Devon McQuaig took legal title to the downtown ballpark away from the city and the Padres two years ago by walking into the San Diego County Recorder’s Officer and submitting a properly filled-out deed transfer.

Seriously.

County and city officials have been quietly trying to remedy the situation ever since, but a felony fraud case against McQuaig was dismissed last week after a judge ruled he’s not mentally competent to be prosecuted.

Because no actual sale or transaction took place, government officials and real estate experts say there’s essentially no chance of McQuaig taking control of the property, which was recently appraised at $539 million and is slated to host its first All-Star game in July.

...

So county officials quickly alerted the District Attorney’s Office, prompting a criminal case against McQuaig which, if successful, would have voided his title and wiped it from the public record.

Steve Spinella, the deputy district attorney who prosecuted the case, said his goals included seeking punishment for a clear case of fraud and rectifying the situation for the city and the Padres.

...

Psychiatric examination by Dr. Michael Takamura, however, determined that McQuaig was not mentally competent and that "there is no substantial likelihood that the defendant will regain mental competence in the foreseeable future."


That prompted Superior Court Judge Steven Stone to dismiss the criminal case on Dec. 16, order McQuaig committed to Patton State Hospital in San Bernardino County, and give psychiatric security personnel there the authority to administer antipsychotic medication against McQuaig’s will.

Spinella said that decision eliminated any chance of voiding the deed under criminal law.

"The statute is very specific that a conviction is required,"
he said. "There’s just no avenue forward. We certainly want to achieve justice for victims, but we can only do so within the confines of our jurisdiction."

...

"As long as he’s crossed his t’s and dotted his i’s and filled in the blanks sufficiently on the grant deed, we’re required to record it," Olson said. “He had no legal authority to transfer Petco Park to himself, but it becomes part of the public record.”
 

Machina

Banned
Wow. It's appropriate that an insane person managed to achieve this because America has truly lost the plot.
 

Assanova

Member
This is amazing. It reminds me of those squatters that were moving into extremely large houses and somehow couldn't be kicked out.
 

Dishwalla

Banned
This guy should host a huge party on one of the nights the Padres are scheduled to play and refuse the game from carrying on. This is my house, go find somewhere else to play.
 

Nivash

Member
IANAL but if he's legally insane, wouldn't that prevent him from entering a legal contract in the first place? Couldn't they just try to file a motion for the court to dismiss the claim on that basis?
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
"The statute is very specific that a conviction is required," he said. "There’s just no avenue forward. We certainly want to achieve justice for victims

Sorry, what victims? The article notes that "there’s essentially no chance of McQuaig taking control of the property", that "a legal and bureaucratic nightmare ... could be perpetrated on any property owner", that "I don’t think in any way it would be deemed credible", that "it could cause headaches for someone down the road", etc. And this has gone on for two years only in the world of the hypothetical?

What victims exist? What justice could be had? What injustice has occurred? Isn't what the prosecutor trying to do actually to pre-empt potential future harms?
 
Sorry, what victims? The article notes that "there’s essentially no chance of McQuaig taking control of the property", that "a legal and bureaucratic nightmare ... could be perpetrated on any property owner", that "I don’t think in any way it would be deemed credible", that "it could cause headaches for someone down the road, etc.

What victims exist? What justice could be had? What injustice has occurred? Isn't what the prosecutor trying to do actually to pre-empt potential future harms?

Yeah. This is pretty ridiculous.

How is this even fraud? He tries to buy property, can't afford property, doesn't buy property, case closed. It's absurd that there's no way for the real property owner to void this. Instead of trying to criminally prosecute this man they should be fixing the bureaucratic loophole.

Fix loophole, or throw a man in jail? Fixing stuff is hard... and this is America...
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Yeah. This is pretty ridiculous.

How is this even fraud? He tries to buy property, can't afford property, doesn't buy property, case closed. It's absurd that there's no way for the real property owner to void this. Instead of trying to criminally prosecute this man they should be fixing the bureaucratic loophole.

Fix loophole, or throw a man in jail? Fixing stuff is hard... and this is America...

The way they were planning to reverse is convicting him of fraud - they literally can't remove him from the title to the property without a conviction.
 

HUELEN10

Member
They can pull a "Ruth's Chris Steak House" if they wanted to, or make it so that Petco Park is not legally a park and do something with that.
 
This is amazing. It reminds me of those squatters that were moving into extremely large houses and somehow couldn't be kicked out.

Squatters have an amazing assortment of rights in some US states, it makes it almost impossible to get rid of them without lengthy court battles and a pile of legal fees a mile high. And even then the property owners still might not win.

As to this story though.... damn. Thats going to become a legal quagmire if they can't figure it out somehow.
 

HUELEN10

Member
Companies spend large amounts of money to name stadiums.

Heinz Field
Staples Center
Etc.

Don't forget the Amway Center and EverBank Field.

EverBank Field has the LARGEST HD screens in the world. You can see the light pollution emanating from it from 20 miles away!
 

The Beard

Member
This country's laws are so fucking absurd. Literally anyone can walk into the county recorders office, including mentally ill homeless people, with no evidence and claim the deed on another mans property. Then the rightful owner must take the time and money to fight it. WHY is this a fucking thing?
 

HUELEN10

Member
What's the pixel density tho that's important

I did all the math (the green-eyed monster never goes away, it just lays dormant).

So, let's talk! Every pixel is 1.3 centimeters big with the screen being 110 by 18 m which means that the diagonal in feel would be 366 feet. This means at a pixel density of 1.95 pixels per inch for the approximately 8460 x 1384 display, it can be considered high density or retina as some would call it, when viewed from 4478 centimeters, or 146 feet away. The width of an NFL field is 160 feet, meaning that these displays have THAT high of a pixel density and are ultra-sharp.

So yeah, I am glad you asked. Made my town proud AND it was fun to figure out!
 
It's good to see someone showing some entrepreneurial spirit and trying to pull themselves up by their bootstraps to rise above their lowly position. They should be applauded. Isn't this the American Dream? To better oneself?
 

NiMe Rli

Banned
I did all the math (the green-eyed monster never goes away, it just lays dormant).

So, let's talk! Every pixel is 1.3 centimeters big with the screen being 110 by 18 m which means that the diagonal in feel would be 366 feet. This means at a pixel density of 1.95 pixels per inch for the approximately 8460 x 1384 display, it can be considered high density or retina as some would call it, when viewed from 4478 centimeters, or 146 feet away. The width of an NFL field is 160 feet, meaning that these displays have THAT high of a pixel density and are ultra-sharp.

So yeah, I am glad you asked. Made my town proud AND it was fun to figure out!

Well now I'm impressed. I'm glad it was fun to do, because I'd feel bad for asking otherwise.
 

Machine

Member
The article seems incomplete. They tried to void the deed through criminal proceedings and couldn't do it but that's not the end of the story. Now they just have to file a quiet title action (which is a civil proceeding). It will take longer and cost more but in the end they will still be able to get a judge to void the deed. Wild deeds aren't that hard to void.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
The problem is that it will take forever and cost a shitload in attorney's fees to do a quiet title action. Criminal cases are a billion times faster because of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.
 
The problem is that it will take forever and cost a shitload in attorney's fees to do a quiet title action. Criminal cases are a billion times faster because of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.

considering the act occurred two years ago, and was known at the time, it seems the da and clerks were trying to make an example of this guy rather than just going through the administrative process.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom