Intel unveils 1 teraflop chip with 50 plus cores

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow: Intel unveils 1 teraflop chip with 50 plus cores

It wasn't that long ago that Intel was boasting about the first supercomputer with sustained 1 teraflop performance. That was in 1997, on a system with 9,298 Pentium II chips that filled 72 computing cabinets.

Now Intel has squeezed that much performance onto a matchbook-sized chip, dubbed "Knights Corner," based on its new "Many Integrated Core" architecture, or MIC. (Earlier I referred to it as "Knights Ferry," which is its development kit.)
It was designed largely in the Portland area and has just started manufacturing.

"In 15 years that's what we've been able to do. That is stupendous. You're witnessing the 1 teraflop barrier busting," Rajeeb Hazra, general manager of Intel's technical computing group, said at an unveiling ceremony.

Ughh, typo in the title should say 1 teraflop
 
IMG_2158-thumb-600x800-27699.jpg


"Sir, but can it run Crysis?"
"Girl, whatchu think?"
 
Oh shit, the second coming of Larrabee! Too bad we'll never see what this could have been if it stayed a GPU...
Spider from Mars said:
Sounds made up
They've been demo-ing these since 2009 or so. It's basically a crapload of low power Intel Atom cores smooshed onto a single die.
 
I want this just to have it now. I don't even know wtf i'd do with it. Run folding @ home I guess.
 
ReBurn said:
Maybe they'll use it in the new Xbox.
Well, the main purpose of this thing is to serve as a co-processor for floating-point calculations, meaning you could potentially use it like Cell and offload stuff like physics, heavy number crunching, and certain visual effects.
 
Intel already did this with Larrabee two years ago, though...

Justin Rattner, Intel CTO, delivered a keynote at the Supercomputing 2009 conference on November 17, 2009. During his talk he demonstrated an overclocked Larrabee processor topping one TeraFLOPS in performance. He claimed this was the first public demonstration of a single chip solution exceeding one TeraFLOPS.

The second demo was given at the SC09 conference in Portland at November 17, 2009 during a keynote by Intel CTO Justin Rattner. A Larrabee card was able to achieve 1006 GFLops in the SGEMM 4Kx4K calculation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larrabee_(microarchitecture)
 
So we'd still need around 180 of these chips to get around the equivalent of our current renderfarm. Assuming core performance is roughly about the same 1:1 anyway.
 
Seems destined to live in the realm of special applications. We have a hard enough time getting most programs to use 4 cores. Forget 50.
 
XiaNaphryz said:
So we'd still need around 180 of these chips to get around the equivalent of our current renderfarm. Assuming core performance is roughly about the same 1:1 anyway.
Geez... how many processors does your renderfarm have? Or is it GPUs?
 
That article has it wrong. Knights Ferry is the older revision. The one demoed was Knight Corner. There are big differences between the two.
 
XiaNaphryz said:
So we'd still need around 180 of these chips to get around the equivalent of our current renderfarm. Assuming core performance is roughly about the same 1:1 anyway.
Or you can double that 180 and have twice the performance of your current renderfarm! Yea boi.
 
XMonkey said:
Seems destined to live in the realm of special applications. We have a hard enough time getting most programs to use 4 cores. Forget 50.
These would be used for number crunching applications in much the same way as CUDA or OpenCL on newer video cards. Also, I'm sure there's some way to coax these into giving you insane scores on various mass computing programs like World Community Grid for Folding@Home.
 
Marvel_us said:
That article has it wrong. Knights Ferry is the older revision. The one demoed was Knight Corner. There are big differences between the two.

Yeah. Knight's Corner is the 50+ core version and will use Intel's 22nm process.
 
Marvel_us said:
That article has it wrong. Knights Ferry is the older revision. The one demoed was Knight Corner. There are big differences between the two.

Article has been changed.

Now Intel has squeezed that much performance onto a matchbook-sized chip, dubbed "Knights Corner," based on its new "Many Integrated Core" architecture, or MIC. (Earlier I referred to it as "Knights Ferry," which is its development kit.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom