iPhone - Official Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
So I'm interested in buying an iPhone, if I buy one at the apple store would I have to activate it in store?

My contract doesn't end until march 09' so would that mean I have to pay full price then?

I hope not.
 
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:
Why would you think you'd get charged?
No, they just pulled the idea of an AIM app using SMS rather than data out of their ass. There's never been an application that ever did that. Never ever.

Jeez.
 
Bboy AJ said:
No, they just pulled the idea of an AIM app using SMS rather than data out of their ass. There's never been an application that ever did that. Never ever.

Jeez.

If my sarcasm detector is functioning correctly, I would say that you're implying that there in fact has been such an AIM app, which strikes me as technically infeasible. Are you sure?
Perhaps an AIM app that charges you as if every IM was an SMS, but not really what you're saying.
 
Worm_Buffet said:
If my sarcasm detector is functioning correctly, I would say that you're implying that there in fact has been such an AIM app, which strikes me as technically infeasible. Are you sure?
Perhaps an AIM app that charges you as if every IM was an SMS, but not really what you're saying.
Yes, there has been such an application in other phones before. I am 100% sure. Every IM you sent/received counted as an SMS.
 
Yeah ok, but that just means your provider was scamming you as much on data as they are on SMSs. No SMSs are actually being sent.

IM is just data like anything else on the Internet, so unless you're using some special client that goes through the provider, there's no reason to believe you will be charged extra for it.
 
Some previous phones that didn't have Internet/Data plans had instant messengers that used SMS. It was an alternative way to "chat" when you didn't have a true data connection.
 
Kung Fu Jedi said:
Some previous phones that didn't have Internet/Data plans had instant messengers that used SMS. It was an alternative way to "chat" when you didn't have a true data connection.
Which is why people have a little doubt and ask beforehand.

wurm said:
IM is just data like anything else on the Internet, so unless you're using some special client that goes through the provider, there's no reason to believe you will be charged extra for it.
SMS is also just 'data'.
 
Kung Fu Jedi said:
Some previous phones that didn't have Internet/Data plans had instant messengers that used SMS. It was an alternative way to "chat" when you didn't have a true data connection.

Oh, I see. But are we talking AIM here and tunneling that protocol over SMS? Did they encode contact list updates over 160 bytes and charge for those too?:D

dallow_bg said:
SMS is also just 'data'.

In a sense, yes. But then so is telephone calls.

I meant that IM is 'just data' in the sense that the packet contents are defined by the application, and not by some cell phone standard.
 
Worm_Buffet said:
Yeah ok, but that just means your provider was scamming you as much on data as they are on SMSs. No SMSs are actually being sent.

IM is just data like anything else on the Internet, so unless you're using some special client that goes through the provider, there's no reason to believe you will be charged extra for it.
What exactly are you even arguing here? The way providers scam their customers? I agree with you there but that is not why I brought up my point in the first place. My point was is that it's not unreasonable for people to think using an IM application will use their SMS plan rather than data plan as it's occurred in the past before. I don't doubt that some phones still do it.
 
Worm_Buffet said:
Oh, I see. But are we talking AIM here and tunneling that protocol over SMS? Did they encode contact list updates over 160 bytes and charge for those too?:D

I've seen IM that was AIM that worked like what I described above, but I believe you had to enter your contacts in manually. No syncing of your AIM contacts as I recall.
 
Kung Fu Jedi said:
I've seen IM that was AIM that worked like what I described above, but I believe you had to enter your contacts in manually. No syncing of your AIM contacts as I recall.
I remember you had to create a group in your contacts list on your computer called "mobile".... or something similar, and that list would sync with the phone app.
 
Bboy AJ said:
What exactly are you even arguing here? The way providers scam their customers? I agree with you there but that is not why I brought up my point in the first place. My point was is that it's not unreasonable for people to think using an IM application will use their SMS plan rather than data plan as it's occurred in the past before. I don't doubt that some phones still do it.

You said "Every IM you sent/received counted as an SMS" which led me to believe that you thought the IMs were still being sent as 'data', but that the provider would somehow monitor your traffic for IMs and charge you extra for those. I was trying to elucidate the technical difference between that and something proprietary, like the ridiculous AIM over SMS scheme that I see now that you actually were referring to.

Still, imo asking whether a free, public website like Meebo that you can access like any other website would cost you extra, is just silly and did warrant liu kang's loveable patronization.
 
Bboy AJ said:
No, they just pulled the idea of an AIM app using SMS rather than data out of their ass. There's never been an application that ever did that. Never ever.

Jeez.


I think Yahoo's oneconnect can do sms.
 
Worm_Buffet said:
Still, imo asking whether a free, public website like Meebo that you can access like any other website would cost you extra, is just silly and did warrant liu kang's loveable patronization.

Essentially this.
 
DarkJC said:
Essentially this.
Except you said this:
I'd like to echo this sentiment. What's with people thinking they'll get charged for text messages for using instant messengers? It's all just data, people. Those apps are using the data network, you're paying for x amount of data, so it'll use whatever data it needs, and that's all. It's not a tough concept to grasp.
Yeah, those older AIM apps that people used to have on their phones charged them for it.
Meebo is another story, but asking if the AIM app is going to charge per IM is understandable.
 
neojubei said:
I think Yahoo's oneconnect can do sms.
Wait, sorry for going a little off-topic. I can send free sms's to a cellphone from yahoo messenger? I just tried, but wanna make sure it doesn't cost me anything?
 
Anastacio said:
Wait, sorry for going a little off-topic. I can send free sms's to a cellphone from yahoo messenger? I just tried, but wanna make sure it doesn't cost me anything?
It doesn't, but I can understand why you would ask. :)
 
Kung Fu Jedi said:
LOL! Why are we continuing to beat THIS topic to death too. :lol
Nothing new I guess. :(

We should discuss apps more in here.
I love Grafitto and MotionX Poker which I just recently bought now that it is $0.99 .
 
Is there a way for me to send SMS without actually sending SMS? An application or website that sends one for me? I ask because I'd like to send some occasionally, but don't feel like paying for them (I have a data plan, but no SMS plan).
 
TheExodu5 said:
Is there a way for me to send SMS without actually sending SMS? An application or website that sends one for me? I ask because I'd like to send some occasionally, but don't feel like paying for them (I have a data plan, but no SMS plan).
And as we've been talking about, you can use the AIM app to send SMS to phones.
 
TheExodu5 said:
Is there a way for me to send SMS without actually sending SMS? An application or website that sends one for me? I ask because I'd like to send some occasionally, but don't feel like paying for them (I have a data plan, but no SMS plan).

Isn't this what we've been talking about? Sending them from an IM application instead?
 
dallow_bg said:
And as we've been talking about, you can use the AIM app to send SMS to phones.

I thought they were talking about using an IM program that sends SMS to IM clients (so users without a data plan can send IMs).
 
TheExodu5 said:
I thought they were talking about using an IM program that sends SMS to IM clients (so users without a data plan can send IMs).
No......... not at all..... :D

Just use AIM to send either instant messages to other AIM folks, or SMS to others' phones.
 
I currently have the 3G option turned off and my battery life is decent. I don't do that much web surfing with the phone so it isn't a big deal to not have it enabled. Does 3G only impact the data speeds? Any advantage to using it for phone calls?
 
lionelhutz said:
I currently have the 3G option turned off and my battery life is decent. I don't do that much web surfing with the phone so it isn't a big deal to not have it enabled. Does 3G only impact the data speeds? Any advantage to using it for phone calls?

3G is supposed to have better voice quality but I can't tell myself. the best thing about it, aside from the speed, is the ability to talk and check the web at the same time. could be useful if you need to look something up while talking to them.
 
lionelhutz said:
I currently have the 3G option turned off and my battery life is decent. I don't do that much web surfing with the phone so it isn't a big deal to not have it enabled. Does 3G only impact the data speeds? Any advantage to using it for phone calls?


I have it on and after the 2.1 update, battery life is excellent even with 3G on. The 2.1 update is a must have.
 
LCfiner said:
3G is supposed to have better voice quality but I can't tell myself. the best thing about it, aside from the speed, is the ability to talk and check the web at the same time. could be useful if you need to look something up while talking to them.

I can't argue with voice quality. My calls are clear over Edge and people have commented that they can't tell a difference between speakerphone and normal calling. My reason for asking is mostly out of OCD because I have a feature that I'm not using and it sort of bugs me. :lol

I'm also on 2.1
 
lionelhutz said:
I can't argue with voice quality. My calls are clear over Edge and people have commented that they can't tell a difference between speakerphone and normal calling. My reason for asking is mostly out of OCD because I have a feature that I'm not using and it sort of bugs me. :lol

I'm also on 2.1

I wonder if there's an improvement in battery life with 3G turned off (I'm on wifi all day and I can eek out maybe 4-5 hours of browsing and some music a day, I want to see if I can get more if 3G is off).
 
MercuryLS said:
I wonder if there's an improvement in battery life with 3G turned off (I'm on wifi all day and I can eek out maybe 4-5 hours of browsing and some music a day, I want to see if I can get more if 3G is off).

there is. try it out one day to see exactly how much. It should be closer to the 1st gen iPhone numbers.

HOWEVER, if you're actively browsing and downloading on wifi for 5 hours every day, then any battery boost will be negligible. maybe an extra hour :\
 
drknite said:

Okay, thanks.

Wow, nothing less than that?

With T-Mobile and the Sidekick, I pay $30 for 300 minutes per month and unlimited weekends I believe. $20 more for unlimited text and all that stuff.

With AT&T and the iPhone, it's more than double that $30 for 150 more minutes? Plus, the extra $20 on top of that for unlimited texting? So, $90+taxes a month?

Wow.

Excuse my ignorance, but is that because AT&T are assholes or does it have to do with the iPhone being 3G?
 
dallow_bg said:
Yeah, those older AIM apps that people used to have on their phones charged them for it.
Meebo is another story, but asking if the AIM app is going to charge per IM is understandable.

Before today, I had never heard of AIM apps that used SMS (or charged) to send its messages. Regardless, I said "essentially this" because the comment about meebo was the one that pushed me over the edge with the constant "so wait, I can send instant messages and I don't get charged????" questions that we get every page or so of this thread.

Anyway lets just drop it, it's been beaten to death by now.

EDIT:

omg rite said:
Okay, thanks.

Wow, nothing less than that?

With T-Mobile and the Sidekick, I pay $30 for 300 minutes per month and unlimited weekends I believe. $20 more for unlimited text and all that stuff.

With AT&T and the iPhone, it's more than double that $30 for 150 more minutes? Plus, the extra $20 on top of that for unlimited texting? So, $90+taxes a month?

Wow.

Excuse my ignorance, but is that because AT&T are assholes or does it have to do with the iPhone being 3G?

It has to do with the fact that you're essentially getting 450 minutes for $40, unlimited data usage for $30, and then texting and crap for $20. It's the data that adds so much to the price.
 
thought I'd show this off

29oiwdt.jpg
 
Crashfari is fucking awful.

Someone ought to sue Apple for this bullshit. I absolutely cannot post shit to GAF from that POS phone. Three sentences max, and then Crashfari shits on itself like some shitty Microsoft application losing all my hen-pecking.

I really want to throw this fucking thing into a wall.

It's bad enough I can't natively disable images and other functions of the web, but the god damn thing isn't even stable.

Come on Apple, get your fucking shit together. If this is supposed to be an exceptional smart phone, then it's got a lot in common with being an exceptional special ed. student. >:|
 
Anyone else Having problems with Safari crashing since updating to 2.1? All other problems have gone away for me but now his is hapening. Safari never crashed once before on me till the update.
 
You should exchange your phone for a new one then.
That's not supposed to happen.
 
I just got the Air Share PDF viewer/reader up and working and I am wondering:

Does, once the file transfer is complete to the Public Folder, it store them locally on my phone or does it keep them on the net?

Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom