No, read Husserl.
Theoretical abstractions aren't more real than the phenomena they were created to describe or explain. You have to be pretty backwards to think otherwise.
Next we'll be getting upset, since our brains are apparently 'meat computers', that we don't have infallible memory like real computers do. But these are just descriptive analogies, they don't touch the reality of our experience as humans being different from that of a computer. If we think otherwise and hold up 'meat computers' as our standard then suddenly human existence becomes a flaw because we aren't like computers. It's a ridiculous line of thinking because it's completely ass backwards. Things are what they reveal themselves to be through our experience. We'll never experience an atom, so why the fuck would we convince ourselves that, say, atoms are "more real" than the reality that actually announces itself directly to us?
