That's what you get for listening to shitty podcasts.
Pre-modern internet, the "japanese animation" that people bothered to localize for the US tended to be of a high quality or at least conformed to American sensibilities reasonably well.
Post internet, it became easy to be exposed to all the loli/moe/hentai garbage that previously wouldn't leave Japan, and that stuff makes a lot of people (rightfully) uncomfortable. This greater access and exposure to the full spectrum of anime unfairly poisoned the well for the genre. "Anime" doesn't evoke things like Dragonball or Speed Racer to the mainstream; if it evokes anything it probably is linked to meaning foreign cartoons for perverts. In the same way that "Catholic priest=pedophile" has been beaten into people's heads by pop culture, "anime=creepy" to people that don't watch it, reinforced by sitcoms and internet memes.
but it's also reminded me about some recent comments in Twitter on how hating Anime is becoming an increasing thing among mainstream commentators.
Anime like any other medium has some real quality stuff amidst a pile of crap.
People who hate on it are probably focusing on the crap.
![]()
Because a gif response deserves a gif in kind.
the quality is exactly the same, it's just that people only remember the good things, it's just as easy to find and watch good shows today as it was back in the 90s or whatever
Its probably because the quality of the anime shows is pretty bad compared to shows when it became popular.
To be fair, in my experience, finding the good stuff is pretty goddamn challenging. Im not an idiot though, I KNOW there must be some good anime around, its just that I think a lot of it won't and doesn't appeal to me.
I don't know if that actually means anything though. You're talking about a genre that only ever existed at a certain point in time and has since faded away in every medium. Why would anime be any different?I would argue that that isn't true. Although, I'd probably set the timeframe at the early 2000s. Just look at my example. There literally hasn't been any good cyberpunk that's compared to GiTS, and that aired around 10 years ago!
It most surely is if you're looking for something more than just entertainment. Not that shows like FMA or One Piece suck or anything (they're awesome), but I wouldn't call them good.Well, that depends how you define "challenging". I don't think it's that hard to find good anime to watch. Sure, once you've seen something like 300 titles you might run into trouble but before then it's not very difficult.
If moe anime is taking over the industry, that's only because that's what's selling. We have no one to blame but ourselves. Support the shows you want more of.
I hate 95% of animes in last few years (2009+) and this is coming from someone who watched anime since very young age 20 years ago.
I grow-up watching:
Rose of versailles
Cowboy beboo
Trigun
Rurouni kenshin ,
Slam dunk
One piece
Hunterxhunter (1st run)
Full metal alchemist (1st run)
Monster
Ghibils movies
Gurren Lagnn
Mushishi
Gundam wing
Now compare the list above with recent years animes and you will understand the growth hatred of anime!
Huh? Most things people watch are for entertainment. I don't understand what criteria you're drawing up that most works fail because you haven't explained what it even is.It most surely is if you're looking for something more than just entertainment. Not that shows like FMA or One Piece suck or anything (they're awesome), but I wouldn't call them good.
Mushishi is good.
How is it reasonable to to put 90 years on anime on side of your example (1917-2008) and 5 years of show (2009+) on the other? What?I hate 95% of animes in last few years (2009+) and this is coming from someone who watched anime since very young age 20 years ago.
I grow-up watching:
Rose of versailles
Cowboy beboo
Trigun
Rurouni kenshin ,
Slam dunk
One piece
Hunterxhunter (1st run)
Full metal alchemist (1st run)
Monster
Ghibil’s movies
Gurren Lagnn
Mushishi
Gundam wing
Now compare the list above with recent years animes and you will understand the growth hatred of anime!
Huh? Most things people watch are for entertainment. I don't understand what criteria you're drawing up that most works fail because you haven't explained what it even is.
I raise you:
Madoka Magika
Steins;Gate
Fate/Zero
Code Geass
Higurashi no Naku Koro ni (Kai)
Attack on Titan
Tokyo in Terror
Aldnoah Zero
You're welcome.
Like many have stated, the quality hasn't changed; there's just more exposure to crap due to Internet.
I used to get down with anime back when the main characters were older. Shows like Trigun, Cowboy Bebop, Samurai Champloo, Hellsing, Berserk had casts who consisted of characters that were at least over 20.
It seems like within the last few years, more and more contemporary anime characters are in high school or younger and are trying to save the world. I'm sick of the angst, the moe, and the convoluted plots. I no longer watch anime because of these things.
Don't get me wrong though because I still love anime movies like Ghibli stuff, and I still like the anime aesthetic.
some anime fans are embarrassing
some anime fans are embarrassing
As explained previously, the shows have always been bad. It's just that now every single show is made available to the English speaking audience instead of a select few.
Which is why most people love average stuff. Because it's designed to be entertaining and has no artistic ambition whatsoever.
For example, the consensus within the anime community that GitS: SAC is better than GitS (1995) is sickening and frankly all I need to want as much distance from it as possible.
GitS has an almost Tarkovsky-ian level of finnesse in it's execution (both visually AND thematically) that essentially makes it a timeless masterpiece. SAC is a cyberpunk soap opera.
Which is why most people love average stuff. Because it's designed to be entertaining and has no artistic ambition whatsoever.
For example, the consensus within the anime community that GitS: SAC is better than GitS (1995) is sickening and frankly all I need to want as much distance from it as possible.
GitS has an almost Tarkovsky-ian level of finnesse in it's execution (both visually AND thematically) that essentially makes it a timeless masterpiece. SAC is a cyberpunk soap opera.
I look at it this way. It's easy to say American TV is great if all you're watching is True Dick, Fargo, Orange is the New Black, and whatever other critically acclaimed show you can think of.What's more, when anime exploded in popularity in the West we suddenly got to experience cream of the crop from over decade of the medium. Now we're watching season by season
I see you picking up cream of the crop from 30 years and complaining last 5 didn't have as many stand out series.I hate 95% of animes in last few years (2009+) and this is coming from someone who watched anime since very young age 20 years ago.
I grow-up watching:
Rose of versailles
Cowboy beboo
Trigun
Rurouni kenshin ,
Slam dunk
One piece
Hunterxhunter (1st run)
Full metal alchemist (1st run)
Monster
Ghibil’s movies
Gurren Lagnn
Mushishi
Gundam wing
Now compare the list above with recent years animes and you will understand the growth hatred of anime!
Some fan of anything is embarrassing. It's not like this is specific to anime. With any medium/culture/fandom..there is always going to be people that are extreme or embarrassing.
I look at it this way. It's easy to say American TV is great if all you're watching is True Dick, Fargo, Orange is the New Black, and whatever other critically acclaimed show you can think of.
But you're not including Storage Wars and Honey Boo Boo and Housewives of Timbucktoo and all the other crap that you see fill the other 95% of American channels.
Which is why most people love average stuff. Because it's designed to be entertaining and has no artistic ambition whatsoever.
For example, the consensus within the anime community that GitS: SAC is better than GitS (1995) is sickening and frankly all I need to want as much distance from it as possible.
GitS has an almost Tarkovsky-ian level of finnesse in it's execution (both visually AND thematically) that essentially makes it a timeless masterpiece. SAC is a cyberpunk soap opera.
Another reason is that most anime is shit and there hasnt been a break out anime.
some anime fans are embarrassing
I raise you:
Madoka Magika
Steins;Gate
Fate/Zero
Code Geass
Higurashi no Naku Koro ni (Kai)
Attack on Titan
Tokyo in Terror
Aldnah Zeroo
You're welcome.
Like many have stated, the quality hasn't changed; there's just more exposure to crap due to Internet.
How is it reasonable to to put 90 years on anime on side of your example (1917-2008) and 5 years of show (2009+) on the other? What?
I see you picking up cream of the crop from 30 years and complaining last 5 didn't have as many stand out series.
Well, Psycho Pass is a bad show.
Hyperbole much? There's a lot of merit to the opinion of SAC being better. It essentially takes the movie's "plot" (since it's not exactly the same, but touches on the same general ideas) and gives it 26 episodes to expand upon. While I personally think the movie is AMAZING, I found that it made significantly more sense after watching SAC, if only because I had more time to learn about the world and its themes.
It's basically what the Akira manga is to the movie, but that doesn't necessarily take away from the movie's merits
That's because the movie was pretty empty. Beautiful done, but there was barely any story in it and characters were all completely bland.SaC isn't as tightly made, but it tells a lot more interesting stories through eyes of characters with actual personality.
Okay, so to be clear, what you're saying is that it's hard to fine anime that have artistic ambition?
Lets consider a few things here:
- I was originally responding to a comment by Cipherr who said it was hard to find good anime. Cipherr didn't define what good meant, exactly, but I assume it isn't limited to 'artistically ambitious' works. Therefore I responded by saying that you can find several hundred 'good' works if we define 'good' in terms of what people generally mean on the internet. Perhaps these titles are not challenging or radical but they all well made works feature good stories with good characters.
- Therefore your initial rebuttal doesn't quite fit into this line of thinking because you're talking about a completely different thing to what we were talking about above.
- Now, if I was to talk about your subject e.g. "anime with artistic ambition" I would have to concede that it's fairly difficult to find works that fit into that limited definition. They certainly exist but there aren't that many, which isn't really that different to say, television shows.
- This is because the anime industry is, just like every other industry, a business that's focused on making money and selling product. No-one is going to give you the money, or resources, or time, to make anything risky or experimental or different. Most of the time you'll just be making adaptations of other works e.g. manga.
- This is fundamentally different to say, film, where just about anyone could make a movie. Anime production, by it's very nature, requires the work of dozens and dozens of people and multiple organisations of all whom have to be paid. That's why there's little in the way of 'independent animation'.
- Of course, from time to time, artistically ambitious works well get made. Just last year, for example, the extremely ambitious and very powerful Flowers of Evil series aired. So as I've said above it's not that different from US TV. You get a few radical shows here and there while the rest of is largely disposable entertainment.
SAC is cool, yeah, but if you think the movie made more sense after watching it, you still didn't get the movie. It has nothing to do with either SAC or the manga. It's something else entirely.
This is exactly what I mean. This audience only cares for plot exposition and is completely oblivious to subtext and narrative, not to mention the themes that the movie explores. They only want cool characters doing objectively quantifiable stuff they can remembet. Thry don't want to be have their perception challenged.
This is exactly why I dislike the anime comunity. You are a perfect encapsulation of almost everyone in it and you're so blind to the narrative styles developed in film history by people like Bergman or Bresson that you can't even appreciate what Oshii created in GitS.
You crave the linear and entertaining narrative Hollywood has accustomed you to and you can't seem to let go of that format and it's characteristics when faced with something different.
That you can look at GitS and seriously think there was barely any story says it all. You're actually actively looking for plot in a film whose narrative thrives on subtext and symbolism.
Which essentially, is my entire point. You need a product to be entertaining to enjoy it. You don't want to be challenged. You want ease of use.
This is a bad opinion.