Is Marijuana harmless?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nothing is completely harmless. People get killed by toasters. It's all about the degree of harm and the possibility of it occurring, so effectively the statement is true because it's certainly not very harmful to most people.
 
Depends on how you use it. If you let yourself become addicted to it, then it's far from harmless. But it's the same with lots of things. Alcohol, Internet, potato chips, etc.

But largely, yeah, it's a lot more harmless than the man wants you to think. Less harmless than alcohol or cigarettes, definitely.
 
Of course it's not harmless.

It has risks to do with excessive and sustained used just like a lot of things. The problem is that in zeal to have it tread as a drug on the same level as things that are just as bad, if not worse (cigarettes, alcohol), people are trying to say that it's literally harmless, which is stupid. Although, it's less harmless than listening to Bill Maher.
 
Harmless? No.

less harmful than most other legal drugs? Yes.
 
Marijuana is harmless in the right conditions, in the wrong one it's like any vice. The drug has a psychological effect that makes you think can become addicted, studies have show it's not physically addicting. Personally I'm going with that considering I can quit at the drop of dime, yet when it comes to one of my own siblings they seem to think they need it for anything to be fun.

There is an official thread for the subject.
 
legend166 said:
Of course it's not harmless.

It has risks to do with excessive and sustained used just like a lot of things. The problem is that in zeal to have it tread as a drug on the same level as things that are just as bad, if not worse (cigarettes, alcohol), people are trying to say that it's literally harmless, which is stupid. Although, it's less harmless than listening to Bill Maher.


This.

Any time you are putting smoke into your lungs, it's bad for you.

I think one of the problems people have with marijuana vs alchohol or cigarettes is that if Jimmy is standing outside blazing in the middle of a crowd, other people can feel the effects from him smoking. If he drinks alchohol, nobody else gets even a little drunk without ingesting it.
 
pgtl_10 said:
Bill Maher on Larry King says it is. He is not the first to say that. Is their any truth to that?

Well look'r here Mortimer! It's TRUE! I heard it on the squawkin' box!

No way Jasper! That ain't trueeeee. But you know what's true, is your sister got some goddamn hot titties. She was droopin' them infront of me when I was watching NASCAR.

Shit watch your tounge boy, you know I got dibs on her already.
 
I understand why people want weed legalized. If nicotine and alcohol are then why not weed?

However I wouldn't be surprised if lung cancer and other diseases start popping up years after being legalized. Research seems sketchy on the topic.
 
pgtl_10 said:
I understand why people want weed legalized. If nicotine and alcohol are then why not weed?

Because alcohol has various uses. Not everyone buys it to drink. Some that do, don't abuse it.

When you smoke pot in contrast, you are instantly intoxicated/impaired. It's a legal issue.

Cigarettes can go to hell, but no reason to outlaw them. The fatcats would never let that happen anyway.
 
Tyrone Slothrop said:
marijuana kills

i had a cousin that got addicted to it and ended up going blind in one eye

thats called being addicted to crack, having no cash, sucking dick for it, and take one to many loads in the eye.
 
pgtl_10 said:
However I wouldn't be surprised if lung cancer and other diseases start popping up years after being legalized. Research seems sketchy on the topic.
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

BTW, Brownies are the way to go.
 
Of course not.

It is a drug that can be abused just like any other.

But when compared to currently legal drugs like alcohol (which if you drink to much of it you... die) and tobacco (which if you smoke to much of it you... get cancer and die) it is pure and simply ridiculous that it is illegal.
 
1. Carcenogens. Inhaling any smoke is bad. So is living around car fumes.

2. It apparantly causes the dendrites in your brain to widen, making it less easily for signals to be transmitted between them. This causes memory loss.. Spaciness. This is not seriously debilitating, but it is a real effect. Heavy pot use can lead to airheadedness.. But I wouldn't call this a real disability.

3. It makes hard work difficult because of reason 2, and coupled with psycological addiction it potentially lessens your productivity.

In my opinion these are small risks, but they are reasons to smoke in modoration.. In the right times and in the right amounts. It's not completely harmless, but certainly less harmful than most propoganda would indicate over the past 100 years...
 
It's not 'harmless', no.

People always say the fact that it is not that harmless as compared to currently legal drugs like cigarettes and alcohol as the reason it should be legalized.

The real reason it should be legalized is because the government should have no say what you put into your own body, whether it is harmful or not.
 
No, it's not harmless.

Is the harm less than the pleasure it gives? That's a subjective answer.

I would say to anyone, considering doing any drugs to research it and make a mature decision about it. Not do it because your mates do or anything like that. Drugs can be very positive, and they can really suck.
 
Medical use and decriminalization yes(slowly happening), legalization no. Allowing people to hallucinate in public would be socially irresponsible IMO.

Also, as other said nothing is harmless. At the very least: inhaling smoke is never good(I know you use it other ways), it can make people really paranoid, and it changes your physical appearance.
 
Amir0x said:
It's not 'harmless', no.

People always say the fact that it is not that harmless as compared to currently legal drugs like cigarettes and alcohol as the reason it should be legalized.

The real reason it should be legalized is because the government should have no say what you put into your own body, whether it is harmful or not.

This.

It's the same reason that prostitution being illegal is stupid (though since that's illegal on state/local levels, it's much harder to effect).
 
Buckethead said:
Because alcohol has various uses. Not everyone buys it to drink. Some that do, don't abuse it.

When you smoke pot in contrast, you are instantly intoxicated/impaired. It's a legal issue.

What the fuck are you talking about? Sure some people use wine and beer for cooking, but are you seriously going to argue that the overwhelming majority don't buy alcohol to get buzzed/drunk?

And what does it matter that marijuana goes into effect faster the alcohol? How should that in any way effect its legal status? Driving intoxicated is driving intoxicated whether it took you a half hour of drinking or a few minutes of smoking.

madara said:
If it has anything to do with whole Mexican drug trade going on, hell no.

And you do realize that the reason it gets mixed up in gang warfare is because it is illegal right, and nothing to do with the drug itself?
 
I think there's a risk in exaggerating the harm of pot, because when kids find out, they'll think the warnings about say, meth, are bullshit too. The man shouldn't waste his credibility on pot.
 
LCGeek said:
The drug has a psychological effect that makes you think can become addicted, studies have show it's not physically addicting. Personally I'm going with that considering I can quit at the drop of dime, yet when it comes to one of my own siblings they seem to think they need it for anything to be fun.

Uh huh. You'll have to excuse me if I don't find the "I can quit anytime, I just choose not to" type of statements to be the most credible sort.
 
Amir0x said:
It's not 'harmless', no.

People always say the fact that it is not that harmless as compared to currently legal drugs like cigarettes and alcohol as the reason it should be legalized.

The real reason it should be legalized is because the government should have no say what you put into your own body, whether it is harmful or not.

I agree to a certain extent, but frankly I couldn't reasonably argue for the legalization of Heroin along these lines.

gokieks said:
Uh huh. You'll have to excuse me if I don't find the "I can quit anytime, I just choose not to" type of statements to be the most credible sort.

You'll have to excuse me if I think you're talking about something you have no idea about.

Marijuana is less physically addictive than Caffeine. Fact.
 
in all seriousness the only bad thing about pot is you get lazy. and/or you may get wonky in the head from day to day if you're puffing non-stop.

it's pretty safe but don't assume you can just blaze all the time
 
Even chocolate is harmful, it's a very mild poison, you'll need to eat 22lbs for it to kill you though. That'll take a serious amount of effort to consume.
 
stuburns said:
No, it's not harmless.

Is the harm less than the pleasure it gives? That's a subjective answer.

I would say to anyone, considering doing any drugs to research it and make a mature decision about it. Not do it because your mates do or anything like that. Drugs can be very positive, and they can really suck.
but weed doesn't suck
 
half a moon said:
Medical use and decriminalization yes(slowly happening), legalization no. Allowing people to hallucinate in public would be socially irresponsible IMO.

Also, as other said nothing is harmless. At the very least: inhaling smoke is never good(I know you use it other ways), it can make people really paranoid, and it changes your physical appearance.

Hallucinate in public? Like how public intoxication is illegal in some states?

Nobody ever says drug should be unleashed to similarly irresponsible laws. They, like alcohol or any other powerful substance, should be controlled by a series of laws that if broken result in penalties.

If you drive while tripping on acid, fuck yo couch and go to jail.

If you drop acid in the comfort of your home, fuck you government go away.
 
pgtl_10 said:
Bill Maher on Larry King says it is. He is not the first to say that. Is their any truth to that?

I wouldn't say it's completely harmless.

But what I think what Bill Maher was trying to get across is that the irony in the outrage towards weed/Phelps is in part from Kelogg's cereal, and that most cereal is far more unhealthy than occasionally smoking weed. I would agree with that much (obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes, etc etc).
 
BocoDragon said:
2. It apparantly causes the dendrites in your brain to widen, making it less easily for signals to be transmitted between them. This causes memory loss..
I really don't buy this one. I don't smoke pot at all and I have a terrible memory, while a friend of mine smokes once a week roughly (for at least a decade) and his memory remains near photographic. He's a bit spacy when he's smoking, but that's the only way I can tell since he's no different otherwise.
 
Zozz said:
but weed doesn't suck
Not to me, and from your comment, not to you. But I know people who don't like it.

I was more talking about the more risky drugs I guess. I just think people should look into it if they're tempted to try something. Drugs are illegal, but advice about them isn't. I have a real issue with the way drug education is handled here in the UK. It's forcing people to go into drug use blind folded for the most part.
 
half a moon said:
Medical use and decriminalization yes(slowly happening), legalization no.

So your saying it should be legal to own, legal to use, but illegal to produce and illegal to distribute, thereby continuing a multi-billion dollar black-market industry with zero oversight and controls over distribution (age checks etc.)?

Nice plan.
 
Never got into Marijuana. Could never get any of my stupid pothead friends to answer the question 'why'. I was an ass like that even at the age of 13.

Things need to make some sort of sense. WHY do pot?

"Man it makes you forget about all of teh bad shit eh!"

But lifes little annoyances are still waiting for you there on the other side of your high....so WHY?

"Leisure!"

Just the fact that its illegal and costs so much means it cant hold a candle to any of my favorite hobbies.

But back on topic, yeah I dont buy that its harmless. Those guys I used to know still fuck with that shit to this day, we are grown ass men now. Theres SOMETHING about pot thats not kosher, thats for damn sure.
 
Puncture said:
Never got into Marijuana. Could never get any of my stupid pothead friends to answer the question 'why'. I was an ass like that even at the age of 13.

Things need to make some sort of sense. WHY do pot?

"Man it makes you forget about all of teh bad shit eh!"

But lifes little annoyances are still waiting for you there on the other side of your high....so WHY?

"Leisure!"

Just the fact that its illegal and costs so much means it cant hold a candle to any of my favorite hobbies.

But back on topic, yeah I dont buy that its harmless. Those guys I used to know still fuck with that shit to this day, we are grown ass men now. Theres SOMETHING about pot thats not kosher, thats for damn sure.

Why get drunk? Because it feels good.
 
Marijuana is not harmless. Marijuana stimulates the release of dopamine. Increased levels of dopamine can contribute to psychosis and other brain abnormalities. There has been a lot of research on this matter. I will concede that there are legal drugs that are every bit as harmful as marijuana, but I think it is downright irresponsible to suggest that marijuana is harmless.

Long-term marijuana use linked to brain abnormalities
Daily, long-term marijuana use may be linked to abnormalities in parts of the brain that regulate emotion and memory, as well as fear and aggression, according to a new study.

The part of the brain believed to regulate emotion and memory, known as the hippocampus, was on average 12 per cent smaller in marijuana users compared to non-marijuana users. The amygdala, which regulates fear and aggression, was on average just more than 7 per cent smaller.

Marijuana may increase risk of psychosis
Smoking pot may increase the risk for the type of psychosis commonly associated with schizophrenia, and the risk increases with each puff, a new British study reports.

Occasional smokers were 40 per cent more likely to suffer from psychosis, while dedicated tokers who used marijuana daily or weekly increased their risk by 50 to 200 per cent.

Marijuana use boosts risk of psychosis
Teens and young adults who frequently use marijuana are at higher risk of developing psychotic symptoms later in life, researchers say.

Dutch scientists studied 2,437 young people aged 14-24 to identify their predisposition to psychosis. Participants were questioned about their use of cannabis and followed for up to four years.

In the study, researchers used a broad definition of psychosis, ranging from occasionally hearing voices and paranoia to schizophrenia.

Marijuana use linked to psychosis in later life
Using marijuana can raise the risk of developing psychosis in later life by more than 40%, according to research published in The Lancet.

They found that smoking marijuana raised the risk of psychosis by over 40%, and the risk increased relative to the dose; the most frequent users were more than twice as likely to have a psychotic disorder. Considering that about 40% of people in the US and UK have used marijuana in their lifetime it is estimated that about 14% of psychotic disorders in young adults in these regions could be avoided if marijuana had been avoided.

If people really want to see marijuana legalized, I think it's important to have an honest dialogue about the drug. An argument can certainly be made that using marijuana is no more harmful than countless other legal activities; but I don't think Bill Maher is doing anyone any favors by insisting that its harmless.
 
Puncture said:
Never got into Marijuana. Could never get any of my stupid pothead friends to answer the question 'why'. I was an ass like that even at the age of 13.

Things need to make some sort of sense. WHY do pot?

"Man it makes you forget about all of teh bad shit eh!"

But lifes little annoyances are still waiting for you there on the other side of your high....so WHY?

"Leisure!"

Just the fact that its illegal and costs so much means it cant hold a candle to any of my favorite hobbies.

But back on topic, yeah I dont buy that its harmless. Those guys I used to know still fuck with that shit to this day, we are grown ass men now. Theres SOMETHING about pot thats not kosher, thats for damn sure.

it's cool that you don't smoke and all, but that's some dumb reasoning there. life's little annoyances are still waiting for you when you're done with, say, playing a videogame. or browsing a messageboard. or masturbating.

people smoke because it feels good. as to whether that's justification is another argument. but that is indeed "why" people smoke.
 
Lost Fragment said:
Depends on how you use it. If you let yourself become addicted to it, then it's far from harmless. But it's the same with lots of things. Alcohol, Internet, potato chips, etc.

But largely, yeah, it's a lot more harmless than the man wants you to think. Less harmless than alcohol or cigarettes, definitely.
.
 
AndersTheSwede said:
So your saying it should be legal to own, legal to use, but illegal to produce and illegal to distribute, thereby continuing a multi-billion dollar black-market industry with zero oversight and controls over distribution (age checks etc.)?

Nice plan.
I'm saying it's unrealistic and socially irresponsible to all of a sudden make it legal.

They need to slowly let more and more states use it medically, slowly decriminalize, and finally let 3 or fewer plants be legal. Which is happening minus the latter.

It's stupid to let people all of the suddenly get high whenever and how much they want. Everyone will want to do it. And it's stupid to have such strict laws for possession.

So, yes, I agree, It's a nice plan.
 
My personal opinion is that marijuana if used by responsible individuals carries about the same danger as drinking alcohol. I think both are OK if done in moderation. Like alcohol, marijuana should only be used to reinforce behaviour (used as a reward, positive reinforcement), and not an escape (negative reinforcement).

The short term risk of repeated marijuana use is loss of short term memory, and the long term risk is lung cancer (and maybe prostate cancer, but I think these findings are dubious). Short term memory loss is corrected after it's stopped being used. There are no long term risks of memory loss, and it doesn't cause "brain damage". The risks of lung cancer can be lessened by using a vaporiser.

Most physicians will tell you that there is no risk of physical addiction or withdrawal. But there is certainly a risk of psychological addiction (if used recklessly), and anecdotally I believe there are withdrawal symptoms (feeling 'dopey' the next day). But this is always mild, and usually goes away after a couple of hours.

So is marijuana harmless? No but no drug is harmless. Even water can kill you if you drink too much of it. But relatively, compared to almost all other recreational drugs (including alcohol and caffeine), it is far safer than most anything else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom