flarkminator
Member
Azih said:Jeez man, excuse me for not lapping up PR drivel from game previews and instead relying on my reactions to the companies previous work. And really I would have liked it if you had responded to my (valid, reasonable) criticisms and sparked an actual honest to goodness interesting gaming discussion on GAF rather than your pointless sarcastic one liner.
Hell not only am I just basing my negative view of Oblivion on not liking Morrowind. I am basing it on an interview I read from Bethseda about the differences between Fallout and the Elder Scrolls game. The man came right out and stated the major differences between the two series which prompts a Bethseda to take a much different tack when approaching Fallout 3 as opposed to Oblivion and everything he said about Fallout is what I look for in a RPG style experience and everything he stated about Elder Scrolls leaves me disinterested. (Troika you died one game too soon)
Bethseda up to this point makes games that are just not for me. For the reasons that I stated clearly, concisely (and without any attempt at insult humour for a change) when I talked about the issues I had with Morrowind. Spare me your derision.
Your valid reasoning previously was that because it did not exist in a previous version of a game, it will not exist in a succeded version of a game. That, imo, is bad logic. For example, Game A does not have online play, therefore I will completely disregard its sequals (even though all the information we've read is pointing to a online component.) As for you NEXT arguemtn which you have now brought to the table. This wasn't part of the previous statement you made, so I don't know why you're using to say I was unjustified.
On a side note, I love a link to the article so I can readi t.