Pennywise is gonna fuck with them wherever they go. There are no limits to places he can go.Oh god so Pennywise will be doing things to them in their sleep and in their bedrooms. This is going to bring back Nightmare on Elm Street memories.
Dat ending though, lol!A 3rd TV Spot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuMVXlYTYig
Nothing *too* new in this one, but still looking great.
Also, a new piece of official promo art:
![]()
I mean it's not like Texas Chainsaw 3D where we're supposed to believe that the main character is a 39 year old woman
That is crazy, this probably happens later in the movie!Pennywise lookin evil af goddamn
![]()
So are they omitting the adult section of the story? All I see in any of the trailers are kids.
Split into two movies.So are they omitting the adult section of the story? All I see in any of the trailers are kids.
Pennywise lookin evil af goddamn
![]()
Pennywise lookin evil af goddamn
![]()
Looks like they went more for the early 1900s clown look than a modern one in It's clothing and whatnot, perhaps to emphasize the fact that It has been around for a long long timeIf you showed me this out of context I wouldn't even recognize it as a clown
Besides the forehead cracking, the hair also looks like it's shaped a bit more into horns.Pennywise lookin evil af goddamn
![]()
That's clever. Also the paint sticking up like horns over the eyesBesides the forehead cracking, the hair also looks like it's shaped a bit more into horns.
I wonder if he'll look worse/more evil as the movie progresses.
I get that Curry's Pennywise is the one people have in their memory but you can really tell which one has the design with a movie budget and which had a TV movie budget. Curry's looks too human, which I guess works too, but I like how the one seems like the eldritch horror nature of It is just barely being contained behind that makeup and smile.
Super excited about this. It keeps looking better.
I stole some of those sunflower props from the set (3, in fact, which was very Bag of Bones appropriate).
I get that Curry's Pennywise is the one people have in their memory but you can really tell which one has the design with a movie budget and which had a TV movie budget. Curry's looks too human, which I guess works too, but I like how the one seems like the eldritch horror nature of It is just barely being contained behind that makeup and smile.
That's clever. Also the paint sticking up like horns over the eyes
===
A close-up comparison
I get that Curry's Pennywise is the one people have in their memory but you can really tell which one has the design with a movie budget and which had a TV movie budget. Curry's looks too human, which I guess works too, but I like how the one seems like the eldritch horror nature of It is just barely being contained behind that makeup and smile.
8 year old me would literally shit my pants tbh.Pennywise lookin evil af goddamn
![]()
If you showed me this out of context I wouldn't even recognize it as a clown
This Pennywise clown sure ain't luring any kids with how it looks.
I understand the different take this movie goes with Pennywise (and accept it, because for this take, it works), but Curry's "human-looking" Pennywise fit more with how It was described in the novel. Pennywise didn't look alien, it looked like a circus clown. He appeared to Georgie as just a "regular looking" clown that was said to be a cross between Bozo, Clarabell and Ronald McDonald, and jokes about how the storm blew the whole circus into the sewer. And that's not saying Pennywise didn't take the form of a scary clown (I remember descriptions where he has hollowed eye sockets and such), but the circus motif carried on throughout the story (how people would hear calliope music, smell cotton candy and popcorn, animal shit and such the presence of some of It's forms).That's clever. Also the paint sticking up like horns over the eyes
===
A close-up comparison
I get that Curry's Pennywise is the one people have in their memory but you can really tell which one has the design with a movie budget and which had a TV movie budget. Curry's looks too human, which I guess works too, but I like how the one seems like the eldritch horror nature of It is just barely being contained behind that makeup and smile.
The biggest issue I have with what I've seen. Hopefully these are just IT flexing its scary muscles and more normal clown pennywise is also featured, but, you know modern hollywood
I dont' know about this new IT remake. Like - I just don't feel like this is a clown I could hang out with, you know? Stretches believability.
If you showed me this out of context I wouldn't even recognize it as a clown
The biggest issue I have with what I've seen. Hopefully these are just IT flexing its scary muscles and more normal clown pennywise is also featured, but, you know modern hollywood
Pennywise lookin evil af goddamn
![]()
I dont' know about this new IT remake. Like - I just don't feel like this is a clown I could hang out with, you know? Stretches believability.
No snark intended, but I don't understand this.
What would you guys think this was without context? Generic demon monster?
8 year old me would literally shit my pants tbh.
That might work in the 50s setting of the source material but a clown ain't going to lure in children nowadays. And definitely not in post-John Wayne Gacy 80s. That's going to be fresh in all these kids' mindsNot generic, but yes? What's the point of being vaguely clown like? Why not go full on terror? The whole idea, as pointed out by many others as well as the source material, was to present something familiar, non threatening even, to lure children to it. This IT, doesn't even remotely for the bill.
Curry's looks like a serial killer on the surface. He definitely doesn't seem friendly or inviting IMOI like Curry's more as on the surface it doesn't look as menacing but soon as you look at the eyes and smile .... yikes.
The new version looks freaky from the get go.
Oh yea totally.Yeah man, I could see myself having a beer with Tim Curry Pennywise.
I must be out of touch because this trailer did nothing for me. I should say that I generally hate trailers but this one went the wrong way for me and then some. Hope for the best.
Note: IT the original scared enough to go home from a sleepover when I was 6. I read the book when I was 10/changed my life.
Apparently they are doing some kind of interactive experience with a reassembled Neibolt St house in Hollywood:
http://www.thatswhereitlives.com
The clown appears in the non threatening manner you describe like, once in the entire book. On the other hand, there are over a dozen other horrifying clown appearances, clown mixed with horror characters, lepers, monsters, etc. Your idea that pennywise is non threatening to lure kids is not supported by the text. First appearance with all of the losers club is a horrifying aspect that goes to their deepest fears, as with many other kids who are murdered by It, such as Eddie Corcoran.Not generic, but yes? What's the point of being vaguely clown like? Why not go full on terror? The whole idea, as pointed out by many others as well as the source material, was to present something familiar, non threatening even, to lure children to it. This IT, doesn't even remotely fit the bill.
Been reading the book and I like how the town of Derry is just as, if not more so, scary as It itself. It's like an American small town version of those folktale villages that sacrifice for another good harvest or Lovecraftian hamlets that quietly want to appease their god to survive another year. I've read books and seen movies and shows with that "town with dark secret" plot, but Derry is the best I've encountered in fiction so far.
I hope the movie can capture that
Looks like they went more for the early 1900s clown look than a modern one in It's clothing and whatnot, perhaps to emphasize the fact that It has been around for a long long time
When the first photos of Pennywise were released, some were surprised by his look, which includes very old clothing that is nothing like the type of clown popularized in the 20th century, in the manner Tim Curry looked like in the miniseries. Said Andres Muschietti, "The fact that this entity has been around for thousands of years... Aesthetically, I don't dig the 20th century clown. I think it looks cheap, and it's too related to social events and stuff and circus and stuff. Circus is fine, but I'm more aesthetically attracted to the old time, like the 19th century clown. And given that this guy has been around for centuries, I wondered myself why, why not, having an upgrade that was 1800s?"
It does give of an aura of being old, versus looking like a clown from the 80sIf he's been around forever then a costume from the 1800s doesn't make much more sense than a costume from the 1980s.