J.K Rowling delivers scathing put down of Emma Watson on X

After i finished reading this was my reaction:
iu
 
Emma Watson does not appear to have had a major film role since 2019 according to her Wikipedia or IMDB. All that pandering for nothing.
Let's be honest, she isn't that good at playing anything other than smarmy bitch. Last thing I saw her in was Beauty and the Beast and she wasn't that good
 
Nobody takes the mental illness factor seriously, but when their allies say "they're being murdered/killed by X" you'd think someone is actually out there shooting and stabbing them but in reality it's just them killing themselves because they're literally mentally ill.
They are a sacred cow of the left, so the left, especially the academic left, will bend over backwards to ignore, forgive, or make excuses for their violence, general mental illness, and unfitness to exist in modern society. Although, given recent crimes being committed by the tranny community (or by their surrogates), the public at large is starting to wake up to the fact that something may be terribly wrong with these people.
 
They are a sacred cow of the left, so the left, especially the academic left, will bend over backwards to ignore, forgive, or make excuses for their violence, general mental illness, and unfitness to exist in modern society. Although, given recent crimes being committed by the tranny community (or by their surrogates), the public at large is starting to wake up to the fact that something may be terribly wrong with these people.

I hope you aren't a hypocrite and say the same about religious people ;) given the most recent incident... and the general history of humanity.
 
I continue to praise providence for the fact that I've had no interest in Harry Potter in any of its forms, long before any of these people became controversial.
 
I saw that post come across my Twitter feed last night and my impression of it was JK Rowling was holding her tongue for a really long time but she was completely fed up and finally unleashed herself
 
Last edited:
They are a sacred cow of the left, so the left, especially the academic left, will bend over backwards to ignore, forgive, or make excuses for their violence, general mental illness, and unfitness to exist in modern society. Although, given recent crimes being committed by the tranny community (or by their surrogates), the public at large is starting to wake up to the fact that something may be terribly wrong with these people.
Not really. They are defended by liberals because of their core ideals, namely that everyone should be free to live their lives as they choose as long it doesn't hurt others, that all citizens deserve equal rights and protection, regardless of race, sex, gender, etc, with a belief that we can live in a pluralistic and tolerant society where different ways of life can coexist.

I know it can be confusing to some conservatives that liberals can be both tolerant of muslims and trans people, seeing that Islamic beliefs can very transphobic, but even those religious beliefs are tolerated by liberals out of respect for religious liberty, as long as, once again, those beliefs don't lead to discrimination which is when you will get pushback.

tldr libs don't give a fuck about trans, we care about people that are discriminated against
 
Last edited:
Which part is laughable? I'm just talking about liberal principles, I don't even think I made any value judgments ?
There's a no politics rule on this board, so I'm not going to get into a deep discussion with you, but everything you wrote was complete bullshit. If you think modern left really believes any of that or acts accordingly, you're just as delusional as the mentally ill trannies.

Beyond that, I'm putting you on ignore from here on out. It's clear you have nothing of value to say.
 
Last edited:
out of respect for religious liberty, as long as, once again, those beliefs don't lead to discrimination which is when you will get pushback.


You can't be serious.

The only reason (and I mean the ONLY) why the left allies with Islam is because they are the biggest threat to western society. See intersectionality theory, the pillar of the modern left ideology.

"respect for religious liberty" does not apply to either lefties or islamists. They are both equally intolerant. Extremely so.


I hope you aren't a hypocrite and say the same about religious people ;) given the most recent incident... and the general history of humanity.


Wokism is a pagan religion, it ticks all the boxes. Alas, putting that aside, the problem with this comparison is that trans are people who need medical and psychological assistance and lefties are using them as cannon fodder for their causes, it's disturbing. As a result, a bunch of them become crazy and violent, which is the logical outcome of mixing mental illness with dangerous drugs.
 
Last edited:
There's a no politics rule on this board, so I'm not going to get into a deep discussion with you, but everything you wrote was complete bullshit. If you think modern left really believes any of that or acts accordingly, you're just as delusional as the mentally ill trannies.

Beyond that, I'm putting you on ignore from here on out. It's clear you have nothing of value to say.
Welcome to the block party.
 
Good on Rowling. She's been one of the few high-profile "celebrity" figures to consistently take the sensible position as relates to this trans lunacy, and it earned her nothing short of death threats.
 
It was during my first marriage, to a woman that came from a family of millionaires, that I had an epiphany. To grow up rich was an awful existence, a curse of sorts. Not knowing what it was like to be 'normal', to judge others and yourself from on top of the mountaintop of society. That woman had next to no common sense, or what I would learn soon enough thereafter: a total lack of morals and character. She only cared about herself and making money, and her biggest worry was whether to take her medication for her diagnosed bipolar disorder because it made her gain weight. I thought it best to introduce her to actually striking out on her own, doing her own thing, making her own money outside of the family business. It was a romantically foolish idea, but she was all in for a short while. That was, until we actually tried to do it.

After about a week of having a 'normal' job, she absolutely hated showing up to work on time and was in tears about having to work a 40 hour period for something that would barely cover her expensive makeup. She was on the phone every night with her parents, who played up the angle of rewarding her for coming back. It was something else and looking back, I'm glad that we divorced about a year later. On our little adventure, she had cheated on me and I found out. This is sort of a common thing with bipolar females, I don't necessarily like to stereotype, but it's a thing that is very common to that disorder, unfortunately.

We went our separate ways and I know I ended up in a much better place, not monetarily, but for my own sanity. They couldn't pay me to go back to someone like that, ever. I'd rather be alone. I was able to find another woman pretty quickly and surprisingly, we had children around the same time as we saw ourselves at the same pediatrician. I looked at that poor bastard that she ended up with and he had the same look I remembered having when we were married. I felt bad for him, actually. Trapped like a rat in a trap with a goddamn wolverine.

Emma Watson reminds me of that woman so much. What a waste her life ended up being. My daughter loves Harry Potter and idolized Hermione when she was little, but nowadays thinks Ms. Watson is a total idiot based on the crap she posts as it is just empty and oh so out of touch. In a way I feel sorry for her, probably the way J.K. Rowling feels as well toward her. Being so rich her whole life has robbed her of a fulfilling life and she doesn't even realize how heavy a price she has paid. The woman has no soul and the whole world can see it.

When England inevitably course corrects, she's going to probably be one of the ones fleeing I imagine. She probably can get away with it because she's so wealthy, but leaving your homeland is a tricky thing- especially after the damage she has done to their culture. I wish her the best. Maybe she'll come around, but I doubt it.
 
In the end this is just a bunch of rich people arguing with other rich people, I don't see why it's news.
Yes.
But one of them has perhaps one toe on the ground.

Rowling is fighting for basic protection for wemon.
Watson thinks she is fighting for protection for wemon.
 
Still he is right, they are arguing now, not when JK was 14
And?

In the context of this comment, which was "two rich people arguing with each other," I don't see why it matters.

That said, Rowling wasn't always rich, while Emma Watson has been rolling in money since she was old enough for it to matter. Rowling at least has some lived experiences that Watson will never hope to have.
 
And?

In the context of this comment, which was "two rich people arguing with each other," I don't see why it matters.

That said, Rowling wasn't always rich, while Emma Watson has been rolling in money since she was old enough for it to matter. Rowling at least has some lived experiences that Watson will never hope to have.
Well if you don't see that the fact that two rich people are arguing with each other matters in the context of the "two rich people arguing with each other" comment, im not sure i can help you.
 
Brother this is like philosophy of language 101 stuff

the definition to What is a woman will always differ based on the context you ask it in, and you will never have a clearcut answer if you understand the nature of language. for example,

In law, you're a woman if that's what it says on ur birth certificate

In medicine, you're a woman based on your anatomy, reproductive organs, etc

In biology, you're a woman based on your chromosomes

In psychology, you're a woman based on your social behavior

And so on and so forth,

The fact that you're comparing it to a question like "is the earth flat?" which can only be looked at and answered through a scientific/empirical lens is dumbfounding

Just wondering, through which context did we decide Sydney Sweeney is a man?

If a dog behaves like a cat, it's still a dog. We don't start calling it a cat socially but a dog at the vet. It's just a dog acting like a cat. You see where this is going. That's a man, acting womanly. He doesn't just become a woman during a bout of catty behavior (see what I did there?)

I can draw a picture of the earth as a flat planet. Now the Earth is flat in fantasy. It's still round though, despite the vast possibilities of language.

Biology/medicine/psychology are all linked together and cannot be separated without ignoring the very same idea of empirical science that enables us to assert the earth is round. For a forum-appropriate analogy, it's like claiming all of the separate moving parts in a video game exist in a vacuum and don't affect each other; yet by observing one thing, you can make an empirically-tested prediction about how it will affect another thing. Someone in the field of psychology might prescribe a medicine and dose choice judged by biology, because they know different neurotransmitter issues present themselves.

It's not an extreme take; it's an observation, like the sun rises, water is wet, just upgraded to causal relationships, like; water evaporates, and makes rain. But there is a hard limit on how complex science can get before people come out to deny it on their magic cell phones.
 
Biology/medicine/psychology are all linked together and cannot be separated without ignoring the very same idea of empirical science that enables us to assert the earth is round.
Therein lies the problem that we face today. Scientists, medical professionals, and whole swaths of the population are willing to completely ignore every bit of empirical science to placate the trannies and their overly woke allies and supporters.

DNA? It's scientific gospel and irrefutable, unless you're talking about sex and gender, and then it's completely ignored. Evidently, how you feel and your desire to play pretend matter more than the basic building blocks of human existence.

Seriously, what mental gymnastics do you need to perform to pretend that someone with XY chromosomes can be female or XX chromosomes can be male? Further, what empty black hole exists in the souls of people who think it's OK for men/boys to share the same bathrooms/changing areas/etc... with girls and women?

What was the last movie Emma Watson was ever in???
The Bling Ring was the last movie that I remember her being in and that was maybe 10 years ago.
 
The post mentioned when was Emma Watson last in an actiing role; I replied with a source saying why she wasn't acting
Sure, but you also tacked a little bit of rudeness on there for no reason whatsoever. Just didn't see the point of the behavior is all, especially for a first post, not the kind of behavior that endears you to a community necessarily.
 
Last edited:
Both Emma and Rowling can go fuck themselves. Hermione ending up with Ron is the most retarded shit I have ever witnessed. Ruined the whole franchise for me.
 
Last edited:
I think at the end of the day it's safe to assume most celebrities and actors/actresses are the actual worst people you could get political takes or general opinions from. Most of them have no idea what it's like to live as a normal, paycheck-to-paycheck, un-agented person.

It's also pretty telling when you do have one that lived a normal life until stardom, because they usually either shut the fuck up about politics or they are quietly supporters of the opposite to mainstream.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom