its probably true but why is he so salty ?
what happened to him after ign ?
Maybe he got tired of this so called "game journalism", and the big companies trying to keep his mouth shut in exchange of "exclusive announcements".
Maybe, but who knows.
its probably true but why is he so salty ?
what happened to him after ign ?
Maybe this is why they removed the mandatory kinect use and upped the cpu and removed the mandatory OS use while gaming as MS must have been told by developers they cant freaking match multiplatform titles unless max resources are given to them. This probably will remove the ability to use kinect in some games and instant switching to OS. I am
Willing to bet the instant game to tv switching is gone too
I
Mean look at their ads they dont even mention tv or kinect anymore
It's true most people can't tell the difference.
Esram has the same problems as cell processor had for Sony. It's something that developers are having a hard time getting a grasp off and requires some serious optimization. The first year or so on Xbone will be quite similar to PS3'S lackluster looking games compared to 360.
Will we see games getting better next year? Possibly. Will PS4 get better too? Absolutely.
How?
I'm seriously baffled at how they SERIOUSLY thought that Sony would launch in 2014 with them.
Come the fuck on.
This gen would be NINE years old by then. What in the fuck?
How they thought that after the PS3 is astonishing.
I'd prefer seeing the Xbox division in Microsoft fold completely in epic fashion this generation, allowing for a single dominant system that removes the need for cross platform support thereby increasing profit margins and making more fringe/experimental games viable.
Then with the next generation a new challenger (Samsung, Apple, Valve, etc.) steps into the void left by MS coupled with Nintendo having a better strategy resulting in them gaining back some worthwhile core market share.
Microsoft has shown us what their plan ultimately is for consumers. To take away ownership of games, to blackmail us for the "right" to sell those games back to only approved retail partners, to use us as a conduit to achieve greater ad revenue, and to only service the core gamer as long as it takes to get them in the door before shutting down that aspect of their business and focusing on blue ocean products for the mainstream.
They want to devalue everything the industry has previously been built on and replace end users as the primary customer with advertisers, under the assumption that gaming is a strong enough fetish industry to keep us all around even when they use us as veritable livestock to pad profits.
In short, they can no longer be trusted as a power player in the industry and need to be shown the exit, post-haste. It's time for a new 3rd player in the industry.
It's almost exactly like Sony. Even the 25% higher price point.
No way was that a lesser extent! E3 is where everything started getting real crazy. People were cheering at the games work offline and price reveal like it was a fucking rock concert!I can't fucking believe that Microsoft
A: Let Sony get the drop on them with the 2013 release
B: Let Sony get the drop on them with the specs
They basically did what Sony did with the start of the PS3, but I don't know if they can turn it around. That took Sony -years-.
That February conference (& to a lesser extent the E3 one) are going to be the stuff of legend soon
I'm using a 32 inch TV and let me tell you: You're dead wrong.
do we really have to wait for Msft to announce it?
Gaming journalism is in a pretty pathetic state of being right about now. I can't believe that reviewers who sign NDAs even exist. Agreeing not to talk about certain elements of the product you are reviewing defeats the entire purpose of an honest review and turns reviewers into nothing more than PR newswire pawns for the big corporations.
BF4 720p on XB1 is definitely real.
I would argue strongly against that. I had a 32 inch 1080p LCD TV up until this year when I upgraded, and even at that size the difference between my PC rendering a game at 1080p vs the PS3/360 at 720 was absolutely clear as day.
It's almost exactly like Sony. Even the 25% higher price point.
I believe so, yeah.Was it leaked somewhere that MS thought Sony was launching in 2014?
I can't recall reading that, and all of the conjecture/rumors as way back as 2010 pointed to a 2013 launch from both parties.
BS. Sony became the most arrogant company, and everyone in the company acted like that. Search for Phil Harrison's and Jack Tretton comments about competition for example at the time. Kutaragi was behind PS1 and PS2 too. It's easy to blame one person for everything.
Dedicated system tho. It's not the same as a pc
Don't know why everyone is making such a big fuss about this, All you have to do is sit further away from your tv, problem solved. You can't see the difference between 1080p and 720p anyways. 1080p is just a marketing ploy like 4k.
For the first 4 years of the generation I played all my PS360 games on a SDTV. I dealt with a complete inability to read writing on my games for 4 years. I think I can deal with 720p.
I have a 32in. And I can't see any difference.
Let's get real though. All signs before February 20th pointed to Sony possibly going with a weaker platform for less money to help gain back the billions they lost from PS3 as a sort of PS3.5. MS had been raking in dosh for months prompting people to believe MS was gearing up to make a monster box that would crush Sony once and for all. It wouldn't be surprising if MS thought Sony was going to extend this gen as long as possible to make more money and even more so after Kaz told in an interview that Sony basically had no plans to announce a new system. Boom! There goes the Feb 20th Swindle.
noPretty sure without Kinect Camera they could have had the funds to drop in the 79xx/67x class gpu pretty easily. Remember that GTX 670s with lower clockspeeds go into gaming laptops. That's right, the mobile version is the same card, just smaller and downclocked.
This wasn't a space issue. This was MS choosing to spend money on Kinect camera and bundling it in, thus the $500 price point. If anything, they could've just used a 3 GB GDDR5 setup for the GPU and 4-8 GB DDR3 for the system. Yes it isn't as flexible as pooled memory but its a helluva lot faster than being held back by ESRAM.
Hindsight is always 20/20, but from the start I believe MS could have had the most powerful console and still been competitive at the higher price point. But by choosing to bundle in Kinect 2.0, I think they've shot themselves in the foot. After how forward looking and powerful Xbox and 360 were, I am disappointed to say the least
They thought Sony's hardware was going to be weaker.
Yep. The PS Meeting completely changed the industry.Sony Feb conference was the most evil act in corporations history! they surprised the sh*t out of Microsoft lol
Where does trolling twitter fit in with the tenets of journalism?
Return of the King confirmedBut this time it's different.
The PS3 was slightly more powerful, but harder to code for.
The 360 was slightly less powerful (CPU wise), but easier to code for.
This time around the PS4 is both more powerful AND easier to code for.
Link me, I haven't actually. I fully admit im Pro-Sony.
Let's get real though. All signs before February 20th pointed to Sony possibly going with a weaker platform for less money to help gain back the billions they lost from PS3 as a sort of PS3.5. MS had been raking in dosh for months prompting people to believe MS was gearing up to make a monster box that would crush Sony once and for all. It wouldn't be surprising if MS thought Sony was going to extend this gen as long as possible to make more money and even more so after Kaz told in an interview that Sony basically had no plans to announce a new system. Boom! There goes the Feb 20th Swindle.
http://youtu.be/BnxhC1-QcbM
This video of BF4 at the current xbone tour even has a guy calling out GAF about the resolution
"Gaf, it's definitely not 1080p"
Whether it's a joke or not, i dunno? You guys have probably seen it already...
And this becomes all the more funny...
Past gen we had PC+X360+PS3 to build up large enough userbase to make up the raised dev costs and at least some pubs and devs survived while many went belly up. Now imagine the same situation, but with higher dev costs and smaller combined userbase.