I was the alternate Jury for this car accident case where an elderly Jewish couple were suing this (very pretty) children's book author. The case was so absurd when I first got into that trial, but it was damned funny at the same time. I enjoyed going there everyday for this very reason alone, and I will never forget how the plaintiff owned himself while examining the defense's witness.
Anyway, the elderly couple hit the car in front of them and they blamed her for breaking too suddenly, so technically it was "her fault" that they were so irresponsible. The lawyer they hired was some hack they found out of a cracker box who didn't know left from right, and used sorry smirks and nonsense conclusions to try and persuade the jury. One Japanese guy thought it was so hilarious that he literally burst out laughing in the middle of the court, so the judge dismissed him temporarily so he could take a breath and control himself. We all thought it was pretty worthless being there; the case had no merit whatsoever.
Moving on, though. The true OWN3D moment came when the plaintiff was examining an expert on vehicular forensic science. He continually quoted an article that he read about car accident possibilities, damage studies, and the like. He would say things like, "According to so and so survey done in 1996, damage to the rear end of the vehicle showed no significant damage when... etc etc". He would always quote that study like it was the bible, but the forensic expert interrupted him and said that he was interpreting it wrong. Finally, the lawyer looked back at the forensic expert with his head cocked and a smile and said, "I don't believe you know what you're talking about... are you even familiar with this study... at all?!" To which then the forensic expert looked at him and said, "Yea, I'm familiar with it. I wrote the study." The Japanese guy had to be excused again for excessive laughter shortly thereafter.