• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Jury duty, #$*!

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can't escape!

I tried when I got the summons, the best I could get was a postponed date thanks to a letter from my human resources director. Yes! I'd like to swap my $16 an hour wage for $10 a day, or whatever the hell it was back in those days.

You apparently have to be a raving lunatic to get kicked out of the jury pool. I tried most everything within reason. I didn't bathe. I signed everything left handed. I wore dirty clothes, and generally presented myself as a derelict. Muttering to myself. Etc. Etc.

That didn't work. After the third day, I just flat out denied any impartiality to the cases I was being selected for. Some dumb bitch burned her mouth mistaking scalding hot water for iced tea. Yeah - That might not be a frivolous lawsuit if I were a dumb cunt. NO! That's some grimey fat American money grubbing right there. First thing's first. You can god damn well tell if something is scalding hot to the touch, particularly when you're expecting a tall cool glass of iced tea.

Blah blah.

There were some more cases they tried sticking me with, but in the end the best I could do was continuously get tossed back into the jury pool and go back to reading books and comics in the waiting room. Fucking sucked. >:|
 
They need to up the wage for jury duty.

A lot of times Jury duty fucks with people's financial lives because of the piss poor pay
 
GaimeGuy said:
They need to up the wage for jury duty.

A lot of times Jury duty fucks with people's financial lives because of the piss poor pay

It's not even a wage, it's a stipend. Wage suggests there's some material worth to the money you're getting. The money they give you pretty much covers lunch and a book to read for the day.
 
I heard they actually want the idiots to be on the jury since it's easier for the lawyers to change their minds. It's the intelligent, independant thinking people that they don't want because they're better able to see through all the lawyers bullshit and make a critical analysis of the case.
 
Go read a bunch of legal texts and quote bits of them in the interview. Use lots of big legal terms.

Or so says the John Larroquette show. Seems plausible enough, though.
 
I had jury duty 6 years ago and my job at the time was nice enough to give me my full pay for the 4 days that I was off. I was never selected to a case so I just sat in a big room with a bunch of other people while I read books all day.
 
If you make your decision clear on how you're going to decide the case before you even hear the testamony you'll be out of the courtroom in no time from what I've heard.

Just act like no matter what, you'll still find him innocent/guilty. Especially if race is involved. :3
 
last time i got picked for a trial it was pretty fun.. saw some T&A (evidence), heard some bedroom escapades, got some good debate in.. just try not to think how you're getting poorer by the second
 
xsarien said:
Unless they can read minds, they can't tell if you're just making shit up or genuinely mean it.
that wasn't my point. my point is that you should do the duty. I believe that's why they call it " jury duty" instead of "jury if-you-feel-like-it".
 
bune duggy said:
that wasn't my point. my point is that you should do the duty. I believe that's why they call it " jury duty" instead of "jury if-you-feel-like-it".

The last time I went, the case was one family member suing another because they fell in the latter's home and MAYBE sprained an ankle.

I had better things to do with my time, to be completely honest. I made that opinion at least a little clear to the counsel: That it was a petty case, and that there was no way I could look at it objectively because: 1) I couldn't possibly fathom how such an injury could warrant taking things so far; 2) That these people need therapy more than they need a lawyer.

They let me go.

I also really, really don't think too highly of lawyers. I'd be the one guy in the jury who thinks both are just twisting the evidence to swing one way or the other and hang the damned group. I'd be a miserable juror.
 
Ugh... Civic cases... those fucking suck. Jury duty for criminal cases isn't nearly as unbearable but it still not fun.

I'm expecting another summons here pretty soon, it's been a while.

Last time I had jury duty I believe they found me to be either 1) unreasonable or 2) bias. I was like #3 on the panel too I believe.
 
larrydavid.jpg

Uh... well, your honor, I believe it would be hard to remain impartial seeing as the defendant is a negro.
 
There's many ways to get out. If you're a full time student + employed, just send them a few papers proving that much and you're done.

If it's a death trial, just say that a close relative of yours was murdered and you want no part of this case (they will not take you if they see you have potential biases).
 
just defecate and urinate on the bailiff's chair or something, of course in NYC they see this all the time so....... or just say that you hate all brown skinned people. *shrug*
 
i got out of my first jury duty; actually i'm not really sure if i legitimately got out because i just sent them proof of why i couldn't be there, and didn't show up.
 
I got a whopping 50 or 60 bucks for my one day of Jury Duty apparently. I thought it was like 10 dollars a day but they sent me a check for that much. No complaints for me.
 
I was the alternate Jury for this car accident case where an elderly Jewish couple were suing this (very pretty) children's book author. The case was so absurd when I first got into that trial, but it was damned funny at the same time. I enjoyed going there everyday for this very reason alone, and I will never forget how the plaintiff owned himself while examining the defense's witness.

Anyway, the elderly couple hit the car in front of them and they blamed her for breaking too suddenly, so technically it was "her fault" that they were so irresponsible. The lawyer they hired was some hack they found out of a cracker box who didn't know left from right, and used sorry smirks and nonsense conclusions to try and persuade the jury. One Japanese guy thought it was so hilarious that he literally burst out laughing in the middle of the court, so the judge dismissed him temporarily so he could take a breath and control himself. We all thought it was pretty worthless being there; the case had no merit whatsoever.

Moving on, though. The true OWN3D moment came when the plaintiff was examining an expert on vehicular forensic science. He continually quoted an article that he read about car accident possibilities, damage studies, and the like. He would say things like, "According to so and so survey done in 1996, damage to the rear end of the vehicle showed no significant damage when... etc etc". He would always quote that study like it was the bible, but the forensic expert interrupted him and said that he was interpreting it wrong. Finally, the lawyer looked back at the forensic expert with his head cocked and a smile and said, "I don't believe you know what you're talking about... are you even familiar with this study... at all?!" To which then the forensic expert looked at him and said, "Yea, I'm familiar with it. I wrote the study." The Japanese guy had to be excused again for excessive laughter shortly thereafter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom