I would postulate that if you are functional enough to get an education then you ought to be functional enough to work.
But I admit I know nothing John Snow about the specifics of this bill and who exactly qualifies so I stand ready to be edumacated.
There is a place for individual responsibility, but frankly, few people can really do a rational cost benefit analysis to decide if a college education is appropriate or whether the degree they are pursuing makes sense at the age that they receive that education. Institutions shouldn't be letting you get these loans if an accountant with a calculator would say "No, this is not justifiable." The cost of education is out of hand, and the system does not make sense. The amount of tuition or the amount they can loan you should be based on actuarial calculations of expected income, and there should be hard limits.
I'm all for personal responsibility, but what of the institutions? What is their role? Why can they loan ridiculous sums of money to a young adult that might not even understand how loans work? I'll let you make this 100% about personal responsibility, but only if you let kids who graduate high school but can demonstrate a lack of knowledge about basic financial matters sue their high school for graduating them without giving them a proper education.
Also, the young adult isn't equipped to do the research. Heck, almost no one is. A lot of commonly used statistics on income for professions don't count people who got an education but were unable to get a job in their field. So, lets say I get a degree in film production (I did not), when I try to do research I'm probably looking at statistics about people who actually got a job in this field. How many people that graduate are unable to and do something completely different where their degree only plays a minor role in their compensation?