-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Kerry/Edwards Election Directive: Charge Voter Intimidation, Even If None Exists
- Thread starter Cooter
- Start date
- Status
How does that translate into charging there is voter intimidation even if there is none? It could just as easily mean they're going to be vigilant everywhere even in areas without a history of such abuses. Of course I haven't read the article, but then again I don't give Drudge hits.
Then again, it is rather hilarious how you apparently feel it's fine to do the same thing on the world stage so long as it's a Republican president, but not ok for the DNC to do it.
Then again, it is rather hilarious how you apparently feel it's fine to do the same thing on the world stage so long as it's a Republican president, but not ok for the DNC to do it.
Ignatz Mouse
Banned
That's a big if, considering WE'VE ALREADY SEEN IT.
You know caps make you look like an ass, right?
Anyway, on this note, I really don't care. This is just the dirty business of politics, which neither side is above. It's really not worth trusting what any campaign says as it pertains to the elctoral process and underhanded things the other side is doing. They're both guilty as sin, and both sides are willing to say anything need to regardless of how truthful it is or not.
Just watch the candidates, listen to what they have to say, decide whether or not you believe the things they say, and vote accordingly. Everything else is an absolute mess, and the morals and ethics of the political community would make even the residents of Sodom embarassed.
Anyway, on this note, I really don't care. This is just the dirty business of politics, which neither side is above. It's really not worth trusting what any campaign says as it pertains to the elctoral process and underhanded things the other side is doing. They're both guilty as sin, and both sides are willing to say anything need to regardless of how truthful it is or not.
Just watch the candidates, listen to what they have to say, decide whether or not you believe the things they say, and vote accordingly. Everything else is an absolute mess, and the morals and ethics of the political community would make even the residents of Sodom embarassed.
Ignatz Mouse
Banned
Just read it, and it's a non-story. They're talking about highlighting the issue, not creating it out of mid-air.
Cooter, I'm sure you were outraged about the torn-up Democratic registrations, too, right? Or is that OK, but talking about it is dirty politics?
Cooter, I'm sure you were outraged about the torn-up Democratic registrations, too, right? Or is that OK, but talking about it is dirty politics?
Ignatz Mouse
Banned
Please, attack my shift key, and ignore my point.
JoshuaJSlone
Member
I think the focus is more on the TITLE OF THIS TOPIC.Ignatz Mouse said:
After reading the scan (or whatever it is), it's exactly as I thought. No mention of actually charging anyone with voter intimidation or fraud, but just point out the record in areas that have a history of it, and bring a dialogue of potential and past problems into the discussion.
Both parties are already planning to have massive watches present anyway, and the RNC has "lawyers on call" for voter issues on election day anyway. Oh no!! The RNC says the DNC is going to try to steal the election because they're preparing for the possibility of something going wrong, how dare they be prepared!!
Both parties are already planning to have massive watches present anyway, and the RNC has "lawyers on call" for voter issues on election day anyway. Oh no!! The RNC says the DNC is going to try to steal the election because they're preparing for the possibility of something going wrong, how dare they be prepared!!
Drinky Crow
Banned
No dirty tricks here, but it *is* hilarious that the paranoid conservative crowd is finally starting to worry about karma.
OWNED
OWNED
Catchpenny
Member
Teiresias nails it, basically.
On another note, I highly doubt any "top DNC official" would actually bother talking to Drudge. Drudge probably got that quote from some freshman volunteer at the local community college.
On another note, I highly doubt any "top DNC official" would actually bother talking to Drudge. Drudge probably got that quote from some freshman volunteer at the local community college.
Mercury Fred
Banned
:lolDarienA said:
And this is just the sort of non-event that Drugde & his zealots like to cream over in order to draw attention away from Bush's complete failure as a leader.
Next.
Saint Cornelius
Banned
I would like to see the Black Panthers reunite and physically restrain idiots like Cooter, Ripclawe, et al. from voting. Give them a taste of some Florida-style justice.
Remember, as your fearless leader once said: "There oughta be a limit to free speech"
Remember, as your fearless leader once said: "There oughta be a limit to free speech"
I still am convinced that Neo-conservitism is a disease, it is some sort of defficiency in the way the brain functions. It causes you to do strange things like defy logic, read exactly what you want out of any document and repeat things over and over again until they become true. We can only hope that Stem Cell research can cure this as well.
Saint Cornelius
Banned
If the Black Panthers aren't available, then the S1Ws will have to do
Saint Cornelius
Banned
DarienA said:
Ah shit! I fuckin' forgot it. But being VH1 & all, I'm sure it'll be on many, many more times.
Cerebral Palsy
Banned
Republicans are getting desperate
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked